Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_a_a_a_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
811.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Umm, works for scabies too, also an insect infection https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/ivermectin/ Interesting.
812.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Keyword matching is exactly what recruitment companies do, even the good ones, and I worked directly for one of the best ones in London.
813.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
This is naïve and looks like the guy doesn't have all that much experience "Good candidates now ask many diverse questions about the team setup, role expectations, challenges, the tech stack, career and mentoring opportunities, wo
814.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Thank you for the lesson in memory access times I actually know something about the subject already :-) > But the O(n*log(n)) algorithm I think you're badly missing out the "* log(n)" part. But on reflection, you have made
815.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Well bloody good luck with that mate, I'm desperately looking to switch away from Thunderbird (started using it last year) and while I genuinely hate Microsoft (see many of my past posts), Outlook just plain works . Thunderbird has ju
816.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> Your general point is still right in that an O(n*log(n)) algorithm is not necessarily slower than an O(n) algorithm in practice. Sounds reasonable > for a small N of 10000 Ah, now that is not what I would call a small N
817.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Static typing in programming languages are propositions[1] that the type checker proves (because it is a prover of sorts). It's very simple; it has to be simple to ensure that it's reasonably fast and above all, terminates with a
818.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
sooo.. your thoughts on my position?
819.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> some companies even require it which? If they require a works phone they will give you one. Leave it at home and use it only for work.
820.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
The issues about Backpage are not simple and I don't have time to do more than just skim it as I have some work to do now. I can't form a solid opinion, although it does give the impression that they knew they were doing something
821.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
See my other comment where I point out that I do not own a smart phone. I do own a cell phone; it gets left at home most of the time. Let me put it in simple terms: if you don't want to take part in that aspect of society, then don
822.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> Imagine not owning a smartphone right now I don't, and life goes on as before
823.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Totally inescapable except by taking the damn thing off your face . This 'article' should not be on HN. Is alexanderbz the same Alexander who wrote it I wonder Edit: I guess it is.
824.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Thanks. I'll ask a mod, see what they say. Things can look very different from the other side.
825.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I think that's a bit conspiracy, "an unwritten list". If there was, DanG would preview them first, and there aren't that many so it would be quick and they'd never get on the front page. My guess is it's down t
826.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Okay, I appreciate this because it's constructive, upvoted. From this though, I don't understand why you would conflate consensual and nonconsensual work. It's unquestionable that trafficked women get forced into sex, but tha
827.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> Weird. I haven’t seen that category on the porn sites If you want to watch nonconsensual porn, I suggest you report yourself to the police. If you are unaware of a difference between consensual and nonconsensual porn, please report to
828.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> Sorry. What part of human trafficking is consensual? The article was about porn. Consensual porn. It was you that decided to deliberately taint it by dragging in human trafficking. Because you don't like porn and can't accept
829.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Power/awe/joy/ecstasy. The kind of emotionally loaded words dropped in to make something sound more interesting than it is. It's just crap writing and you're just accepting it. And another one, you can't just &
830.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
All industries have a bad side to them but I guess you honing hard on the sex and drugs industry. Fossil fuels might kill us, but who cares. Funny how consensual actions upset some Americans, but the most sadistic violence is just fine with
831.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I'm with you. Awe and Power from a violin. Idiot writing is taking over.
832.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I can't imagine getting every instruction in a basic block started at every clock. There is almost certainly dependencies within the block. I talked about basic blocks because that would mean that if you want to kick-off more instructi
833.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
A basic block is usually taken to be about 6 instructions. I suppose if you take one or two speculated branches as well then you might easily get to your 10 dispatches possible. Perhaps. As for higher clock speeds, there's a whole lot
834.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
There's a third option. To some people the word shit is just a word when used as a word and no more. To others it can invoke strong and vivid visual imagery, and by that, provoke a strong discomfort and distaste (as it happens I'm
835.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Having an N-wide dispatcher means nothing unless the software can use it, and server clock speeds tend to be lower than desktops. Disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about
836.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
What is 'it'
837.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
>“The case with myself and others... Your're right >>disagree >Disagree. From your link: "The expectation was that if you took paddlefish milk and fertilized a sturgeon egg, nothing would happen. When they crossed the
838.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I can't see any context in the form of a discussion, it's just code, so I can't see the anticipated trade-offs etc. but I'd expect the cost of access to the Btree of any decent size (that is, overflowing cache) and large
839.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Does it make any difference?
840.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> There have been attempts at hybridization between sturgeon and paddlefish in the past ref? > 's not exactly mind-blowing disagree
More ›