Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_flux
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
32 ms
·
481.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
It's probably not the best idea to base your clone on the name that is being trademarked: https://trademarks.justia.com/984/05/sora-98405663.html
482.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
None of those places have a good idea of your identity, though.
483.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Only two repos of mine were clones there, no idea what is the criteria but if it's about stars, then 15 and 12 seem pretty low threshold. My repos had their open source license available, so I guess we'll need to wait to see actua
484.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Are there examples of cloned repos that don't grant these further rights?
485.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Surely almost all publicly available GitHub repos permit making a clone of them in their license?
486.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Is it completely unwarranted, though? It seems most of the issues listed here are indeed memory safety bugs that are more difficult to pull off in memory-safe languages such as Rust: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-
487.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
What kind of work? I've only given it a short try before moving to Ollama that doesn't have it, but it seemed to have worked there. (With ollama I need to use a retry system.) edit: I researched a bit and apparently it can reduce
488.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
In this case there's nothing that's variable, though, and the competition is able to pull it off precisely. Indeed, they themselves were able to do it before!
489.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
This isn't the answer to that question, but llama.cpp has a feature to constrain output to the provided grammar, such as https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/blob/master/grammars/... Others s
490.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
It would be nice, but how do we get this information required for the conversion?
491.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Loophole can be small, but when exploited properly, an elephant can walk right through it. And you also chose to ignore the part about unintended consequences.. All it really takes to even consider moving into this direction is to propose a
492.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
There are, and we do use them, more and more every day (from my simple consumer point of view), but it's much more difficult to dictate that "everyone" must switch to non-microplastic solutions, like it seems to have been pos
493.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
As I understand it, lead in gasoline was used for motor longetivity, but other approaches have been invented to reduce pollution. So now we use only (or just mostly?) unleaded gasoline, which is used basically the same as leaded. What'
494.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
In which way is the article biased for them?
495.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
> Arm's argument is that the Nuvia license was canceled when it was taken over by Qualcomm. How could the reporter possibly know one way or another, certainly it depends on the contents of that contract? Has anyone outside these thr
496.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
But that's just a type that is huge. I didn't want to wait for the evaluation, but if I drop the f5 out, I got a type that is 1.6 megabytes long when printed without spaces. It's still very fast for "normal size" ty
497.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
The current GPUs aren't really that generally applicable though, as they are most useful when you need to do a bunch of number crunching on a lot of data of the same structure—which is why we still run compilers on CPUs. If you are off
498.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
I think that's all fair that both LMMs and and people get a certain (even unbounded) amount of "pretraining" before actual tasks. But after the training people are much more equipped to do single-shot recognition and cognit
499.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Are you suggesting that if a group of kids were given a book of zoo animals before going to the zoo, they would have difficulties identifing any new animals, because they only have seen one picture of each?
500.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Are you saying it's not fair for LLMs, because of the way they are taught is different? The difference is that we don't know better methods for them, but we do know of better methods for people.
501.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
So do CAs in general offer those? Are they as affordable as "normal" certs? Certainly you need to be paying for that those kind of certificates, possibly some premium? It's probably not worth it anyway, because you're no
502.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Though the times you need to do this, do you want to wait for the extra two seconds? Certainly not! But actually I will enable this feature..
503.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
> I think such a feature needs to be integrated into the browser. It certainly helps/simplifies the problem, but I imagine in most cases a builtin image stitcher inside the screenshot tool could also work in great majority of cases.
504.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
It seems like LLMs would be great for this: "Is this email trying to sell me something?" "Is it from an acquintance?" "I have these mailboxes, which is the most appropriate?" with some additional metadata. Well
505.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
> Gleam's labelled arguments are AFAIK a unique feature OCaml also does this: # let foo ~bar:baz = baz + 42;; val foo : bar:int -> int = <fun> # foo ~bar:12765;; - : int = 12807 What I really enjoyed wa
506.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
I expect it to be similar to letting go off the accelerator—a function that likely pre-existed anyway, to prevent from going out from the service area or enter other disabled areas.
507.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
There were already areas that are out-of-limits for the scooters-by-hour, so I presume it uses a similar mechanism. I'm guessing it would be similar to the letting go of the accelerator, so relatively smooth way to stop it. I agree tha
508.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
If this was purely a CSS injection—as I understand it was—then I don't think it would be possible to redirect on any technical level the user anywhere (e.g. by providing a link). But telling user to do something would still be on the t
509.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Unsafe code can rarely validate pointers it receives and must depend on the properties of the other code to work safely. It just doesn't depend on the safety properties of that other code.
510.
▲
by
_flux
2y ago
Is there going to be something to replace it?
More ›