Zuiii

30 ms·

361.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Why doesn't google do the same then? They have the same issue and have a much larger market share. They don't do it because it doesn't stop those plenty of people from doing what they want to do. This misguided decision from
362.
by Zuiii 4y ago
> (folks whining about how their incredibly-niche use-case isn't supported anymore which breaks their workflow etc.) If these complaints come up every release, then perhaps they aren't "incredibly-niche" after all. At
363.
by Zuiii 4y ago
> Why should it be legal? Good but irrelevant question. My point still stands: one is legalized, the other is not.
364.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Any chance (at all) this gets merged back into upstream? This is incredibly useful and is a major improvement over elinks and friends. I really don't want to see this to fall behind upstream in terms of performance and security fixes.
365.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Something that is legal and regulated.
366.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Then society shouldn't tolerate knifes either. Banning an entire class of activity because someone somewhere might abuse it is a ridiculous irrational way to reason about things. The question is simple: Will the thing mostly be used fo
367.
by Zuiii 4y ago
> Firefox requires at least uploading to Mozilla ... which requires I sign a legal document and involve a thirdparty gatekeeper. Chrome is practically the same; I'm not going to ask my users to go mess with their browsers' set
368.
by Zuiii 4y ago
This is ridiculous. I hope the EU steps in and deals with microsoft's monopoly on default secure boot keys.
369.
by Zuiii 4y ago
> that’s one hell of a user benefit Not for every user. Besides, the protections this would offer would be easily and cheaply circumvented via a raspberry pi and usb peripheral emulation. The is no escaping the analog hole as you stated.
370.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Unless I can write and distribute extensions without signing a legal agreement or having to involve a thirdparty gatekeeper, I'd rather not.
371.
by Zuiii 4y ago
The custom header requirement will make this version of sqlite unusable for many usecases. Can SQLite fallback to using slower persistant APIs if neither Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy or Origin-Embedder-Policy are set? If not, does the SQLite
372.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Of course negligence causes the system to fail. That's why people rely on REPUTABLE developers; that is, those who have a long history of doing good, thorough reviews. In practice, even single-reviewer systems have proven to be enough
373.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Are you honestly telling me that a package that was reviewed and signed off by three reputable developers is practically susceptible to "Scientific fraud"? If you do, then I can see why you think this problem is unsolvable. You wi
374.
by Zuiii 4y ago
I know I shouldn't say this but I'm grateful this happened. People treat this problem as unsolvable when it's absolutely not. Solutions like crev have existed for a long time but languages like rust and python devs never trea
375.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Fair point. I dearly miss Rust's type system. I think python vs rust is always going to be a tradeoff either way. I just wish we had the best of both worlds in one language. Rust's base language with python's extensive librar
376.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Then they can send their devices to apple.
377.
by Zuiii 4y ago
The idea of having multiple layers is to make foul play more difficult to cover up; i.e the chances of someone screwing up grows exponentially with every person you add.
378.
by Zuiii 4y ago
For all its warts and the trouble and waste it causes, I'm still very grateful that crypto exists and I hope that it continues to exist until a real solution to digital cash (where bullshit like this can't happen) pops up. Until t
379.
by Zuiii 4y ago
As a person who has written Rust code professionally for 4, here's why I returned to python: batteries included. That's it. Having cargo download 1000s of package from who knows who for basic functionality is unacceptable. Rust&#x
380.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Then have a panel from canada's regulatory body review every case and fine those who misclassify their cancellation, then have an independent audit of those panels to avoid regulatory capture.
381.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Not without that piece of paper they can't. What GP likely refers to is aken to a EUFI key that is printed on a piece of paper that you store in a safe place. Without this key, thieves or anyone else can't reset the phone.
382.
by Zuiii 4y ago
one card == one transaction
383.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Seeing that the US managed to extradite a British citizen from his own country for hosting links, I would definitely say so. The right way is to do this is to host this on tor or similar and only advertise it on the internet behind a good v
384.
by Zuiii 4y ago
I've always been able to access it via tor which is operating normally. Just be sure to confirm a disposable email address with them or they'll never let you in. Registering an account by itself is no longer enough when using to
385.
by Zuiii 4y ago
I call this the gnome affect.
386.
by Zuiii 4y ago
> people [..] forget the larger picture that it's about trusting the host not to pwn you It's not about that. It's about pushing back the trust boundary to be as close to the source as possible. Of course your upstream can
387.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Is there a similar feature but for taking full page screenshots as well? Using add-ons that do this is unfortunately not allowed on firefox for android.
388.
by Zuiii 4y ago
I've encountered this exact issue: It kept bugging me to close firefox so that I can update. I closed it. Then I relaunched it and the message popped up again. I repeated this process for a couple of days until I gave up, uninstalled s
389.
by Zuiii 4y ago
Why did Chrome stop supporting it? Seeing that they support more obscure keychain apps like whatever ships with KDE and Gnome, I suspect that it was not due to a lack in resources.
390.
by Zuiii 4y ago
I just tried installing an add-on on my android and the "Add to Firefox" button is still grayed out. Searching for "compatible" extensions yields only 15 results. So no, Firefox still doesn't support extensions on a

More ›