abduhl

7 ms·

91.
by abduhl 2y ago
This ground support method is called spiling, for those interested.
92.
by abduhl 2y ago
Cut and cover is what I said. Your definition (cover then dig) makes no sense. Cover what? If you haven't dug first then there's nothing to cover.
93.
by abduhl 2y ago
Cut and cover is what I described: excavate down, build the structure, cover it up. I am aware that there are lots of options, you can browse my comment history and see that I probably have more experience designing and constructing underg
94.
by abduhl 2y ago
This is not cut and cover. Cut and cover is when you "cut" an excavation from the ground surface down and then "cover" it back up with dirt after constructing the structure you want below ground. You have linked to an
95.
EU rules to improve Gender Balance in corporate boards enter into application(ec.europa.eu)
6 points by abduhl 2y ago|1 comments
96.
by abduhl 2y ago
It appears that your ignorance on the topics of infrastructure and the advancement of technology over the past five decades makes having a useful conversation impossible. Not every cable in the ground was installed with today's state
97.
by abduhl 2y ago
From the first google result (although this was 5 years ago): “Europe gave internet service providers the right to throttle online traffic to prevent congestion as network demand spikes amid coronavirus stay-at-home and quarantine orders. N
98.
by abduhl 2y ago
And does your cheap and easy to set up 10gbps fiber LAN cross under the interstate 10 feet deep?
99.
by abduhl 2y ago
No, the court never reaches these because the court holds that “a provider need only offer the ‘capability’ of manipulating information (in the ways recited in that subsection) to offer an ‘information service’ under § 153(24)” and “Even un
100.
by abduhl 2y ago
I can see that you are extremely emotionally invested in this decision for some reason, but there’s no need to resort to these type of hysterical personal attacks. I have no horse in this race, I am just providing the apparently persuasive
101.
by abduhl 2y ago
We can read the brief from the petitioners for the (apparently winning) response to this on p 38 of https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca6.151... “That exception focuses on inward-facing controls. But
102.
by abduhl 2y ago
We can read the brief from the petitioners starting on p 32 of https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca6.151... Looking at p 36, two information services offered are caching and DNS.
103.
by abduhl 2y ago
Was this post written by the Turkish marketing team?
104.
by abduhl 2y ago
No, your position is: "I think it would be a good idea to create an explicit carve out in the law saying that there is no premise liability for a property owner or event organizer due to a third party committing a crime." and &quo
105.
by abduhl 2y ago
I was only responding to GP's statement that common law can be overridden by statute. If I wanted to respond to the idea that premises liability should be eliminated then I would have responded to your first post. And I actually do thi
106.
by abduhl 2y ago
This is a stupid point. “The current law can easily be overridden by passing a new law.” No shit.
107.
by abduhl 2y ago
What is the relationship between this blog post and the H1-B visa program? And are you saying that Twitter has exploited the H-1B program to erode user protections? It seems like you're just trying to shoehorn some kind of unrelated a
108.
by abduhl 2y ago
This question is pedantic but I’ll ask it anyways: is it actually illegal to take an unapproved drug? Sale of, marketing for, distribution, etc. all might be (are?) illegal but is TAKING an unapproved drug illegal? I can’t believe it is, t
109.
by abduhl 2y ago
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
110.
by abduhl 2y ago
>> Even if zero is the bottom, an asset can have unlimited downside. It can go from $0.1 per share to $0.0001 per share and so on without end. Or, with the rational perspective, after 0 the downside does not matter anymore. An asset c
111.
by abduhl 2y ago
>> [Roth IRA stuff] Debating the availability of a Roth backdoor is something that's orthogonal to the discussion. I agree that your $46k number is the correct number, so adjust the numbers in my prior post as appropriate (e.g.,
112.
by abduhl 2y ago
You can back door around $70k per year into a Roth currently I believe. I don’t know where you’re from, but few people would say that isn’t much. And I’m not sure why you’re talking about LEAPS. Options are naturally leveraged: you have syn
113.
by abduhl 2y ago
To be blunt, the way you express yourself on this topic comes off as very "enlightened intellectual." It's clear that you think that your views/assumptions are the correct view and any other view is one held by the &quo
114.
by abduhl 2y ago
Most audiences wouldn’t like freshly butchered cow - freshly butchered meat is tough and not very flavorful, it needs to be aged to allow it to tenderize and develop.
115.
by abduhl 2y ago
You think the death penalty is an exercise of ultimate power? It’s more an exercise of vengeance. The ultimate exercise of government power is keeping someone locked in a tiny cell for the rest of their life where their bed is next to the
116.
by abduhl 2y ago
With the proper mix of retirement accounts, options, and futures contracts it can. It can offer even more leverage if you want.
117.
by abduhl 2y ago
The Declaration of Independence doesn't actually say that. It says that everyone is endowed with certain unalienable rights including the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Everyone has the right to life, liberty, a
118.
by abduhl 2y ago
>> the hardest part of it is navigating controls around what the navy allows civvies to touch. Well, that and using the proper PPE so that you probably won't even have any lasting injuries or bodily damage and taking your time&
119.
by abduhl 2y ago
No. Guess we're at an impasse on this topic.
120.
by abduhl 2y ago
Define what a livable wage is then. Is it $25/hr? $50/hr? $100/hr?

More ›