_aavaa_

19 ms·

451.
by _aavaa_ 11mo ago
The first article you link has the following explaining their stance on immigration [0]: “This approach will ensure that immigration does not depress wages and working conditions or encourage marginal low-wage industries that depend heavily
452.
by _aavaa_ 11mo ago
They have been for decades: https://aflcio.org/about/leadership/statements/reform-h-1b-a...
453.
by _aavaa_ 11mo ago
This argument would make a lot more sense if you replaced remote work with unions. All that power and opportunity and they squandered it thinking their bosses and management was on their side. Go ahead, downvote. As if working in the office
454.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
It is a problem easily solved with advertising.
455.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
I think you summed it up yourself, because cutscenes are trying to turn this medium into that of movies.
456.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Now that might be an interesting angle. 1. Put up CSAM on your unlisted domain briefly. 2. Archive page and delete site. 3. Send people archive link.
457.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Is this a trick question? I know the Tesla software locks as much as possible to prevent third party repairs.
458.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
It’s cause Tesla isn’t a car company, it’s an AI robotics company’s /s
459.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
*skimming off the top from gambling games for children. They don’t even have to put in the effort of making it.
460.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
People do make that argument. The people who think climate change is a haox aren’t persuaded by the purported consequences of a hoax.
461.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Wet without some of her clothes, at a beach. Isn’t that what people do at a beach?
462.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
It is a problem. The engineering tradeoffs have to be done at each level of the stack. And as progressively more layers of the stack make the trade off away from speed the effects compound. Nothing about a cross-platform UI requires that it
463.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
They should account for the difference between the two to control for comorbidities.
464.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Yeah the longer I look at it the less their numbers make sense. I also did a double take, “surely it’s not 4.6 tonnes per year”. But it is. If that came out as a liquid rather than a gas, we’d have stopped burning fossil fuels by now.
465.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Depends on country, some have fixed ratios based on occupancy or square footage of shopping area. Which they could shrink, but it would raise the final price per square foot (land price stays the same and most construction costs don’t get t
466.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Which part? 12 parking lots 657 kW nameplate capacity 1.23 GWh per year of energy production The 185,000 cubicles worth of CO2 emissions is likely based on average pollution per car, and average carbon intensity of the local grid.
467.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Windows mobile by the time it looked like the iPhone was late to the party. But windows had been releasing a mobile os for a long time before that. Microsoft was first, they just didn’t make as good of a product as Apple despite their money
468.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Why is their product not palm? Or windows mobile?
469.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
How many CEO promise full self driving, robo taxis, humanoid robots that are only 6 months away for 10+ years? The equivocation here is quiet something.
470.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
TPMs are not inherently evil. The problem is that they are implemented in a way that gives control over them to the companies rather than the users.
471.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Just because they built it doesn't mean it gets used: https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-why-china-is-still-bu...
472.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
I'm glad it was helpful. > it’s sad to reflect that even if we replaced all heating, it’s still only a couple % of the total rejected heat. It's actually not as bad as it looks. Even if the home heating is not the biggest contr
473.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
> by ZeroHedge Thanks but I’ll pass on what the far-right conspiracy theorists have to say.
474.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
That’s the point.
475.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
It’s not. For example, Saab has had 0 recalls.
476.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Sure. But my accounting was always about the energy that we as humans need to supply. This discussion was originally about how talking about the energy transition in terms of primary energy is inherently misleading. A heat pump does not mag
477.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
> you're confused about the thermodynamics of the situation. I assure you I am not, it is actually you who still seem confused about where the energy is coming from. > they're not giving you more energy than what you put in
478.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
It's likely I am not. Links below, tldrs here: A heat pump does what the name suggests: it pumps heat. Resistive heating and burning gas is converting energy from one form into another. A heat pumps moves energy from A to B (making A c
479.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
Efficiency is not the correct word here. A gas furnace converts 1 J of chemical potential energy (higher heating value for natural gas) into essentially 1 J of internal energy in the air (raising it’s temperature). A heat pump can take 1 J
480.
by _aavaa_ 1y ago
> there’s nothing in that quote that is inherently misleading The discussion of the issue in terms of primary energy is the very thing that's inherently misleading. To move away from fossil fuels we do not have to replace the prim

More ›