Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ablekh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
181.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
How 2 MB could be considered heavy, when visiting most websites results in much larger sizes of downloaded resources?
182.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Thank you very much for sharing your DI experience. What is wrong with using IServiceProvider dependency? What is CTOR (hierarchy)?
183.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Would most people here agree that .NET is a much better platform for developing applications with a plugin-based architecture (which, I think, more or less, implies following Hexagonal aka Clean Architecture / Ports and Adapters Patter
184.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
In the .NET context, browser-targeted deployments can have a minimal download overhead of around 2 MB, which is a far cry from 50 MB. How? Blazor. For details, see https://blog.ndepend.com/blazor-internals-you-need-to-know .
185.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Pretty fascinating story. There is so much that I don't know, including history. Learning something new every day ...
186.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Just to clarify: while there exist an original HN discussion from 2015 ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9336392 ), I was curious to know what people here think about this equity allocation (incentive) approach at the pr
187.
▲
Introducing Progressive Equity (2015)
(medium.com)
3 points
by
ablekh
6y ago
|
1 comments
188.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
> the dems don't want to work together or compromise at all This is such a ridiculous statement that I even won't bother replying to it beyond this comment. > If both sides can't agree, nothing happens. The gov is essen
189.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
The control is needed at this particular time, because the history clearly shows that the current Republican majority and their leader are not only unwilling to collaborate with Democrats, but are simply stonewalling the process (see commen
190.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
> In that context, I am not sure I understand the point about "wealthy people [don't] comprise a majority of relevant party representatives' aggregate constituency". It is quite simple. "Around two-thirds of regi
191.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
There is some truth to what you're saying. However, regarding your non-partisan voting argument, I can say - and that's what I meant in my previous comments - that non-partisan voting was pronounced during previous congressional t
192.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
What some classify as "messing up the system", others might classify as "progress" or "benefit to the people". So, it's a moot point. "Their real constituencies" (emphasis mine) - I assume that
193.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
The following definition that was shared by someone on Quora is quite good, though a bit academic. Moral fabric is "a metaphor for the flexible but still assured structure of virtue that forms the basis of integrity and holds society
194.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Regardless of whether you call gridlock a feature or something else, I think that it should be used to the benefit of the people. Unfortunately, too many times it is used not to the benefit of the relevant constituents, but for playing poli
195.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Not exactly. That is why I have mentioned above words "collaborate" and "compromise".
196.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Well, let me literally reproduce my other comment in this thread, which was a reply to another person. It is not that easy to find, so, for your convenience, I'm reposting it below. While it talks about "checks and balances"
197.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
I don't make any assumptions about any unilateral moral authority on issues. That is why I call for a constructive dialog at all levels and across all groups of our society. As for your argument on checks and balances - yes, generally,
198.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
I don't think that my post promotes an idea senators have to vote in accordance with my opinion on issues. The point I was trying to make is that there is a very real threat of gridlock in the Congress (especially, considering the voti
199.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
I sincerely believe that there is definitely some common ground. Otherwise I would not have posted that thought. Is it easy to find that common ground? Of course, not. Will it take a lot of time and effort (from all sides)? Absolutely. Bu
200.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
OK, so the transition from Make America Great Again slogan to Make America Decent Again (and Better) reality is inevitable and welcome. It is easy to get overjoyed by results of the U.S. Presidential Election (and some celebration certainly
201.
▲
Quick Thoughts on GPT3
(delian.substack.com)
1 points
by
ablekh
6y ago
|
0 comments
202.
▲
What do good Engineering Managers do? They taste the soup
(no-kill-switch.ghost.io)
5 points
by
ablekh
6y ago
|
0 comments
203.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Yes, Pulumi is compatible with Terraform providers. However, it is a declarative backend compatibility. In terms of imperative frontend, as I said, Pulumi team has both first mover advantage as well as singular focus on their product, unlik
204.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Thank you, will keep it in mind. However, Terraform CDK is far from being production-ready at the present time. Moreover, I would venture to guess that it will trail Pulumi in terms of both features and maturity (due to Pulumi team's
205.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
I agree with you on Terraform and Pulumi (I'm especially excited about the latter, due to extra benefits over Terraform). However, I think that you are missing the main point / theme of the post - it is not specifically about AWS&
206.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
:-)
207.
▲
AWS hearts multi-cloud? It's gonna happen
(cloudirregular.substack.com)
78 points
by
ablekh
6y ago
|
36 comments
208.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
I've been in tech and academia for 25+ years combined, with tech being a larger portion of that time frame. On one hand, I understand your stance. On the other hand, I think that you are overreacting and, more importantly, looking at t
209.
▲
by
ablekh
6y ago
Well, this is not terribly surprising, considering TypeScript's origins in Microsoft. Not adding full IDE support for their core languages (.NET) to VS Code is understandable as well, though - the company does not want to jeopardize sa
210.
▲
In a World with No Encryption Keys: Shamir’s No-Key Protocol
(medium.com)
2 points
by
ablekh
6y ago
|
0 comments
More ›