Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_aavaa_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
301.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Well if you insert metal rods through it you can help with the heat transfer, then you can lattice over the holes. If you pumpkin pie it, you might even be able to have it hold up under its own weight. Plus a bit of stiff whipped cream in t
302.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Good article, as always hydrogen for transport is dead. Unfortunately, as they say, what is dead can never die. And there will always be companies trying to siphon off public funds to do “trial runs”. One thing that seems wrong is in the ef
303.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
AutoCAD is the easiest example to pick. Fire the draftsmen and hire for AutoCAD.
304.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
We must join with him, we must join with Sauron.
305.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Felony contempt of business model?
306.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
If AI does 90% of the work, you can either do more work with your current staff, or fire a portion and have them do the same amount of work.
307.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
> Maybe because we want lots of different perspectives on building models, lots of independent innovation. That’s only really possible if the front runner don’t buy up all of the chips on the market.
308.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
> CAD was a drop-in replacement for draftsmen -- and even then, draftsmen are still around today, in slightly smaller numbers You’re off my an order of magnitude here. Even ignoring departments that were significantly downsized, you woul
309.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
I don’t think so. It reads much more like “distillation is okay when you do it to your own models.”
310.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Forget the type of electrolyzer, even if they were free hydrogen would still be expensive. The challenges with hydrogen getting cheaper are thermodynamic and can’t be innovated around. The amount of energy required to electrolyze water simp
311.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
> nuclear See you in 15 years I guess. Many site are already building their own capacity, but doing it (unfortunately) with gas turbines.
312.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Sergei and Brin were pretty vocal about the problems with ads and why they don't belong in search engines when they started. The only reason it's expected now is because of a slow boil.
313.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
This has been the past and present for a long at this point. "Sorry there's nothing we can do, the system won't let me." Also see Weapons of Math Destruction [0]. [0]: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/b
314.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Discontinued for most of the time they’re analyzing, and currently on preorder.
315.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Thanks! I’ll keep this on hand for next time I hear that a UFO proof video comes out saying that an object can’t move the way it does on screen.
316.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
This isn’t even a hypothetical. On most phone there’s no toggle to completely block an app’s internet access (only its data usage).
317.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
For more on this exact topic and an answer to Solow’s Paradox, see, the excellent, The Dynamo and the Computer by Paul David [0]. [0]: https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2018/03...
318.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
First of all, thanks for the thorough response, I appreciate it. And that I agree with you about the others you listed; what happened with the war on phonics is like criminal levels of negligence and willful ignorance. (Anyone reading this,
319.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
What is the mountain of evidence against "the entire idea of constructivism"?
320.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
StackOverflow was well on its way to death even without ChatGPT, just look at the graph from [0]. It has been in steady consistent decline since 2014 (minus a very transient blip from covid). Then the chagpt effect is a sudden drop in visit
321.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Decompiling seems like the hard way to go here. Lots of clones pop up for popular games and apps all the time. I don't think you need to go down the decompile route to achieve that.
322.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
If you read their immediate reply you’ll see it invalidates this tired point: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9479
323.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Nothing’s been “disrupted”. Evolution is occurring the same way it’s always done: through random mutations in response to the environment and sexual selection.
324.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Big difference between “derives new result” and “reproduces something likely in its training dataset”.
325.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
At least that misunderstanding didn’t cause a nuclear accident: https://practical.engineering/blog/2025/4/15/when-kitty-litt...
326.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
> If you state “in 6 months AI will not require that much knowledge to be effective” every year and it hasn’t happened yet then every time it has been stated has been false up to this point I think that this has been true, though maybe n
327.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
And it has been getting more true for years in a row.
328.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
So not Twitter, fb, YouTube, TikTok, instagram, gmail, or a website that relies of Google for reach. What do you recommend for getting a message out that which people can see?
329.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
Full LLM, no. Not yet. But there’s new things like sweep [0] that you now can do locally. And 2-3 years ago capable open models weren’t even a thing. Now we’ve made progress on that front. And I believe they’ll keep improving (both on acces
330.
▲
by
_aavaa_
8mo ago
They are not the same level, but that may be fine. As for productivity, I don't take that as a given. Maybe in a few years we'll be at the point where AI is better than AI + human, but we aren't there yet. The other models ma
More ›