Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
abalashov
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
151.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
... no. As someone who has had both, I can tell you there's _quite_ a difference.
152.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
I take that as a given, too, especially considering the diabolical architecture of Miller Thought.
153.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
This is insane. I cannot fathom how I, nor educated and talented people I know, could have possibly stayed in the US back in the day if this requirement had been in place then. Applying for a greencard while working on an H, J or O-class vi
154.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
> Once they hit a wall, that is where you find out whether they are motivated or not Yep. That has to happen first.
155.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
Because it's "easy"?
156.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
Yeah, I know. Was just throwing it out to see what folks would say based on their idea of useful.
157.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
They kept telling us Soviet central planning was inefficient and ineffective, while the lean rationality of the free market something something...
158.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
How much would one have to invest in hardware to feasibly run a usefully large Kimi K2.6?
159.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
Why do you... seem so sure that this is a ridiculous statement?
160.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
I am impressed that Graeber made his way into this conversation (and the author's article), and really appreciate your take. I think about "Bullshit Jobs" every time I hear someone tell me how lean, efficient and rational the
161.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
I self-host because I'm not training some model for free with our and our customers' proprietary code.
162.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
Go is less a language than a philosophy. It was an angry reaction to 10,000 ways to do things, and overly clever (ahem, expressive) syntactic sugar. It is quite boring to write, but very easy to read. Not a Go fanatic. I use Go and various
163.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
And they have a suspiciously well-appointed MCP server.
164.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
I have an M4 Max MBP with w/128 GB of RAM, and have been very into local models. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has been very kind to me for almost any purpose. No, it's no Opus 4.7, but it's shockingly good, and I don't have to share
165.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
You'd be surprised how far you can get with self-hosted Gitea.
166.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
This is an unexpectedly apt comparison, and I appreciated it.
167.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
That sort of syntactic sugar goes against the Go philosophy. Don't get me wrong, I share your frustration, but I also see the value of consistency in their philosophy.
168.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
I laughed hard!
169.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
That may indeed look like quite the speed-up. But the accumulated errors and entropy in such an enterprise will eventually cause a cave-in, at which point the productivity metrics don't look so good.
170.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
This is exactly my conclusion, to the letter.
171.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
No, humans don't produce 100% reasonable code, but the nature of human mistakes, foibles and unreasonableness is very different from the kind slop farming yields.
172.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
It's nice to know I'm not alone in this. I have definitely used slop as inspiration by negative example.
173.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
I went back to writing code by hand quite some time ago and cannot say there has been any loss of velocity or productivity for it. I really do think this whole thing is a wash.
174.
▲
by
abalashov
5mo ago
I work by myself and feel no joy in using AI.
175.
▲
by
abalashov
6mo ago
Great article! I use LLMs 99.9% in the chat box, to bounce ideas around, ask research and reference questions, and so forth. However, I have sworn off 'agents' entirely for serious code, for reasons your article captures almost to
176.
▲
by
abalashov
6mo ago
There is an inescapable connection between the two. Knowing that stuff is not _equivalent_ to knowing good architecture, but it's hard to imagine what knowing good architecture would look like without being able to "think in code&
177.
▲
by
abalashov
6mo ago
One cannot build something robust just by thinking about it _a priori_, and while this was somewhat at the periphery of the author's argument, it is important.
178.
▲
by
abalashov
6mo ago
The problem there is the _large_ language model part, the density and the reinforcement of the weights. There's far less good code in the world. ;) These things emit code as well as I do, such as they do, only because they've inha
179.
▲
by
abalashov
6mo ago
> A generated piece of code is linguistically plausible but often unknowingly imitates common idioms so incoherently that the actual bug may be accidentally disguised in a way no sane human (even a bad programmer) could have come up with
180.
▲
by
abalashov
6mo ago
You stole what I was about to write out from under me. This is exactly it.
More ›