_jn

7 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by _jn 9y ago

   How about a https://coinbin.org/lbc,btc,eth -type query? (similar to a few stock market apis I've used)
2. 62.▲
   by _jn 9y ago

   If this really becomes an issue, (and assuming companies manage to coordinate) you could simply require a one-time security deposit around $50–100 to be sent from a bank account. Voilà, no chargebacks.
3. 63.▲
   by _jn 9y ago

   This whole article is based on the presumption that the interiors of driverless taxis won't be recorded... and yet security cameras in Ubers already exist[0] (and aren't dissuaded by the company) [0]: https://uberpeople
4. 64.▲
   by _jn 9y ago

   Sounded [0] more like a suggestion to use it as a list of companies he's involved in, not a company by itself... [0]: https://twitter.com/jondaily83/status/884689301002362880
5. 65.▲
   by _jn 9y ago

   ...my bad. Not sure about HN etiquette—should I delete my comments as off-topic?
6. 66.▲
   by _jn 9y ago

   To expand on that: The only way I can imagine a Sybil attack here is if someone created a massive amount of tiny transactions, and the fees required to get peers to validate them would make that approach infeasible.
7. 67.▲
   by _jn 9y ago

   Seems to be about someone creating massive amounts of privkeys and messing with verification (the fact that 51% attacks no longer exist in this approach make that irrelevant, however.) I'm not an expert on cryptocurrencies, but I don&#