_2d30

15 ms·

181.
by _2d30 2y ago
I would be interested to hear how expelling Hamas supporters from the United States is at all beneficial to France.
182.
by _2d30 2y ago
Maybe it’s downvoted because it’s an unsupported assumption you made and Americans are uniquely capable of recognizing that?
183.
by _2d30 2y ago
The article is pretty scant on details in terms of how the judgment would be made but using AI to process for an initial review followed by a final human review seems like a slam dunk choice imo
184.
by _2d30 2y ago
Where do they put the camera?
185.
by _2d30 2y ago
> trying to get a 2018 MBP working with Linux and found out ARM basically doesn't work. Since the M series of ARM processors didn’t come out until 2020, that would make a lot of sense.
186.
by _2d30 2y ago
LMAO you literally just removed every word about the incentives around control of OpenAI-P and are claiming it's not a strawman to say that the only thing I say is 97 > 40.
187.
by _2d30 2y ago
> This you? > > They can either have $40B in OpenAI equity or $97B. > In other words: the big number trumps the small number - QED. Yes those are words I used to describe a factual choice they have. Following that are a lot more
188.
by _2d30 2y ago
> They can make the argument that this offer is not in good faith and that Elon would not make an equivalent offer on an open market. Yes this an angle they could take. This would probably be a huge mistake. By doing this they would in p
189.
by _2d30 2y ago
> If OpenAI-NP has a reasonable case to believe that Elon will be a bad steward of the technology and work against their charter ( https://openai.com/charter/ ), they shouldn't sell to him, even if his offer is m
190.
by _2d30 2y ago
For as "obvious to everyone" as your point is supposed to be, it focuses entirely on what the offer means to OpenAI-P and zero on what it means to OpenAI-NP. The decision is to be made by an OpenAI-NP that can effectively divorce
191.
by _2d30 2y ago
> I do think it's reasonable to say that llms aren't an existential risk and spinning them off to a consumer thing while xrisk and super alignment stays in a nonprofit is plausibly mission aligned I think you added this after I
192.
by _2d30 2y ago
> "We believe an OpenAI-P owned by Elon is fundamentally against our mission." But OpenAI-P of course wouldn't be owned by Elon, he would just own $40B worth of OpenAI-P according to their own valuation of it. A tiny minor
193.
by _2d30 2y ago
I'm too smooth brained to see the obvious reason. Would love for someone with more folds to say what the reason is instead of hiding it behind its obviousness. OpenAI-NP can either have a $40B from spinning out OpenAI-P or $97B in cash
194.
by _2d30 2y ago
He would probably also be happy to get OpenAI-NP for $97B! However, I don't think he believes this is likely at all. His goal is to force OpenAI's hand and stop the comical; undervaluing of OpenAI-NP by forcing OpenAI to value Ope
195.
by _2d30 2y ago
That's why I said this: > this is fundamentally about: stopping or fundamentally changing OpenAI's plans to be spun off. If OpenAI actually values OpenAI-NP at $40B then they will surely sell it for $97B. The point is the $40B
196.
by _2d30 2y ago
> and he's simultaneously attempting to seize control of the AI company through an aggressive acquitision Kind of, yes! If OpenAI actually believes that the true value of OpenAI-NP is $40B then surely they will sell it for $97B! But
197.
by _2d30 2y ago
I never said this was altruistic. The same goal can come from him trying to derail OpenAI-P.
198.
by _2d30 2y ago
A lot of people are unsurprisingly throwing shade on Musk being involved here but I think it's really important to understand what this is fundamentally about: stopping or fundamentally changing OpenAI's plans to be spun off. The
199.
by _2d30 2y ago
Pebble went bankrupt because no one bought their products. Their assets were acquired by Fitbit. Fitbit did not continue to produce the Pebble products for which there was very limited demand. Google then later acquired Fitbit.
200.
by _2d30 2y ago
The biggest question on such investment from my POV, is what do the Deepseek results mean about the usefulness/efficiency of this investment? I've been meaning to read a relevant book to today's times called Engines That Move
201.
by _2d30 2y ago
If you want another angle beyond "massaging egos", look into the Trump <> Jeff Yass connection: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Yass
202.
by _2d30 2y ago
And the job of the executive branch is to enforce the laws passed by the legislative.
203.
by _2d30 2y ago
This is completely incorrect. Divestment in this context means the selling of an asset by an organization. You cannot "divest" in this sense from a government. That's nonsensical. The equivalent in Facebook (Meta) terms would
204.
by _2d30 2y ago
Because there is no "TikTok" ban and never has been. There is a "TikTok cannot be controlled by the CCP" law. TikTok is completely legal under the law as long as they divest it. However, in a great act of self-incriminat
205.
by _2d30 2y ago
Thanks for providing a definition of a commonly understood legal term that I used. Here’s a screenshot of the accusations of bribery contained in the Hindenburg report: https://imgur.com/a/cta3zuj If you take even a cu
206.
by _2d30 2y ago
Adani Group which was charged in November by the SEC for bribery? https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/adani-group-shares-p...
207.
by _2d30 2y ago
Can you say more about the Supermicro “hit job”? Last thing I saw was E&Y resigning as their auditor which certainly suggests some potential accounting issues.
208.
by _2d30 2y ago
Did they also teach you to give snappy little titles to little different sections of writing? I find it a very odd but specific style of writing that has only recently risen in prominence.
209.
by _2d30 2y ago
You write a lot like LLMs do. Would be interested to know where you developed your style.
210.
by _2d30 2y ago
> Well except for the fact that some specific people made a whole lot of money while letting it fall apart, and have paid for decades of media relations trying to convince everyone otherwise. Who are some of these people?

More ›