absolutelastone

9 ms·

61.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Don't those heterodox ideas about debt predict these increasing prices?
62.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
You could make it your self for the cost of soybeans basically. It's a cheap food sold as a gourmet item because it's rare. Like a lot of other fermented foods.
63.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
So you took the generous route in publicly shaming them. I think their quibble was with a different item being used as evidence there (i.e., having a family), not necessarily with all that was said.
64.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
And they have to assume you will assume this, so they would expect your silos will already be emptied in a retaliatory strike. Of course you have to trust early-warning systems and the ability to react decisively and quickly.
65.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
This seems like a sideways trade and in the same spirit. Military defense guarantees, not on the table according to 4 presidents now, could become a possibility for that subset of land which does not require entry into a currently ongoing
66.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
There is no such deal on the table. The meeting was for a minerals deal. All the other stuff was press questions about the future of the relationship.
67.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Crimea was 10 years ago now. And Obama at that time didn't intervene, in fact he called on Europe to spend more on defense. Europe is much bigger (in population) and richer than Russia. This is a different situation than the cold war.
68.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
I assume the intended audience for the tariff talk is rust belt workers (who swung the election) who feel cheated for more dramatic reasons like their company folding while foreign suppliers thrive.
69.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Sure is a lot of "Towards..." in titles lately. That tells me what wasn't accomplished rather than what you did.
70.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Yeah technology never makes anything better. And the healthcare system is perfect the way it is. This is the sarcasm thread.
71.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Link says the numbers are adjusted to 2023 dollars and a three person household.
72.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
I feel like there is a logical paradox here. You're using a bigger hyperbole to criticize a hyperbole. If this argument is valid then it invalidates itself.
73.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Perhaps. I'd even say it's part of what is taught as part of a PhD. But if someone was ready for your exact question by having the right interview practice/experience, or they just don't care about your job so there&#x27
74.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
> The goal isn't to "solve the puzzle" but instead to demonstrate you can reason about it effectively, communicate your knowledge and communicate as part of problem solving. ...while being closely monitored in a high-stake
75.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
They don't even need to go to that extreme. Probably a majority of their qualified applicants are screened out via their leetcode and high-stress interviews. They tell congress they can't find capable employees then tell applicant
76.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Technically there are a few different ways you can potentially eat yourself to death. Also I'd say the balanced budget "extreme" is more directly analogous to maintaining a balance of calories in versus out, not starvation.
77.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
There's grants and studies going on for all kinds of treatments for Alzheimer's. Amyloid may be the biggest category, perhaps undeservedly, but it's still a minority of them. Also I think your article may be a bit out of date
78.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Wouldn't that hard choice be between not operating in that country (and losing a lot of money) versus selling out their customers? Is that a good position to put them in?
79.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
There's a long list of stuff people are supposed to be screened for. Many people die of stuff that has high survival rates when caught early. Pap tests, mammograms, prostate exams, are other examples for cancer.
80.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Screening recommendations are based on statistical arguments that take false positives (plus the risk of the test itself) into account and calculate whether more people would be helped than harmed.
81.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
I think these days they do recommend screening all children for cholesterol.
82.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Well i don't see why we need to mangle the jargon. "Language model" has an old meaning from NLP (which still applies), as a computer model of language itself. Most commonly, a joint probability distribution over words or sequ
83.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
You can do broadcasting with a tensor, at least for products and sums. The product is multilinear, and a sum can be in two steps, first step using a tensor to implement fanout. Though I can see the value in representing structure that can b
84.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
The problem is when the constraints exclude methods that are comparable performance while otherwise being superior options for the problem they are solving. I've found this to be extremely common.
85.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
Those places you list have gone up painfully in a relative sense (like everywhere lately) but are nothing like the absurdity of California. You don't need two highly-paid professional incomes to afford a house with a long commute. Ther
86.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
I agree more science is certainly better than less. But patentable therapies will always get a disproportionate amount of funding for big science (versus a basically-free dietary change). For ketones and cognition, also look for studies on
87.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
I think our IP laws are optimized to maximize benefits for the legal system.
88.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
"never" in corporate-speak means not for 4.5 years.
89.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
It's easier to see where the contractions are, since the same line connects two tensors, versus hunting for repeated indices in a mess of many indices among many tensors multiplied together.
90.
by absolutelastone 2y ago
It's a catch-22 because the defense can now attack it for being presented in court when the disclaimer says not to. They apparently did have enough other evidence to satisfy the judge since they got the warrant without it.

More ›