ablob

10 ms·

91.
by ablob 10mo ago
It definietly includes myself, I don't have the interest to stay updated here. For that matter I have no opinion on if AI does think or not, I simply don't care. Therefore I also really can't answer your question in what more
92.
by ablob 10mo ago
Well first of all I never claimed that I was capable of thinking (smirk). We also haven't agreed on a definition of "thinking" yet, so as you can read in my previous comment, there is no meaningful conversation to be had. I a
93.
by ablob 10mo ago
Usually it is the work of the one claiming something to prove it. So if you believe that AI does "think" you are expected to show me that it really does. Claiming it "thinks - prove otherwise" is just bad form and also o
94.
by ablob 10mo ago
Caveat: if thinking is definable, then not all statements about it are unverifiable.
95.
by ablob 10mo ago
It's a question of entropy. Data is rarely truly random and for larger data there is a lot higher chance of having this "unrandomness" occur. If your data consists of 4 kilobytes of just 00_01, then you gain a lot by just rem
96.
by ablob 10mo ago
I feel like tailored treatments are a desired path anyway. Instead of having a one-size-fits-all I'd rather have a process made to fit everyone. While the "nose" would not fit other dogs; "make nose that fits other dog&q
97.
by ablob 10mo ago
The post is about changing the serialization-format so enforcing contracts becomes esier; and I am defending the post, so I don't understand what you're hinting at here.
98.
by ablob 10mo ago
I feel like that's fine since both things go hand in hand anyway. And if choosing the JSON-format comes with a rather high amount of contract-breaches it might just be easier to switch that instead of fixing the contract.
99.
by ablob 10mo ago
Its probably the Archive if you follow the link
100.
by ablob 11mo ago
It's true for new projects. For rewrites (such as a shell) it can mean a lot of regressions. The rust-replacements for coreutils are a good negative example. The new programs do not reach feature-parity, added regressions, and in some
101.
by ablob 11mo ago
"Steering for more simplicity" would be a political decision. Keeping it is also a political decision. Removing a feature that is used, while possibly making chrome more "simple", also forces all the users of that featur
102.
by ablob 11mo ago
By the definitions given they can not, as no function subsumes another. By whatever you define as "compiler" maybe, but I see no point in this kind of interaction that essentially boils down to subsumtion to an entity you refuse t
103.
by ablob 11mo ago
Surely you don't expect someonoe that uses a particular piece of software only during work to donate to that from their own salary.
104.
by ablob 1y ago
What's your threat model?
105.
by ablob 1y ago
I think it never took off and is not supported by many if not most routers. However, it is an efficient solution for sending live-stream data over the web. I think eventually the pressure to not send packets for each consumer but at most on
106.
by ablob 1y ago
Multicast enters the room
107.
by ablob 1y ago
Afaik the F# supports do notation through computation expressions.
108.
by ablob 1y ago
I found a solution I am happy with. Based on my research into this it is a problem I'm not alone with. I do concede that writing your own analyzers is unusual (which is why i wrote that it's fine for simple setups). At the same ti
109.
by ablob 1y ago
I used to think there's nothing wrong with them either. For simple setups it is very painless. However, I recently stumbled into a use case where setting up the project file is a huge hassle and very error prone as well. Mainly I wante
110.
by ablob 1y ago
if you pick a value you have to store it, and if you have to store it it might spill into memory when register allocation fails. Moving from register-only to stack/heap usage easily slows down your program by an order of magnitude or t
111.
by ablob 1y ago
Maybe take the best of both worlds: "It's just kernel smoothing, which is a weighted mean of a continuous learned kv-map lookup." Now you got the definition, and the alternative naming you can use to search for resources.
112.
by ablob 1y ago
Now I am aware that answering the question is np-hard, but why (and how) is it equivalent to solving the halting problem?
113.
by ablob 1y ago
I distinctly remember having to install a package before audio would work on my machine. Needless to say, that isn't the best option if you can't rely on your eyes to find out what's missing. Unfortunately, I'm not knowl
114.
by ablob 1y ago
Did you read the article?
115.
by ablob 1y ago
As far as I know tacking on security after the fact usually leads to issues. It should be a primary concern from the beginning. Even if you don't do it 100% right, you'd be surprised how many issues you can avoid by thinking about
116.
by ablob 1y ago
You can always build it yourself and put the binary somewhere in your runtime path.
117.
by ablob 1y ago
Funny enough, I believe that there are quite a lot of tutorials and that itself is the issue. Everyone wants to make their own since they deem the others to be bad and then a new subpar tutorial is created, making it even more difficult to
118.
by ablob 1y ago
I was answering with the purposes of flight-taxis in mind. I doubt that they will fly in high altitude and deem it quite likely that they might want to pass uncontrolled airspace at some point. And if you're flying in uncontrolled airs
119.
by ablob 1y ago
Not every airplane does that. Commercial planes mostly do, but its not mandated under all circumstances as far as I know. (Speaking for my region only)
120.
by ablob 1y ago
I'm not sure you can avoid birds like a skateboad running onto the street. If anything I expect dynamic avoid areas or timed "no fly" zones depending on bird mass. Maneuvering to avoid birds seems like a recipe for disaster.

More ›