aatd86

7 ms·

91.
by aatd86 9mo ago
Interesting thought exercise, let me try something: Only if we can predict everything ourselves do we not have a choice. But since we don't know what we don't know and that may occur at any moment (black swan), we can only act giv
92.
by aatd86 9mo ago
That would be short-termist though. So, quite unlikely. In my usage (code) they are still better than everything else I have tried. Point being that I am looking predominantly for the one llm that gives me the best code output. If they risk
93.
by aatd86 9mo ago
I think we agree. The subtelty is that, it is about closed and open systems. Your partial knowledge makes things a locally open system. You are processing new data and then acting accordingly. That's dynamic agency. The better you can
94.
by aatd86 9mo ago
AI replacing workers and launching the post-money economy aside, it should probably not be about age or actual networth but outcome. That should still be a worthy and attainable goal. He is not the only rich person out there...
95.
by aatd86 9mo ago
This is very true but the path to that seems to require a weird optimization where it is concentrated among a few before being being widespread. Technologic improvements should help. Help decouple time and money.
96.
by aatd86 9mo ago
If you think you have no agency why do anything at all? You could choose to stop doing anything. Or you could decide that your partial knowledge(unrealised futures) gives you agency. It's a matter of metacognition. Being able to comput
97.
by aatd86 9mo ago
This is one of the easiest paths to gain a competitive advantage that can be monetized. You are much less likely to fall into a pool of money. Just like becoming a MD has much better odds at getting you some amount of money than dropping ou
98.
by aatd86 9mo ago
If you don't try you are sure to not win. The rest is about being able to put the odds in your favor. You obviously can't do that with lottery. There is no logical lever.
99.
by aatd86 9mo ago
He was in your spot at some point I've heard. Nothing is impossible.
100.
by aatd86 9mo ago
Yeah, unless it is a subtle message to convey that their autopilot is top notch haha
101.
by aatd86 9mo ago
got 12/31ms and 6/13ms cached so Cloudlfare muat not be that slow in Europe after all... ;)
102.
by aatd86 10mo ago
The metrics being the benchmarks? Perhaps but apparently these are being gamed. Which makes sense. It's the natural tendency of people. But in my daily usage? It's a fully different story.
103.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Interesting. Very first question you will probably be asked at some point: how different is it from solidjs?
104.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Not in my experience (I use them every day). GPT 5.1 (now 5.2) is absolutely much more accurate for coding tasks. I think that 5.1. might even be better than gemini 3. For PDF parsing and understanding, it's only anecdotal as it happen
105.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Caught up...??? I do use gemini pro regularly but never for code. chatGPT wins all the time. I even use chatGPT to review gemini suggestions... Seems that there has been a lot of hype because in many ways, they are still lagging behind.
106.
by aatd86 10mo ago
I'd posit that it is trying to wrestle it back actually. It lost it when their industries went abroad. From a global perspective this is good because it makes peace more sustainable if the world is interlinked and interconnected. Nati
107.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Except the js files can work in the browser as is.. not the ts one (fortunately I might add, I find ts syntax very loaded at times) Either one is superseding the other one, or they are simply distant cousins, but this is not interchangeable
108.
by aatd86 10mo ago
To not do what, to not implement a constraint solver for bidirectional formulas? If you input my above comment it is for sure going to weigh the pros and cons. https://gemini.google.com/share/f40bf53d9c21 Excerpt from
109.
by aatd86 10mo ago
LOL! Gemini suggested to implement this to me literally yesterday: bidirectional computations. The example was that given a temperature in Celsius and Fahrenheit, modifying either of them should update their counterpart. In angular that wo
110.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Not public yet. Under review.
111.
by aatd86 10mo ago
LOL. I must have divination powers. I am currently working on a UI framework and opened an issue just 3 weeks ago that says: *** Seems that server functions are all the rage. We are unlikely to have them. The main reason is that it ties the
112.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Maybe that's the whole point. Entities which rely on the product enough to propose contributions are more likely to be paying customers who really need to have a given feature available? People seem to complain that they are burnt out
113.
by aatd86 10mo ago
True. The counterpoint being that back in the days, they could have decided to write a parser if the data was structured and they would have then learnt things that they will never learn by relying on AI. For a junior in the learning phase
114.
by aatd86 10mo ago
The issue is that it might look good but an LLM often inserts weird mistakes. Or ellipses. Or overindex on the training data. If someone is not careful it is easy to completely wreck the codebase by piling on seemingly innocuous commits. So
115.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Thing is, speed is not linear. Sometimes, it's better to take the time of building the right foundations in order to propel yourself ahead later. Rather than building on a shaky base, rushing, and getting stuck after a while. I think t
116.
by aatd86 10mo ago
so it's react again in the end .. zzzzzzz
117.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Didn't know about codeberg and can't even access it... Is it https://codeberg.org/ ??
118.
by aatd86 10mo ago
Human intelligence is emergent from physical/material interactions. It is constant and self-evolutive. Artificial intelligence is data processing of a very limited number of inputs, ignoring all others. Less likely to become self-consc
119.
by aatd86 11mo ago
I had heard that as well. But it is never clear to me what it consists in exactly. What are the tell-tale signs/examples? I have probably met a lot of people who might be highly rated in terms of IQ but I haven't found anyone par
120.
by aatd86 11mo ago
Wondering what being 'smart' means? Is it: 1. being right most of the time? 2. knowing a lot (breadth)? 3. knowing a couple things in depth? 4. knowing in breadth and depth? 5. understanding new things fast (which is only measurab

More ›