_betty_

10 ms·

61.
by _betty_ 9y ago
but that's kind of the beauty of css grid, the gracefull fallback is basically mobile view which you already put effort into.
62.
by _betty_ 9y ago
you'd have the same issue between a desktop and mobile user. i don't see it as an issue at all.
63.
by _betty_ 9y ago
what's wrong with giving older browsers a different experience?
64.
by _betty_ 9y ago
Add a hash or version to your CSS/image URLs. Store them all on same CDN.
65.
by _betty_ 9y ago
this used to be common with txt files and IE's terrible practice of sniffing content. It would see a txt file that contained html and display the html instead, it could then pull in a secret silverlight file that was mascarading as a
66.
by _betty_ 9y ago
.NET Core is the rewrite/reimagining of .NET .NET Standard is a standard that the 3 different implementations of .NET try implement (.NET, .NET Core and Mono). Any implementation of .NET Standard can add in extra functionality, hence
67.
by _betty_ 10y ago
I typically find the same about Software Architect vs software architect - eg the Job Title vs the activity that decent developers do.
68.
by _betty_ 10y ago
normally docx viruses are simply VBA scripts but sometimes they exploit an active x embed or image rendering bug. However other times things like browsers do dumb stuff: docx files and silverlight files are both just zip files with complete
69.
by _betty_ 10y ago
While I'd never recommend staying a career that you hate, I'm not sure switching to a position you think is cruisy is a great idea either. That's a recipe for under performance and bad management. It does sound like you'
70.
by _betty_ 10y ago
I thing the idea behind the removing existing regulations rule works better for software than it does for laws. It basically boils down to Leave things tidier than when you arrived. No massive refactor projects, just fix up little things wh
71.
by _betty_ 10y ago
Which in turn is normally defined by what you do at work. Eg I experiment a lot more at home when dealing with dull stuff at work
72.
by _betty_ 10y ago
admittedly there is the occasional moment I hit where I need an extra @ or @: so it's not perfect, but I have much less issue reading that format than the { true && <element /> } syntax, also think @if is a lot nicer
73.
by _betty_ 10y ago
I'd love for them to adopt something similar to Razor (Microsoft server side html engine) note: i've changed your example to show code inside html tags, i'm aware it does something different to yours. conditionals <d
74.
by _betty_ 10y ago
Technically linq isn't an orm, but I guess there's still a lot of overlap with points in the article. Eg you still need to know SQL and the linq abstraction on top of that. What I like about linq/EF is that it doesn't fo
75.
by _betty_ 10y ago
for(var i = 1; i <= 100; i++) { a[fizz +=3] = "fizz" + (a[fizz] || ""); a[buzz +=5] = "buzz"; print(a[i] || i); }
76.
by _betty_ 11y ago
Rewrite small bits of it when you're in the area adding features or fixing bugs. Rewriting code that works and doesn't need new features is pure waste.
77.
by _betty_ 11y ago
Their web/service tier are still windows, doesn't seem that likely that they'd rewrite them in .netcore fast enough to be off windows completely in the near future.
78.
by _betty_ 12y ago
That post was still quite full of equations my brain didn't feel like processing at this time of night. Used some google and found a stackexchange answer that I thought was clearer https://stats.stackexchange.com/questi
79.
by _betty_ 12y ago
Will be interesting to see how Microsoft adopting GitHub and Open Source effects these numbers next year. Although I suspect the cross platform .NET support would make more of an impact.
80.
by _betty_ 12y ago
Of course it'd be hard to insert an item into that array...
81.
by _betty_ 12y ago
Considering how basic this is you wouldn't even really need a standard. jQuery basically already has support for this exact thing, and it's only a few lines of pure JS. $.extend({a:'b', b:2, c: [1,2]}, { a: null, b: 0})