abritinthebay

187 ms·

1741.
by abritinthebay 11y ago
How does that cause grief? That's called "context" and language has it. Isomorphic here is being used in the already existing biological sense. Just because the HN commenting user base is largely ignorant of non-mathmatics te
1742.
by abritinthebay 11y ago
on HN maybe. Nowhere else.
1743.
by abritinthebay 11y ago
Given that the usage of isomorphic is perfectly correct (it's using the biological, not mathematical, definition) I don't know how you'd do that...
1744.
by abritinthebay 11y ago
Michael's great, one of the smartest engineers I've worked with, but I don't think even he would say he meant to imply we don't use any caching at all. He's also mostly talking about our Elixir stack which is not
1745.
by abritinthebay 11y ago
Because there were multiple camps under the Treblinka banner. Treblinka I was a forced work camp. They had transit stops, and people came in and out of here. That's what most stories about it being a transit camp are. Treblinka II was
1746.
by abritinthebay 11y ago
I work at Bleacher Report. We use caching. Everywhere. As much as possible. We can probably do more. Just because we end up using that cached content to create a unique mix for each user doesn't mean that we don't cache. I think y
1747.
by abritinthebay 12y ago
It's using the completely correct biology usage: "a similarity of form or structure between organisms" Thinking it only refers to one field and is wrong - when the usage is totally correct (and very applicable) just makes you