adamsea

93 ms·

871.
by adamsea 7y ago
You are literally saying “hide who you are, whenever I decide that who you are does not matter.” EDIT: OP literally says: “ I'm not saying hide who you are. But it's simply not relevant to the vast majority of discussions.” Again,
872.
by adamsea 7y ago
If you smile and ask the barista how their day is, then the interaction isn’t faceless.
873.
by adamsea 7y ago
Conceptual artists
874.
by adamsea 7y ago
A) By what process were those “small number of judges” appointed? By what process were the appointers appointed? B) Define “support”.
875.
by adamsea 7y ago
... somebody on the internet is wrong! ;) ... the question is who? Is it them? Is it me? Is it you?
876.
by adamsea 7y ago
Because nuclear power such a charged issue (pun intended), transparency and trust is especially important. The nuclear struggles with genuine transparency, which, imho, would go further than anything else to shifting the public's feeli
877.
by adamsea 7y ago
True. I would like to add, however, that just because they're not striking at the root doesn't mean they should stop hacking at the branch. It's still an evil branch, to use Thoreau's metaphor.
878.
by adamsea 7y ago
I personally didn’t interpret the article as arguing for authenticity in and of itself, more that this lady beliefs her approach provides health benefits of a particular kind. Nothing spiritual is prominently mentioned. They do briefly ment
879.
by adamsea 7y ago
When you say “play synth” ... Do you mean compose music with a sequencer or DAW like ableton? Or, read and play sheet music using a keyboard to control the synthesizer itself? The synthesizer and it’s means of control being separate make it
880.
by adamsea 7y ago
Not quite the same as knowing you still can have decent health care if you are unemployed.
881.
by adamsea 7y ago
Hmmm I do not know about that, the test real, meaningful control would be who gets the funding, no? Social sciences is nowhere near the top of this list. https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/se
882.
by adamsea 7y ago
It is different because in China I doubt there would have been any investigative reporting about the government and AT&T. And while AT&T doesn’t seem to have done this, other companies such as Apple have enacted privacy measures whi
883.
by adamsea 7y ago
No doubt. That is why it is so important to acknowledge and critique the past, to work towards the present and the future being less atrocity-filled.
884.
by adamsea 7y ago
Don't think that's an apples-to-apples comparison.
885.
by adamsea 7y ago
What? I’m sorry but, no. Also, car ownership depends on the region. In Los Angeles in many parts of the city you can’t throw a rock without hitting a Mercedes or BMW.
886.
by adamsea 7y ago
Noooo.
887.
by adamsea 7y ago
Pretty sure that word was made up - Google draws a blank.
888.
by adamsea 7y ago
Phd Graduate students seem to like labor unions - they have been organizing and striking for them a lot recently. And classical musicians (The Chicago Symphony Orchestra recently went on strike). Are they all stupid and listless?
889.
by adamsea 7y ago
Does that mean you oppose all companies or business which are owned by more than a single person?
890.
by adamsea 7y ago
> (like adding diversity to their governing board, seems designed to be exclusive to tech-startups that already have a bias toward that "value") I do not think the bias which you think exists is reflected by the actual makeup o
891.
by adamsea 7y ago
Movies, microcode, and pizza delivery.
892.
by adamsea 8y ago
Who gets to decide who is a scientist and who is not a scientist? Scientists?
893.
by adamsea 8y ago
If the knowledge is for all of humanity will you be incorporating as a B-Corp or some other form of social benefit corporation?
894.
by adamsea 8y ago
What about poetry, art, music, social movements, and, you know, culture?
895.
by adamsea 8y ago
Hi Jude, On your page you said "If an extremely niche topic is valuable to just a handful of people and positively contributes to society, it will have a home on Golden." Who will make that judgement call of what "contributes
896.
by adamsea 8y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice "Social justice is a concept of fair and just relations between the individual and society. This is measured by the explicit and tacit terms for the distribution of wea
897.
by adamsea 8y ago
The PATRIOT act was named by the people who concocted it. The term "social justice warrior" was not created by activists or people involved in organizations working for justice in our society. So, no. One is self-branding. The oth
898.
by adamsea 8y ago
IMHO AI ethics are a legitimate area of discussion, as should be any moral ethical issue w/regards to a business practice. And it sounds like Google is doing basically what you are saying.
899.
by adamsea 8y ago
Which nations, specifically?
900.
by adamsea 8y ago
Intentional sexism has worked quite well for the patriarchy.

More ›