Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_a_a_a_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
271.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
@author, Thanks for this, will read, but your webpage is 50% white space; there's almost nothing on the left with all content pushed into the right half. I'm used to this kind of breakage with jscript disabled but (kudos!) you don
272.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
OK. How?
273.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Inheritance should be used for interfaces, not code reuse (unless that comes free with it).
274.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> make inheritance easy but provide no syntactical or semantic support for composition and delegating to inner objects compounds this problem I admit I would really like a 'delegate function call to <object>' construct, b
275.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Cockroaches can be imported by a person ? How on earth does that happen.
276.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> but we're living in the same world with the same general patterns and limitations seems odd. What 'patterns' and 'limitations' do you still see? Because I see so much has changed.
277.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Could you explain "above arithmetic in the hierarchy" in a few words, TIA, never heard of this
278.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Or you could have posted a link to an unrot site instead of possibly spoiling it for others.
279.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Yes, I understand a little about Unicode in this kind of problem, but a code point is an individual logical item even if it is composed of multiple bytes; being a kind of 'string' in itself. I should have asked more carefully, wha
280.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Oh, well done mate! gratz. Maybe he ROT'd it for a reason.
281.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Disable JS. No popup or anything. Full article visible.
282.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
It's information-dense and informative (also over my head). As such it feels absolutely nothing like product placement. I think you're being needlessly cynical.
283.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Why? How does it fail?
284.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I can't see in the article any mention of the metal type used where there is skin contact. Metal for piercings can't be any old thing as people can develop allergies to the metal, usually from the nickel leaching out. Apparently t
285.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
wat?
286.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
You're right, I misunderstood. Thanks.
287.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
By deep-copying it, right? Sometimes it is needed.
288.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
You seem to think that a choice of two things isn't a choice. If/when Firefox disappears and you only have chrome, that is what I would call not having a choice. To repeat: if you can choose between two things then you've g
289.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Sure! Use a library that deep-clones the object first, leaving the original parameter unchanged! And now it's slower than the original library you're criticising.
290.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
thanks for the detail!
291.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
True, a foreign key by itself is just a business requirement. A foreign key constraint is what the database does to enforce that. There's rarely any confusion about the two concepts, though.
292.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
A better post than I expected. The only thing I'd add is that foreign keys can actually improve read times because the optimiser knows it can safely skip certain joins e.g. if you have inner equi-joins between tables a, b and c a
293.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> In a GROUP BY, you may have a few hundred million rows, but only a few hundred groups within them ISWYM although that is rather a specific case. For your purposes though it may be a common case, I don't know. > QuestDB organize
294.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
From article "Imagine that we run this query over a few hundred million rows. This means at least a few hundred million hash table operations. As you might imagine, a slow hash table would make for a slower query. A faster hash table?
295.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
It didn't appear constructive, just implying that they were going to do their best to lose the email. Here in the UK it's quite easy to get stuff fixed. A few years ago, a single complaint to trading standards by me got a can rela
296.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I kind of agree, but given the amount of locking[1] that would entail, the drop-off in performance would have those self-same users squalling about how slow it was . And then they had rewrite everything with a (NOLOCK) without understanding
297.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
If you can't add anything useful, stay out. Although I wonder if it was your house to burn down whether you might feel a little differently about doing the right thing. The answer is, you CC trading standards(Or your country's equ
298.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I don't think this bit is right: > In modern computers with memories that are very slow in comparison with the CPUs and with complex cache hierarchies, the atomic read-modify-write instructions have a very high overhead and using an
299.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
You mean they go flat before you use them? Not, in fact, an innovation...
300.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> Thinking that people you perceive as "privileged" can't comprehend you is a choice too and a form of ignorance. In my experience they can't, and I do have experience in this. In one example, a few years ago I worked
More ›