account73466

13 ms·

61.
by account73466 7y ago
I remember that GCP claimed they will follow Moore's Law and drop the price for the same instance type over time. It was just BS marketing, unfortunately I believed them.
62.
by account73466 7y ago
Go to Google Scholar, type your favorite company and "deep learning". If you find no paper from that company, chances are high their stock price is not beating S&P 500 over the last 5 years. Also, top S&P 500 companies by
63.
by account73466 7y ago
You see that from papers published at top ML conferences. Top contributors are often from FAANG. Some papers are clearly applications.
64.
by account73466 7y ago
AI is the term used by marketing division and clueless public. Researchers don't use that term without a special need. FAANG engineers actually use ML approaches.
65.
by account73466 7y ago
>> Many of the doctoral candidates I knew in school couldn't find positions in academia because of market saturation. The situation is now drastically different compared to say 40 years ago. That is why so many PhDs leave for ind
66.
by account73466 7y ago
True but I am not sure "nanotech" was used by top S&P 500 companies and their engineers on a daily basis.
67.
by account73466 7y ago
>> Diversifying AI faculty along gender lines has not shown great progress, with women comprising less than 20% of the new faculty hires in 2018. I am wondering what is % of women doing PhD in the same field and whether it is growing.
68.
by account73466 7y ago
Buying renewable energy does not make your footprint zero. You can twist the definition until it suits your needs but if you properly count footprint of the chain, it cannot be zero.
69.
by account73466 7y ago
>> all the stuff we trained in our Google Data Center — the carbon footprint is zero That is a lie unless Jeff Dean lives under different physics laws.
70.
by account73466 7y ago
The technological revolution is going to make the top appear to be gods while the bottom, well, the bottom will prey :\
71.
by account73466 7y ago
Historically the trend of things we don't/won't own: land, house, data, right to have kinds, your body. Why? One argument that is cooking right now: "you don't know how to properly manage these things to support s
72.
by account73466 7y ago
If you will even need to solve TSP, this guy solved it almost optimally for millions of cities http://webhotel4.ruc.dk/~keld/ This is from my experience of dealing with it more than a decade ago.
73.
by account73466 7y ago
>> Maybe this time it's different, imho because of Google translate. Sounds like you are not from the field.
74.
by account73466 7y ago
>> There is no standalone AI/ML etc... capability that makes money on it's own You can do trading, no need to have clients in that case.
75.
by account73466 7y ago
(ii) sounds like a version (iii)+(iv) but it is not because you will not be truly free. If you go (iii)+(iv) via a start-up line, you will not be free either because you will have to deal with customers. Should come up with something smart
76.
by account73466 7y ago
>> who have those traits that machines lack, i.e. creativity and vision I would go further and say that once machines will be able to lie better than humans, we are done. >> produce high powered tools rather than true autonomous
77.
by account73466 7y ago
We should view AI in the context of the technological revolution. You all have a good approximation of what might happen. The question is what to do. I believe that since the population size of intelligent agents will grow exponentially fa
78.
by account73466 7y ago
Then they would definitely advertise it by attacking the company so that the whole world would know about their secret backdoor. Very smart, indeed!
79.
by account73466 7y ago
or maybe or maybe ...
80.
by account73466 7y ago
Read again "The currency component of USD doubles every 10 years." Therefore, "they do not include any lost money" is irrelevant unless you believe people lose about half of their money over a single decade "Not a s
81.
by account73466 7y ago
In your paper, why you acknowledge people by their name but you don't disclose your names?
82.
by account73466 7y ago
>> Whats the mcap of USD? Start here https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?id=CURRSL , and here https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2014/09/how-much-money-is-th... The currency component of USD
83.
by account73466 7y ago
>> who is more likely to take American state secrets at company X and give them to China This sounds very similar to sexist arguments like "who is more likely to better score at work" used to then discriminate. You cannot us
84.
by account73466 7y ago
tell them to hate something and they will run their shallow neural networks in a highly predictable manner
85.
by account73466 7y ago
Do you think it will prevent people here from being racist? Edit: it will not, I am not Chinese btw
86.
by account73466 7y ago
>> Mcap is just a multiplication of the price. Who claimed the opposite?
87.
by account73466 7y ago
Bitcoin is not a currency in its common sense, it is a speculative asset. Call everything meaningless is pretty meaningless as well. >> Comparing it to the marketcaps of companies is even more meaningless Wrong. >> And comparing
88.
by account73466 7y ago
>> To someone who isn't thinking through what the numbers and their resulting ratios mean, I suppose it sounds authoritative. Is it an insult, Arnav? Thousands of scientists use my research and they would probably disagree that I
89.
by account73466 7y ago
fixed, thanks
90.
by account73466 7y ago
More than 90% of Bitcoin volume is fake, there is no question about that. However, if you believe Binance's figures then these figures alone are sufficient to support Bitcoin's current market cap in the sense that its volume &#x2F

More ›