_kbh_

96 ms·

931.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
Thats true, the world for the sake of the world economy should be doing as much as it possibly can to end this war as soon as possible in Ukraines favour.
932.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
I think it’s important to draw a distinction here. Whilst America’s war of aggression was in no real way justifiable, Russia is on an entire another level. The Russians rape, loot and pillage with either impunity or active support from thei
933.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
What deceit did NATO governments that justifies, invading raping and systematically destroying a country?. Russias war of aggression falls firmly on the shoulders of only Russia. We are lucky that Russia is so terrible at war, if they where
934.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
I’m not sure that physical only vectors on iOS and Android go for they kind of money it probably needs to remote. I do think that the bounty is underpaid but not by that much it should probably be closer to 100k.
935.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
_failed coup_ the guys with bigger weapons were waiting around but it all fizzled out so it never materialised. just read this to see what they where waiting around with. https://www.npr.org/2021/03/19/9778795
936.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
nearly every security feature in existence has known (situation dependent) work arounds. That does not mean you should turn them off.
937.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
Isn't Rosetta 2 the opposite of libhoundini? (translating from x86 to ARM, instead of ARM to x86), I also fail to see how an application that has its roots in a PPC to x86 translator (Rosetta 1) from 2006, is somehow a rip off of an ap
938.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
In hindsight this is probably a lot easier.
939.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
the attack here is to just invert the compares for all the checks, which means it'll accept any certificate thats not the original, then you can MitM all the traffic with only minor changes to the binary.
940.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
I find it hard to believe that a flag ship of a navy that was repaired in 2020 and was set to be in use until 2040, was meant to be scuttled in 2022. https://tass.com/defense/1173927
941.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
per the definition of genocide that I found on the UN's website, they are easily committing at least one of the points that defines a genocide. That is - Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. https://
942.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
But the targeting of a specific ethnic group, because they are that ethnic group is, isn't it?. I think this is a pretty good article on the topic, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61017352 and presents both
943.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
Russia intentionally targets civilians in Ukraine, because they are Ukrainian, how does that not meet the definition of genocide? which is. `Genocide is the intentional destruction of a people — usually defined as an ethnic, national, racia
944.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
The de-escalation is simple, Russia leaves all parts of Ukraine that is has occupied since 2014. It return they stop losing troops and armour at a rate which will end their armies existence entirely before the end of the year.
945.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
Im not sure what a war in Iraq that didn't even involve NATO has to do with Russia raping and pillaging across Ukraine, but the real question is how many countries does Russia get to rape and pillage in your world until the world decid
946.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
How does countries joining a defensive alliance threaten Russia?. Maybe if Russia stopped invading all its neighbours and all the prior USSR states, these states would stop joining NATO. The only thing NATO stops is Russian imperialism.
947.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
Russia gets to rattle their cyber sabre is what this lets them do. Why do they rattle their sabre? because it has been literally the only thing they are doing in response to this war. Since day one all Russia has done is sabre rattle about
948.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
Even with men on the ground how useful is a tank, when someone can use a remotely controlled ATGM that can hit targets upto ~5km away?.
949.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
The Russian tank with the most losses in Ukraine is the T-72B3 obr.2016. This is the most recent variant of the T-72 that the Russians use (and started production in 2016) and has the same armour as the T-90MS which started production in 20
950.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
The largest exporter of arms to Ukraine at this point in time is likely Russia. I fail to see how this isn't a disaster. The Ukrainian tank divisions are likely better equipped than they where when the war started.
951.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
Hospitals likely have some of the worst IT environments around, its unsurprising. When it's a choice between IT and more doctors, hospitals are likely to choose more doctors.
952.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
> With every conventional defeat faced by the Russian military and with the massive loss of credibility this causes, at what point does Russia decide that it's time to take the gloves off? I believe any use of nuclear weapons would
953.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
Reportedly the Moskva's radar system only covers 180 degrees, so the Ukrainians used the drone to distract the radar system, this combined with the high turbulent seas causing artefacts on the radar make it very hard to defend against
954.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
> ...while Ukraine certainly ceases to exist. Also, the only country that nuked another country hasn't ceased to exist, so not sure where your claim comes from. My claim comes from the clear line that was drawn in the sand by NATO.
955.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
> It's possible that Russia swallows their joining NATO, as it did with the two rounds of NATO expansion in the past (former Warsaw pact, then Baltics). It's also possible that Russia sees that as an existential threat, as it d
956.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
The people who do the visual analysis of the losses put a lot of effort into making sure they don’t count duplicates. The tanks despite being the same have some differences between them because they have been upgraded with differently. Russ
957.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
It’s probably best to start with your last point. There’s a reason Russia and the Soviet Union never actually nuked a country, it’s a threat, that’s it. If Russia nukes Ukraine Russia likely ceases to exist. Russia constantly postures about
958.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
What is propaganda about literal images of each individual destroyed / captured Russian tank?. I would probably take 'official' numbers from a lot of sources with a large grain of salt, but these numbers easily serve as good
959.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
If I was asked to jump into a T-34 against modern ATGM's I would revolt more then the tankers already are. A T-34 would be next to unless in Ukraine, and would just be a death sentence, a T-34 probably isn't even worth fielding ag
960.
by _kbh_ 5y ago
Russia is not the Soviet Union, and it's no longer the 1940's. If the Russians lose a significant amount of tanks and troops, the country will face serious issues in Ukraine. Not to mention they are incapable of currently replacin

More ›