acct1771

63 ms·

691.
by acct1771 8y ago
What makes you say that?
692.
by acct1771 8y ago
They don't. That's why they're passing the buck to someone who can.
693.
by acct1771 8y ago
Why are they pointy-haired..?
694.
by acct1771 8y ago
Meanwhile, there's stacks of Mastadon clients on F-Droid.
695.
by acct1771 8y ago
Individual sovereignty. Drug approval services provided by government are there because we want added safety - not to be told what to do.
696.
by acct1771 8y ago
He should have used "inebriated", technically cannabis does act as a toxin to you, but, I find it misleading to categorize it like that =]
697.
by acct1771 8y ago
It's not gone. Just underground/waiting.
698.
by acct1771 8y ago
This is the point of failure. This never comes to fruition. "Computers are hard, and I'm just not very good with them!"
699.
by acct1771 8y ago
Not if it's a Vera Bradley lunch box.
700.
by acct1771 8y ago
I believe you, but haven't read anything about this. Any cases you'd suggest?
701.
by acct1771 8y ago
Name is "Aaron Swartz", by the by.
702.
by acct1771 8y ago
It's not that hyperbolic at all, actually. But I was asking a question of ethics, not fact.
703.
by acct1771 8y ago
Don't bother pointing out that those cases are abnormal, and the mothers have diseases...
704.
by acct1771 8y ago
What made it terrible?
705.
by acct1771 8y ago
Assuming this is a serious question...a continuity tester.
706.
by acct1771 8y ago
It's the people receiving that yearly rate that are the true criminals; still, drinks all around.
707.
by acct1771 8y ago
Is that reasonable to you?
708.
by acct1771 8y ago
Also, the term you're looking for is "conspiracy theories", not "conspiracies". Common misconception for some reason.
709.
by acct1771 8y ago
...would you believe Bush didn't cause, but closer to "accidentally allowed", 9/11?
710.
by acct1771 8y ago
Could that have been because the platform people would use to see his new content was no longer able to be used for this purpose, and people have been cordoned into walled gardens so long the general public is no longer aware of alternative
711.
by acct1771 8y ago
> Yet that's clearly not the case. Ugh...yes, it is. Our people are just too stupid to find the dissenting opinions.
712.
by acct1771 8y ago
Cataloging it, as long as it suits their agenda. Otherwise, deranked. Removing videos from war reporters' channels, but promoting garbage like Lil Yachty to the top of the Youtube etc charts out of nowhere with no view numbers, let alo
713.
by acct1771 8y ago
Depends what your threat model is.
714.
by acct1771 8y ago
..by the new OS/kernel they forced you to install, without writing it to be friendly to the old phones they're forcing it onto.
715.
by acct1771 8y ago
Tragic? Haha...wow.
716.
by acct1771 8y ago
How did early smartphones use them..?
717.
by acct1771 8y ago
Since Samsung is a corporation, it tells me that grommeting cost more than $0.
718.
by acct1771 8y ago
If you understand what this does, there's no such thing as an insignificant scale.
719.
by acct1771 8y ago
They would if it were legal. And likely will.
720.
by acct1771 8y ago
Was the typo to drive home your point?

More ›