aatd86

22 ms·

391.
by aatd86 3y ago
9% return? What do you invest in? Risk free?
392.
by aatd86 3y ago
Summary in simpler terms? So it's just because the actions in game where functions which were assigned an id and callable by id. Then because OP was able to reverse engineer that id generator, OP was able to call whatever he wanted onc
393.
by aatd86 3y ago
What if the brain can perceive more signals but that the most common signals are those that are "known" to be captured by the average of the population? To put it another way, there could also be cases where what is deemed an hal
394.
by aatd86 3y ago
There has to be an analogy... Like working in a register but sleeping on disk or something... Just can't find it
395.
by aatd86 3y ago
I don't know. On the producer side, a lot of us were on soundclick before soundcloud. Anyway, good luck with the sale. My soundcloud feels like an empty town only visited by promotional bots. People seem to be on tiktok and ig nowadays
396.
by aatd86 3y ago
Very good question. What do you think?
397.
by aatd86 3y ago
Made with svelte?! Where are the purists of the MPA and their pitchforks? ;)
398.
by aatd86 3y ago
Computable by who? Because you don't have the full list of correlations and there are superlinear things (tail events) you'll get a probabilistic estimation at best.
399.
by aatd86 3y ago
Yes, as long as the computer chooses its next set of instructions in order to maximize a given value (the objective), I would say that it acts on its own. Instruction set that was never defined by anyone that is. If the instruction set is l
400.
by aatd86 3y ago
I don't know if there is a quantum rng or just an inference machine that manages to recognize patterns within input data and can do some math sometimes.
401.
by aatd86 3y ago
Traditionally, a program is a series of instructions. The program doesn't really act on its own. Now, a program which is objective driven and can infer from new inputs might be something else. Just like humans try to maximize the stabi
402.
by aatd86 3y ago
As long as you can imagine different possible futures and decide upon which one you want to try and realize, I think you have choice. Choice stems from uncertainty, partial knowledge. It might be an illusion for an observer outside of the s
403.
by aatd86 3y ago
Doing things because you can and not because you have to? Creative endeavors in the largest sense?
404.
by aatd86 3y ago
Strangely enough, this dichotomy seems to exist only for the web platform. Everywhere else (desktop, mobile etc) the model is SPAs. The only reason people distinguish it for web is because of legacy: html + DOM, i.e. Documents. Documents do
405.
by aatd86 3y ago
We do not disagree. It's not necessarily faulty hardware but can be faulty software to reprise the initial expression. But the reasons for faulty software are not necessarily understood. (difference between a fault in structure vs. a f
406.
by aatd86 3y ago
Can also be malfunctioning hardware. Can even be externally induced. Transient bouts of attention deficit with perfectly normal MRI would indicate that something else is happening.
407.
by aatd86 3y ago
What do we really know (most of us) besides that we exist? Nothing. It's funny that a lot of people believe things they don't know about and most of them are judged perfectly sane :o) The only real thing I personally believe is ex
408.
by aatd86 3y ago
Wait, are the headers canonicalized if you retrieve them from r.Header where r is a request? I mean, if the safest is to conform to the html spec, there should be an escape hatch for the rarer cases easier than going all the way to the tcp
409.
by aatd86 3y ago
Are you sure they are discarded and unrecoverable? Can't that be simply recovered by using textproto.MIMEHeader and iterating over the header map? Seems that it could be a middleware away, I don't see the big deal if so.
410.
by aatd86 3y ago
The nerve to post a fake job ad, and interview you someone just to gaslight them. That's actually somewhat funny. Creative bullying of a whole new level.
411.
by aatd86 3y ago
It's an interesting opinion. I tend to believe there can be value in repetitive code patterns for recognition. It can make a language easier to read and understand although a bit more tedious to write. It's especially interesting
412.
by aatd86 3y ago
Not my experience (except for the Russ bit :o) I've actually been quite impressed by Ian's patience. People are at different levels of understanding and sometimes it's hard to communicate.
413.
by aatd86 3y ago
Headers are case-sensitive?
414.
by aatd86 3y ago
"Goa'uld found under icecap"
415.
by aatd86 3y ago
I'm not sure I fully understand what you're proposing? Is it about function purity or immutable values? I think the way to do the latter in Go is to not export the field and only have it modifiable by a dedicated method. (or even
416.
by aatd86 3y ago
It's a correlation, not a causation, in my experience. It's likely that the brain chooses the path of least resistance toward dopamine. Sometimes, just choosing to not be lazy clears it because then not being lazy and doing the da
417.
by aatd86 3y ago
Data is dynamic. Ok for old data. What about new data?
418.
by aatd86 3y ago
Well, the way I've seen it explained, seems like it's similar to being able to dereference some object locally to read a value (observation) but not having access to that global state between the two variables to write it (we don&
419.
by aatd86 3y ago
Seen iRobot once... tries to make self-driving cars and underground tunnels :o) I still want to see what is on the other end of the galaxy though. Requires more lifespan and faster than light/instantaneous data transmission. So some
420.
by aatd86 3y ago
They didn't get you, given the downvotes. Could at least have watched rush hour or something if they don't listen to music :-D

More ›