ablob

18 ms·

211.
by ablob 4y ago
I don't quite agree with your argument. In the literal sense thinking before speaking is just that. It can lead to you rephrasing your thoughts multiple times before you find a way to convey what you want to say in such a manner, that
212.
by ablob 4y ago
Template metaprogramming in the absence of constexpr/concepts would be my guess.
213.
by ablob 4y ago
Even if it were "Boids", I don't think it worsens the argument by a lot. The essence of the statement is that complex behavior can emerge from a simple ruleset. I'd like to add, that while individual behavior is difficul
214.
by ablob 4y ago
Depending on what you deem to be a suitable replacement i'd recommend: nvim-telescope/telescope.nvim // integrates well with code actions and searching (very extensible in general, similar to ctrl-p) hrsh7th/n
215.
by ablob 4y ago
A trackpoint device embedded in the keyboard may or may not be your friend, then.
216.
by ablob 4y ago
If its about hardware security measures it may be its spatial cost. Having each circuit / subcircuit bring its own safety is certainly gonna be subobtimal when optimizing for size. On the software side I reckon the driving circuit is t
217.
by ablob 4y ago
If you know how much memory you need, you can just have a section of zero-initialized-data for that, which the allocator then handles. The allocator serves also as a proxy, as in: only the allocator needs to know how to request heap space.
218.
by ablob 4y ago
How are any of the guarantees lost as long as the resulting C++ code isn't touched?
219.
by ablob 4y ago
I think it's more about losing control. As soon as the documentation is open, there is a lot more pressure to explain the decisions made in an accurate or accepted fashion. Add some good old bike-shedding or contributions that miss the
220.
by ablob 4y ago
Wouldn't it be easier to have a convenient library/parser for almost all of the use cases instead of an immensely complex catch-all solution? Having custom logic when required should almost always be less complex when such a ~stra
221.
by ablob 4y ago
Isn't this still confined to what a terminal gives you right now (as it is using current terminal specifications)? While certainly colorful and fancy, it doesn't really introduce new concepts, does it? I mean, for starters:
222.
by ablob 4y ago
If then someone came and did the fraud, there wouldn't be an amount of 0.
223.
by ablob 4y ago
There aren't too many keyboards with a ¢ key included, so I suppose that alone could be a show stopper.
224.
by ablob 4y ago
Yet I can give you an estimate of the runtime of multiple programs I use to an accuracy within seconds (order of magnitude is hours). The halting problem itself is a good estimate for computational complexity (i.e. can my thing simulate a
225.
by ablob 4y ago
Given that we live on a timeline it is useful for sure. Having a dotfile automatically marked as hidden for example is a useful combination that keeps learned traditions when preferred. > that's unnecessarily surprising. I found it
226.
by ablob 4y ago
How is it harmful? > A program is whatever the human beings who maintain that program operate against This does neither invalidate the statement that "Program is not a text", nor that "[it is] a model". > And for t
227.
by ablob 4y ago
You probably cant test it anymore, but I think it might have had something to do with the keys. I had a similar problem with failing upgrades once, until I updated the keyring.
228.
by ablob 4y ago
LocalLow is just %LocalAppData% for low privillege programs. The Roaming folder (%appdata%) is for platform independent data, and the LocalAppdata folder fo platform specific data. You can find the appdata folder in your userhome "C:Us
229.
by ablob 4y ago
I still think it is a mistake which you may be repeating by conflating two concepts: - The location of a file - Standard visibility of the file If you hide something (like a folder) temporarily and refer to it through a script, you have t