Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
acedTrex
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
> Even before LLMs came along a lot of hobbyists were using high level languages, linters, IDEs etc. instead of handcrafting assembly or machine language. Those tools increased the capability of hobbyists to build what they find interest
62.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
> I don’t understand the world of people who have this degree of free time You dont understand that people have hobbies they enjoy doing? Because thats the entire point of the article.
63.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
> targeted usage for tedium that has very little value overall The entire point of the article was the hobby is ascribing value to that tedium that the LLM is removing.
64.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
> So at least in my experience, it’s not about gatekeeping as much as it’s about keeping the experience bearable for the existing hobbyist community. Keeping the experience bearable BY gatekeeping. That is the point, gatekeeping is not i
65.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
Ive really been enjoying waymo, ill pay a premium over anything else for them.
66.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
Wow i made it like 1 paragraph in before i had to bow out of the slopfest, tough scene.
67.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
God the "compiler abstraction" argument is so tired, why does anyone even remotely thinks its accurate anymore
68.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
Why?
69.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
Ya this is exactly how I use it, the LLM does everything i don't want to do. Which is basically everything except the exact code im writing. Its very freeing to not have to worry or touch a jira ticket ever again. The LLM just does it
70.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
This is very trivial to implement in any serious tool/workflow. I have a version of it in my pi nvim setup.
71.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
The llm will figure it out when it relooks at the file.
72.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
"context engineering" as a term will never not make me laugh.
73.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
> coding is largely solved - Boris
74.
▲
by
acedTrex
2mo ago
Human written slop is SIGNIFICANTLY more enjoyable than LLM slop, it tells a story no matter how bad the dev is. LLM slop is a tidal wave of meaningless drivel.
75.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
> Pretending to run an inclusive git hosting service They are not trying to run an inclusive service.
76.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
I looked into contributing but found the existing ecosystem to be very confusing and convoluted.
77.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
Quite a fascinating level of incompetence from openai here. Not unexpected obviously but come on, if you are getting outsmarted by an LLM you deserve it.
78.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
Ive typed out several things, none of them really capture succinctly the level of disdain I have for people that this article is describing. I cannot fathom the idea that one is warping their work on a given engineering problem around the a
79.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
Its pretty snappy/responsive for me at least so thats good. Normally LLM slop sites are pretty at first but sluggish as hell. So some level of skill went into this one.
80.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
I mean, I am no LLM lover but in the possible "success case" there are also many many other cool/good to humanity use cases. Whereas ads are almost exclusively negative.
81.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
The fact this is controversial is wild and a grim sign for an already struggling industry.
82.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
I left because Github became too LLM obsessed and I find that to not align with my personal ideals. Its not really deeper than that. The programming community will continue to splinter more into those that care about the craft and those tha
83.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
It comes down to culture on the team, if you think your leadership will allow that/you won't get a bad perf review for doing it go for it. That is sadly not a lot of peoples reality.
84.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
> For the person who rejects PR suggestions, it makes me less inclined to participate in those PRs. Why spend the time doing a thorough review if it's going to get rejected anyways. This is why you leave blocking suggestions and for
85.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
Yep, without a decent team culture this is what LLMs force, the slop deluge is just overwhelming without leadership asserting "no, stop" Ultimately you just let bugs through because the alternative is spend an inordinate amount of
86.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
You get better at proactively setting up feedback loops and the ability to respond quicker. Saying "im sorry this is broken it will take us a few weeks to fix it" feels infinitely worse than "im sorry this is broken give us a
87.
▲
by
acedTrex
3mo ago
This is exactly what i do, its very easy. I mirror across codeberg, github and a local forge instance
88.
▲
by
acedTrex
4mo ago
I started using zig more heavily for some edge device ML inference projects lately after watching Andrews jetbrains interview and it really really resonating with me on a personal level. Am also really overall enjoying the language, it def
89.
▲
by
acedTrex
4mo ago
Just to be clear, i also find the "determinism" points to be a bit misleading if the intent is accurate, obviously there has been some level of non determinism in compilers and computing forever. I think the better word is "p
90.
▲
by
acedTrex
4mo ago
I despise this retort that i see constantly, in no way shape or form is it remotely an accurate analogy. They are two completely different things and its dishonest to attribute the two together.
More ›