_aavaa_

4 ms·

31.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
Can't wait for a society dependent on spice and which is still controlled those with political (or super human) powers.
32.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
That’s an argument about sequencing, not of necessity. And as an analogy it breaks down because we need to reduce/eliminate all sources of pollution, not just the current biggest one.
33.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
But not when you look at just one ship, or just one datacenter.
34.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
Let’s not pretend that what is currently in the US is real world capitalism, whatever that means.
35.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
This is an absurd argument. Any one source is a drop in the bucket.
36.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
He runs as PR company in addition to this blog. It goes with the territory.
37.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
> similar to how taxes are added after the fact That is not a positive. I'm fine with splitting up a price if you want to show how much tax gets added, but having to continuously do the mental math of "no this item is 10.99 it&
38.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
And not just the high level language output, or even the assembly. No no, every single piece of microcode produced.
39.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
Warmer would help, but the latitude difference still gets you on sun height and hours of daylight in the winter months.
40.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
> There's no such things with AI tooling. The most similar is when fully vibing software and everyone knows the quality of the result. This is the same “but the ai can’t even do fingers” argument all over again, and it will age just
41.
by _aavaa_ 1mo ago
Ahh, the Manchurian LLM. Everything old is new again.
42.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
I think that’s simple. The submitted title is more absolute than the thing it leads to. The article is talking about content that’s exclusively generated by AI. That’s very different than work that contains , or is derived from, AI out
43.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
Where is the legal language?
44.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
It is just that. Greed. They would do it on macOS too if they could get away with it, but they know they can’t and so don’t make the argument. What? macOS doesn’t require investment into the platform? That alone settles the matter for me wh
45.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
Burning fossil fuels is geo-engineering. The things we need to get serious about are the easy to do thing (compared the sci-fi coded versions of geoengineering) we already know how to do, but are dragging our feet on: electrification, ren
46.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
subsidized versus API pricing sure, but do we have concrete proof of how much it is subsidized versus the breakeven inference costs of those tokens?
47.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
Nobody is talking about forcing people to like it. But people hate AI art on principle, even if it’s as good as people. And those same people don’t care about the AI code in the same games.
48.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
Flash Opencode 0.14/0.28/0.028 Deepseek 0.14/0.28/0.0028 Pro Opencode 1.74/3.48/0.145 Deepseek 0.44/0.87/0.0036 For flash the input/output is the same, but the cache difference is big, you'r
49.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
That’s how double standards work, there often isn’t a clear reason. The art and audio is somehow seen as more important and something only humans should de in a game than the code and design, you know the actual game portion of the game.
50.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
Those are not at the same price. Opecode’s 60 USD of deepseek usage is charged at much higher rates than what deepseek themselves charge at.
51.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
I really doubt that the either of the pro plans are subsidized heavily enough to support you swapping v4Flash for Terra, much less Sol. $5/days is ~330 Mtok/day, that’s a nontrivial amount of work, and none of the gpts are more ef
52.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
I'll believe it when I see it. Their prices are still much higher than deepseek, especially the caching.
53.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
Subsidized by inference profits and volume.
54.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
This is cope. All of the Chinese labs are publishing papers describing their models and each one contains actually novel approaches and solutions. In a few months when they surpass OpenAI and Anthropic, what will be the excuse then?
55.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
If we had deepseek v4 flash 0731 etched on a chip it would be more than capable enough and fast enough for so many people's needs, even hardcore engineer.
56.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
Don’t know but that’s not my point. My point is that even small absolute value changes in cached token prices will have massive impacts on final cost because of the sensitivity on it. If v4 flash cache prices go from 0.0028 to 0.01, the abs
57.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
It’s all about the cache prices. Those dominate usage, cached tokens are easily >90% if not >95% of all used tokens.
58.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
I don’t think the comparison is fair, consider the incentives for the Enhanced Games. Once an athletic declared their taking banned substances, they are barred from every other competition, so it’s no surprise that “clean” athletes dominate
59.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
> "It's easier to get and raise a child > Than to put character in him. No one > Has ever found a way to make a fool > Wise or a bad man good. If god had taught > This to the children of Asclepius— > How to cure
60.
by _aavaa_ 2mo ago
That’s a bad analogy, you still have to put all the effort yourself at the gym while on steroids. Perhaps LLMs are a forklift.

More ›