_aavaa_

7 ms·

91.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
I'm not calling it slop because it's long. I'm calling it slop because it's poorly written and reeks of AI with no editing. Instead of > Is the loop just more attempts? One objection deserves an answer up front. A ver
92.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
Or the people writing this could spend more effort to make it not slop. If they can’t be bothered, I won’t waste my time figuring out if this is worth it, there’s are 1000 other articles to read and techniques to try. And if this is worth a
93.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
Well I don’t know what the method is, there’s a mention of ironbee, but I’m not willing to spend the time digging through this to figure out what’s needed and how to set it up.
94.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
Nobody is forcing you to play a game with kernel anti-cheat. I want to play the game, not deal with mass cheating. Unless the people against kernel-level anti cheat can provide an alternative with similar level of protection, there isn’t an
95.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
Seems interesting, but buried under a mountain of written slop.
96.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
> So I would rather share a match with the occasional cheater than run un-auditable ring-0 software on the same machine I use for anything private. Yeah except that’s not the options here. Even with ring-0 there are lots of cheaters. Wit
97.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
One thing that appears to be missing is any mention of non-heterosexual couples, some of which are biologically incapable of having their own children and it's unclear how adoption or surrogacy gets counted in here. And I think it&#x27
98.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
Why would I be missing out on learning? If I want to improve my writing, why does it matter that if it’s Word, ChatGPT, or a teaching telling me that my spelling is wrong? Or that I keep making comma splice errors? Or that I have run on sen
99.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
> You need to hand it in so that the teacher understand where to put in more effort, but if it wasn't for that need, they'd probably have you throw it away after writing it. I am not sure how your literature classes went, but a
100.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
We'll put aside where AI usage is a skill that needs to be taught (which I think there is definitely room for teaching people how to use it effectively as a tool) since that isn't what the discussion is about. The article's t
101.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
Do you think that moderation when it comes to AI in education is not correct?
102.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
Are you seriously trying to compare “AI” in education to fentanyl? The difference between AI robbing you of learning opportunities and acting as a tutor or sounding board is what question you ask.
103.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
Those nefarious distillers, only we are allowed to freely distill the world’s knowledge into our paid products
104.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
I highly doubt the diy machine has proper hdmi CEC support. For a computer that doesn’t matter much, but for the explicit use case of the steam machine (living room gaming) that’s a massive selling point.
105.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
This is a tired argument. When China does it it’s subsidies, when other countries do it it’s called industrial policy.
106.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
But anthropic is. Hosting the model outside the US doesn’t do anything.
107.
by _aavaa_ 3mo ago
That’s great for Kia, but if I owned at VW it doesn’t do me much good. Same problem with banking apps.
108.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
> the company knew her termination would take away “critical employment benefits” – described as “cornerstones of her financial stability” – meaning she “had no choice” but to accept the severance agreement, allowing her to retain many o
109.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
Don’t know about that…
110.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
How do you think the major AI companies trained there model? Pirated books and anything that could be torrented and scraped of the web.
111.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
Even if we grant your argument that brain volume between species isn’t good proxy for intelligence, It doesn’t immediately hold for comparisons within a specie.
112.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
Very overly-long ai slop nonsense. The only fallacy here is that the vast majority of people need a frontier model to do their work.
113.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
The problem isn’t the technology, it’s the economics. The assembly and economies of scale for “mass production” have not been proven in practice; who will you sell the countless expensive ones before it gets cheaper? And the smaller reactor
114.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
Another Monday, same screed.
115.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
The Alberta government absolutely banned new solar and wind development, first a short-lived moratorium and then with regulations meant to "protect the natural beauty", restrictions mind you that absolutely do not apply to the pum
116.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
I'm not forcing anyone to use tools they don't want. The Amish can continue making their handcrafted furniture, but I'll make sure to work on construction sites that have power tools.
117.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
Doesn’t help with the burning part. Or the stranded infrastructure once the demand goes away.
118.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
Title is misleading, they want to start building not “build” (I.e. be operational). Though that only moves the needles from impossible to laughable. > If our goal is to double our grid and build a low-carbon economy in less than 25 yea
119.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
Or like providing the world’s information in machine readable format that the AI companies can convert into model weights without getting permission or compensating the rights holders
120.
by _aavaa_ 4mo ago
Sure, but they’ve either been the kool-aid-drinking p-doomers, or academic discussions about giving them access to weapons. Now we have real companies whose valuation depends on people using their services.

More ›