Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
acedTrex
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
211.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Article deserves a bump just for the line > To me this is the visual language of Blockchain/NFT scams mixed with the butthole motifs that AI companies like so much. Hilarious, once you see it you can not unsee it
212.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
The blog appears to imply that the author only opened the codebase after a significant period of time. > It’s not until I opened up the full codebase and read its latest state cover to cover that I began to see what we theorized and hope
213.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
> My way is to understand my own codebase and look at the output of the LLM. Then you are not vibe coding. The core, almost exclusive requirement for "vibe coding" is that you DON'T look at the code. Only the product outco
214.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
You can tell its slop cuz its 1k lines in a single main.swift file lol
215.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
[flagged]
216.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Damn the UI feels great, actually kind of eerie
217.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Did you not read the comment you are replying too?
218.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
And how do you verify those three things in a rapid low effort fashion?
219.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
If thats your signal then you lock yourself out of all parts of this website, not the best heuristic
220.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Because it is not reasonable to expend high effort to verify something that took no effort to create. That is not a workable long term solution. Instead you have to rely on low effort signals to signify if something is WORTH expending energ
221.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Both a .cursor AND a .claude folder, what a yikes. Slop post galore
222.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Thank you for writing an awesome book!
223.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
I have bought the print version of this 3 seperate times to give as a gift, its excellent.
224.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
It's moreso everything will need a signed hardware key of some sort. The app is just the easiest expression of that.
225.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
I really wanted to get into nushell but i found reedline to be very limiting in a few specific ways esp around keybindings that blocked me from moving to it
226.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
This is why i simply do not bother with them unless the task i need is so specific that theres no room for argument, like yesterday i asked it to generate me a bash script that ran aws ssm commands for all the following instance IDs. It did
227.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
"building a compiler that translates typescript to native binaries" Is a really weird way to say that you built a native compiler for typescript.
228.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Its more of a usecase for large platform teams that want to automate and enable hundreds of teams with thousands of disparate cloud resources. You can have a small bit of terraform for crossplane then crossplane for the 99% of the other res
229.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
> a) that doesn't intrinsically mean it's slop If it can quickly and easily be identified as LLM code then yes, it is intrinsically slop and of no value. The person who submitted it did not even value it enough to look at/
230.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
> and Kubernetes operators neither cover those nor are a reasonable approach to the problem domain. I mean Crossplane is a pretty popular k8s operator that does exactly that, create cloud infrastructure from K8s objects.
231.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
I mean if you want bury your head in the sand and try to play semantics over if its ENOUGH proof or not go right ahead. But it's more than LLM enough for anyone who has experience with them to conclude the LLM drove the majority of the
232.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
They are indeed synonyms
233.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Easiest one is ridiculous comments, always a dead ringer for an LLM. ESPECIALLY when its from a plan and comments '// STEP 2: ...' Like here in this posts repo https://github.com/huseyinbabal/taws&#x
234.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
> How do you know this was a "slop" if you did not try it? Because I have eyes and can look at the code for 2 seconds. It's not very difficult to check for the hallmarks of careless slop code. If you can't tell in a f
235.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
> LLMs bailed us out of the impending ultra-specialization. This is fundamentally what makes them so DAMAGING to humanity. They didn't bail us out, they robbed us of it.
236.
▲
by
acedTrex
9mo ago
Good lord thank you, the comparisons to other "abstraction changes" have made me so mad. You are not changing the abstraction, you are generating it in a different way. That is a hugely different idea. Until the ONLY thing you loo
237.
▲
by
acedTrex
10mo ago
An excellent stepping down post, nothing more could be hoped for. Enjoy the next projects
238.
▲
by
acedTrex
10mo ago
That is the entire point of the FTC. To decide what actions are fair to the free market and enforce it. You can disagree with khans take on it but it is the stated purpose of the FTC to dictate that.
239.
▲
by
acedTrex
10mo ago
> We can write code a lot faster than we can safely deploy it at the moment. This has always been the case?
240.
▲
by
acedTrex
10mo ago
Its been over for well over a decade tbh
More ›