Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aDyslecticCrow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
91.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
> Training a large language model and privacy law as it's written today cannot coexist If they aren't compatible, then the conclusion is abundantly obvious; the LLM has to go, not privacy. Small and questionable economic utilit
92.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Considering how much of modern software is written in JavaScript and python, I have a hard time seeing how lisp overhead would pose much of a problem. Erlang is good enough for telecom equipment for 30 years ago, so that also gives us a dat
93.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
One AI workflow I rather like seems to have largely vanished from many modern tools. Use a very dumb simple model with syntax knowledge to autocomplete. It fills out what I'm about to type, and takes local variables and pass them to fu
94.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
If web-pages don't contain the answer, the AI likely won't either. But the AI will confidently tell me "the answer" anyway. I've had atrocious issues with wrong or straight up invented information that I must search
95.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
There are two more quotes that made me giggle; > You can verify code quality as a glance, and ship absolute with confidence. > You can confidently trust and merge the code without hours of manual review. I couldn't possibly imagi
96.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
clankers.
97.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Computers beat us in maths decades ago, yet LLMs are not able to beat a calculator half of the time. The maths benchmarks that companies so proudly show off are still the realm of a traditional symbolic solvers. You claiming much success in
98.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
I wouldn't underestimate Eclipse user statistics. That may sound insane in 2025, but I've seen a lot of heavily customized eclipse editors still kicking around for vendor specific systems, setting aside that Java is still a pretty
99.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
If we cannot tax the money before it accumulates too high, there is little hope getting it afterwards. But taxing it too early penalise entrepreneurship. Tax large properties and excessive luxury seems like one of the few methods could work
100.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Sweden cut the wealth tax, and got a very high startup to capital ratio; but a rapidly rising wealth gap as a consequence. That wealth came from the local economy so it's reasonable to think it should return. But in practice there does
101.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
I think stores will adjust their prices pretty quick if they cannot even aquire pennies to give as change. So no law should be needed. you may need to stipulate a grace period during which stores are still obligated to take pennies, to slow
102.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
you can make a signed readonly linux installation, and restrict your games to it. this would be like "support steamos but not linux". Or deliver the game as a container format, like snap or appimage to bypass most of the system. O
103.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
They're very valuable data, and it's convenient to log in to see a previous chat. If you have ever played with the api, its clear as day that the protocol itself is stateless.
104.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
This is a issue of critical mass. With the continued growth of steamos, steamdeck, and linux as a game platform, eventually it will pull over support.
105.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
lets hope not. This is long overdue and should pose relatively little issue compared to most other recent questionable executive orders. stop minting and stop accepting is commonly separated to allow adjustment. so likely a later president
106.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Fourier transfer.
107.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
I have a family member working in hospital setting. Electronics bairly survive a year from the amount of disinfectant they're exposed to. Everything is wiped so constantly that anything not made for the environment has its lettering st
108.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Really? How large is your project? There is a very clear point in codebase size where LLMs tend to falter without very clear written down overview descriptions of the system structure. I have a hard time seeing that this system would be imm
109.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
This is a nice idea in theory. But you need excellent docs in the firstplace for it to work. And if a human spent painstaking effort writing excellent docs, the least bit of respect i can give them is read it.
110.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Websites absolutely spontaneously send letters, or advertising flyers. The company could be from china or Russia with little interest in diplomatic pandering for such a small incident. Providing a user a service in exchange for payment is a
111.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
just because a law is difficult to enforce doesn't make it not exist. There are laws for this, and they are enforced. If you aint caught its not illegal?
112.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
> Which is actually how all law has mostly worked from day one. Internet but not for any other commerce. If you sell products to someone in the EU, you are liable to EU laws about that product category and commercial activity. The intern
113.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Then no country should have legal authority over companies operating in the country but based internationally. You could earn a lot of money by selling unregistered firearms, pipe bombs or drugs over the internet and sending it over the bor
114.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
If someone writes you a letter than they have your family hostage, and to route 50.000 dollars thorough bitcoin to not have them killed, with a AI generated video as proof; are they scott free because they're not based in the US?
115.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
> If I'm operating a Web site in country A, I should not have to care about country B's laws Not defending UK's idiotic laws, but this doesn't hold. If you cannot regulate websites outside of the country of origin, th
116.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Out of pocket? Perhaps not, especially if it "works" as intended. Putting your life in danger and house burnt down though? More likely than you realize. Could I interest you in some very durable car fuses that don't actually
117.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Previous discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45784455 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45756599
118.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
This is brilliant and oddly obvious in hindsight. Measured valuable almost always have noise, and equations rarely solve to true zero. Setting a small delta is common practice, but these graphs show that some equations may have odd behaviou
119.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Ye i didn't even think about advanced meetings summary bots. Just raw word for word transcription please. Wispr is pretty great.
120.
▲
by
aDyslecticCrow
11mo ago
Neither copilot nor flow can natively handle audio to my understanding, so there is already a transcription model converting it to text that then GPT tries to summarise. It could be they simply use a mediocre transcription model. Wispr is a
More ›