aantthony

17 ms·

31.
by aantthony 6y ago
One of the author's points (for example) was that "Experts get things wrong for reasons that are innocent", gave a few examples why and explained how this means Facebook's process has a central problem due to its emphasi
32.
by aantthony 6y ago
You mentioned "how Italy got overrun", so I was talking about the timeframe that you brought up. I'm not trying to change the subject.
33.
by aantthony 6y ago
Youtube is responsible for the harm here IMO. The video is long and boring. If it wasn't being censored, nobody would care to pay any attention to it.
34.
by aantthony 6y ago
Yeah I agree that is very dangerous, although that is exactly what governments and most TV channels were saying at the time.
35.
by aantthony 6y ago
There's a very strong aversion towards anyone with different views on this subject. I'm not convinced its solely due to a lack of data. Low sample size studies have been around for a while, but the aversion on this is so much stro
36.
by aantthony 6y ago
From Wikipedia: “In the U.S., Verizon is using 28 GHz and AT&T is using 39 GHz. 5G can use frequencies of up to 300 GHz”[1]. That is high frequency relative to the frequencies of 4G, and WiFI or Bluetooth which are around 2-4 GHz.[2] No
37.
by aantthony 6y ago
I think most people tend to have an innate need for answers and don’t like having unknowns. The institutions used to fill that gap, but now it’s back since the institutions violated that trust. Educated people are still able to find other m
38.
by aantthony 6y ago
Could you share that information, if you don’t mind. I was trying to figure out if the radiation is safe but I couldn’t find anything on the effects of the high frequency signals.
39.
by aantthony 6y ago
Is there any reason to believe the dangers of the presumed misinformation being censored are actually significant? Is it killing more people than the Tide pod challenge for example? The article mentions taking vitamin C, and turmeric, but t
40.
by aantthony 6y ago
I think there is a big difference between content moderation (based on published and reasonably objective rules) and an outright ban on contradicting the stance of an organisation that is highly political. If this rule was implemented earli
41.
by aantthony 6y ago
It's not just Youtube, it's also Twitter[1] and Facebook[2]. When they all act in concert with each other, it's much harder to hold them accountable. I think censorship can be dangerous in this context so I'm working on
42.
by aantthony 6y ago
Law should be objectively decidable. Thousands upon thousands of pages of enigmatic legalistic nonsense make it impossible to predict a legal decision. When there is this much law, it becomes a paradox where the result is actually lawless -
43.
by aantthony 7y ago
Haven’t heard if that’s going ahead. But I’m working on a similar concept: https://verifact.io which will be launching soon
44.
by aantthony 7y ago
It's not about the existing evidence it's about the lack thereof, and thus it must be considered as a possibility. To do otherwise is an extremely dangerous assumption. It's valid point and I don't see that as scaremonge
45.
by aantthony 7y ago
I have no problem with stating undisputed facts. The point is the claim about Trump is portrayed as undisputed, when it clearly is disputed. So if someone said "It is undeniable that the Earth is flat and anyone who supports the idea o
46.
by aantthony 7y ago
When they say "Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy" as if it were an undisputed fact, and without any argument at all, it really shows how they're incapable of considering an alternat
47.
by aantthony 7y ago
It seems the AirPods do this. It will delay the video so that it’s in sync. It might already be in the protocol.
48.
by aantthony 10y ago
"If this is just a learned relationship between things, the order of the adjectives shouldn't matter" Why not? Couldn't the order also be a learned relationship?
49.
by aantthony 11y ago
"NPR, along with the NAB, has been part of a lobbying effort to require this free radio feature to be enabled." I don't want an FM radio on my phone because the internet is a superior system 99% of the time. If Apple doesn&#x
50.
by aantthony 12y ago
I've been using Safari without flash for a while now, and it used to be like that, but lately it's been extremely rare to find any which aren't html5 compatible.
51.
by aantthony 13y ago
It wasn't mentioned in the article, but Galt's Gulch Chile was founded by Jeff Berwick the tech entrepreneur who co-founded the Bitcoin ATM project, and also stockhouse.com in the 90's.
52.
by aantthony 13y ago
Yep, I'm changing it to equation.io as soon as I get the new one working.
53.
by aantthony 14y ago
I think these are done in bursts specifically to cause lag. Nobody would bother to buy 0.1 BTC in 100 separate orders at the same price. Often the orders are cancelled anyway.
54.
by aantthony 14y ago
Doesn't 'arms' include both the weapons and ammunition though?
55.
by aantthony 14y ago
Seems they have posted it for other states also: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petitions
56.
by aantthony 14y ago
It only depends on your definition, which will always end up being twisted for political purposes anyway. I would say a free market is one without coercion, and capitalism is when private property rights over the means of production are wel
57.
by aantthony 15y ago
Nice, but I find Wolfram Alpha faster and easier to use: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=12%3A30pm+PT
58.
by aantthony 15y ago
Also, in the "Technical troubleshooting" page ( http://help.abr.gov.au/content.asp?sid=42&doc=/content/1... ) Problem: "Screen not displaying properly", Solution: Your display is not set to 800 x 600 pixels. Haha. What's even more pathe
59.
by aantthony 15y ago
Does anyone else think that this is just convoluted and confusing?
60.
by aantthony 15y ago
The right to keep and bear arms is also similar. That right doesn't entitle you to free guns.

More ›