Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_a_a_a_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
2y ago
Depends. It can have an effect.
92.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
2y ago
Interesting indeed, a triumph, no. I found the stuff about the cultural revolution by far the most interesting, finally I could understand it - that there was nothing to understand, there was no underlying rationale; it was just madness.
93.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
2y ago
If it makes you feel any better https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2024/03/29/more-bodies-mo...
94.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Create a company, or do you mean buy it 'off the shelf'?
95.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Debating is difficult enough with the ambiguity in natural languages. If you don't even try and be plain what you're trying to say, difficulty will be compounded. If you were agreeing, why not say "I agree" or "I ag
96.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
'spread the blame among civilians' was the wrong phrase. It should have bee impact, not blame.
97.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> You'd already know that if you'd bothered to read what I wrote instead of whinging about it. I'll openly admit that I often don't read things carefully but in this case I don't believe you were making things cl
98.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Try answering: is Israel's response proportionate and acceptable or not? I don't expect any clarity because ISTM you are just trying to fog the issue but happy to be wrong.
99.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
If I've got it wrong, perhaps cos you blather. Get to the point and I'll retract & apologise if it's warranted. Me: > And the reality is...? What? Be specific. You didn't answer.
100.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
And the reality is...? What? Be specific. > what you wrote initially looks like something each of the big groups on this topic can find something disagreeable with So ignore what other people think - make your own point based on facts.
101.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I was pointing out the hypocrisy of telling the world they should look away from what's being done in Palestine because war is dirty, but should sympathise with Israel after Hamas's awful attack, because war is dirty. You don'
102.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I found that putting solid facts in front of Israeli supporters just got me downvotes. Anyway >> It is very convenient to criticize it when you're not in it > Israel 'criticised' Hamas for their monstrous attack six
103.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
3 downvotes in 16 minutes, well I never! (but oddly no other response)
104.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I'm rather unclear about the speed of regrowth. From one source (the web?) It was a matter of years, yet talking to a herpetologist (edit: hepatologist. Blame voice recognition) in a pub, she said it can regrow 80% of itself in a matte
105.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> It is very convenient to criticize it when you're not in it Israel 'criticised' Hamas for their monstrous attack six months ago, started a war over it. Perhaps you're saying Israel should have just accepted it? You
106.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
That was a really, really good answer, thanks.
107.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I've never heard of a conan language, and a couple of URLs to some bad recipes would not go amiss.
108.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Thanks. It's that very subjectivity that makes me doubt we should classify things as art because other people say so. Perhaps that is the core of it. I don't like going into art galleries and being expected to like a picture becau
109.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Touche!
110.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
That's a lot of emotive language, can you actually link to some actual examples.
111.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Can you point to 3 python foot guns, for instance?
112.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Exactly. It's precisely this about art that I find frustrating, not the inability to pin it down but the desire to expand the definition to fit anything someone wants, thus debasing the concept of art. If art is valuable (and I most
113.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> hI am still not sure what the killer app was for the Alpha It was a general purpose processor, talking about a single killer app doesn't make sense. It was designed for speed and expandability and as such seemed very successful.
114.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> The CDC 6600 was really a rather simple machine; ... The CRAY-I was even simpler Pretty bold claim, can you explain why you believe this is so? > But Intel brought it off. Not by buying up and killing the Alpha AXP, oh no.
115.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Methinks you need a mutex here.
116.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Formic acid for the sourness I guess.
117.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
So 12,000,000 nanometre wires (in imperial)
118.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Well said. This type of writing is perfectly doable but it does take effort and a lot of experience.
119.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Not to be a dick (oh, go on then!): > but there wouldn't be anything about the fire's phenotype that would help you come to that conclusion but... but... cloning! But yes, we could do this all day and still get nowhere. We, col
120.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Should it? Doesn't it inherit 'fireness'? I do know what you're saying but it's so easy to argue the other way too
More ›