acct1771

81 ms·

901.
by acct1771 8y ago
"Irrational refusal"? https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/11/06/linus_torvalds_targ...
902.
by acct1771 8y ago
In the right hands, of course.
903.
by acct1771 8y ago
I read it as satire.
904.
by acct1771 8y ago
50-52% of US federal budget = defense budget, so...
905.
by acct1771 8y ago
This is likely all too common. After all, who's in a better position to know when someone's trying to sucker an investor?
906.
by acct1771 8y ago
s/better/easier, to be safe
907.
by acct1771 8y ago
I love the casual potential blaming of Russian state actors for corporate cyber attacks, but complete disbelief when NSA is accused/implicated in the exact same...
908.
by acct1771 8y ago
Test kits, test kits, test kits, TEST KITS. This whole thread needs test kits.
909.
by acct1771 8y ago
Backdoors that can be turned off are backdoors that can be turned on. Unless you have a fuse to be pulled, or blown.
910.
by acct1771 8y ago
Less literate in terms of creating anything .
911.
by acct1771 8y ago
And then what?
912.
by acct1771 8y ago
"Seem"
913.
by acct1771 8y ago
Didn't you read the comment? One blatant example: how do you think it'd benefit intelligence agencies to see who begins encrypting their comms after the news breaks? If it's a topic of talking head discussion on the news, and
914.
by acct1771 8y ago
It may not sound nice to say, but working with state actors (U.S. Mil) removes you from the "innocent civilian" column. Regardless of whether you believe what the state actor was doing The Right Thing™ or not.
915.
by acct1771 8y ago
Bombed to death.
916.
by acct1771 8y ago
Because it's easier to just infiltrate and corrupt them politically, which the machine can't do nearly as easy in to middle east.
917.
by acct1771 8y ago
You're not actually blaming this phenomenon on Russia, right? Look no further than the military-industrial- Congressional complex. Congress and their friends own media, food, weapons and intelligence, finance, etc...
918.
by acct1771 8y ago
The same way you'd think they'd be interested in securing basebands from intelligence agencies. Buuuut, they don't. My suspicion? The Kingmakers at the tres letras don't allow it. Hell, they steal SIM encryption keys, to
919.
by acct1771 8y ago
Right, or wrong, I'm kinda surprised there's someone here who hasn't heard this! Can you think of any other reason it'd be like that?
920.
by acct1771 8y ago
That wording is gold.
921.
by acct1771 8y ago
I'm not even going go read past the headline to say: technology is not the problem, here, stop titling things as if it is.
922.
by acct1771 8y ago
Especially when some sides of it have received your money and weapons....
923.
by acct1771 8y ago
Yeah, someone returned fake gear before you bought it. Or, a middleman unloaded, knowingly or unknowingly, a shipment of fake shit to Best Buy.
924.
by acct1771 8y ago
Is microG, and Yalp, usage not against ToS?
925.
by acct1771 8y ago
Could you elaborate on "breaking the law"?
926.
by acct1771 8y ago
Fine them for the anticompetitive practices, then - not success...
927.
by acct1771 8y ago
Uh..stop using Google..?
928.
by acct1771 8y ago
You don't need survival instincts when you're insulated, and, in many cases, easily isolated (see: elite class buying bunkers).
929.
by acct1771 8y ago
What you care about, and what the public has a right to know, don't have to be the same.
930.
by acct1771 8y ago
Because the seller still needs to sell it. And their reduced cost of goods sold compared to USA is low enough to sustain a decrease in margin. How much, I don't know. Devil's advocate: who else will actually buy that steel?

More ›