aatd86

15 ms·

271.
by aatd86 1y ago
In my opinion, first sin of react is that createElement should be a method of a document at best. There are a few things missing but jsx is sugar that complicates things for me. Just teach people function composition. It's easier.
272.
by aatd86 1y ago
I don't think that it is sound to incorporate a DSL that imitates html only approximately into a language. That should remain an external library at best. And that's irrespectively of my view on jsx, the latter which I find non e
273.
by aatd86 1y ago
That's a lack of financial sense. In finance, we learn about the time value of money. Code allows someone to go faster. This is literally a repository of time. So it is valuable. When I look at coders, I sometimes get the sense of them
274.
by aatd86 1y ago
because react decided to return JSX like element syntax instead of being simply a function returning a dom element doesn't mean that this should be standardized.
275.
by aatd86 1y ago
no.but if I ask for a report in natural language, the AI needs to be able to write sql.
276.
by aatd86 1y ago
Yes but the AI is not creating these components from zero is it (on demand part)? It will probably have access to a list of components with their specifications, especially the type of data that the components allow to mutably (or not) repr
277.
by aatd86 1y ago
No I read the post. I had actually read it before I think even. But I am not convinced by the on demand part. Isn't on demand what chat llms already do nowadays btw? point being that generating visual UI components is easy. chatgpt doe
278.
by aatd86 1y ago
because you really think the AI can predict the perfect UX for human consumption out of the blue instead of simply using human made components? AI or not won't change these sorts of UI too much.
279.
by aatd86 1y ago
there is no benefit in it being AI generated though. There is a closed set of interaction behaviors. When you want to order a pizza, you won't have to click. Just browse and ask the AI assistant to place an order as you would in a rest
280.
by aatd86 1y ago
that's not a very innovative idea or even better UX. I think that the future wil have to do with voice commands and mcps will be the backend, exposing capabilities.
281.
by aatd86 1y ago
Isn't entanglement in quantum physics the manifestation of shared state? tongue-in-cheek
282.
by aatd86 1y ago
And now with mcp...should make sure to not allow agents access to sensitive capabilities.
283.
by aatd86 1y ago
reminds me of stargate sg1
284.
by aatd86 1y ago
I wasn't targeting the SAS specifically. This seems to be pervasive across armies. Just read the Human Rights Watch reports.
285.
by aatd86 1y ago
True. Not a big issue in practice and there are linters and whatnot. Variable shadowing can happen. But it's a bit orthogonal of a concern. I do have things to say about errors but my complaints are a bit more nuanced and made with hin
286.
by aatd86 1y ago
Not C. C errors are different since they are simply numbers. And spoiler alert, every language propagates errors. Sometimes automatically via exception handling, somewhat simply by returning error values. rust does this too. Matter fact, ev
287.
by aatd86 1y ago
Some army officers and potentially those who rely on the information they provide.
288.
by aatd86 1y ago
There must have been a misunderstanding. I wasn't speaking about the journalists. They are doing their reporting as they should.
289.
by aatd86 1y ago
I don't understand what it can be used for. Is this for accessibility? Or a new UI building paradigm?
290.
by aatd86 1y ago
hehehe. reminds me of if err != nil in Go which is really not an issue in my opinion. But it seems to have become somewhat infamous in some circles.
291.
by aatd86 1y ago
Drawing a legitimate parallel and questioning the legitimacy of what we know and what we are being told is hardly 'whataboutism'. Especially when it might be geo-strategic. I find your accusation severe. The news colported these p
292.
by aatd86 1y ago
Where am I making excuses? The point is you can't criticize others when you do the same exact thing you are criticizing. Beyond that it's also legitimate to doubt the info one gets from people who are obviously hypocritical. That&
293.
by aatd86 1y ago
then yhey criticize the wagner militia but they are not any better apparently. Maybe it's even hearsay.
294.
by aatd86 1y ago
I wonder why the author left Go out of his list of examples of language stewardship.
295.
by aatd86 1y ago
turns out that using composition and polymorphism is usually simpler than inheritance in such cases.
296.
by aatd86 1y ago
Could have written further into set theory and set theoretic interpretation of types. A proposition being a set intension.
297.
by aatd86 2y ago
Ha!
298.
by aatd86 2y ago
No backward compatibility?!
299.
by aatd86 2y ago
One should remain curious and improve.
300.
by aatd86 2y ago
Isn't it supposed to be c for celerity? Edit.. Oh I see. Nvm

More ›