Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ZitchDog
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
211.
▲
Burn After Reading: The Next Self-Destructing Message Service
(carlfranzen.net)
1 points
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
|
0 comments
212.
▲
Fixing Checked Exceptions in Java 8
(java8blog.com)
1 points
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
|
0 comments
213.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
I guess I should have specified, I was thinking of the benchmarks vs non-invokedynamic JRuby. No intention of starting a benchmark war. Ruby 1.9 is fast too.
214.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
> InvokeDynamic support This is the big one, in my opinion. See here[1] for some benchmarks of JRuby + invokedynamic. We're talking orders of magnitude for some benchmarks. [1] http://blog.headius.com/2011/08/invokedynamic-in-jruby-co
215.
▲
Flow: Function definitions derived from graph declarations
(github.com)
2 points
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
|
0 comments
216.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
Reflection only works with the iPhone 4S, before you get too excited here.
217.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
(maven only solves one of those problems)
218.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
"We would like to be able to Grok all open-source code in the world. For any given Java library in the world, find all callers of this function!" Whether it will work or not, this is a truly audacious and remarkable vision.
219.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
Just spitballing here, but maybe they could embed a side-camera in the device and display a real-time image to cover up your blind spot.
220.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
It seems to max out at 5000 followers (which makes some sense because the default behavior of the twitter API is to return the first 5000 ids) This may seem nit-picky, but the main cool-factor of this is to see which high-profile people fol
221.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
Sure, we could guess at all sorts of things from within a function. We could guess that the function is running from a terminal, and simply print the result of the function to stout. Hell, we could guess what the caller is going to do w
222.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
Note that I was not arguing for checked exceptions. Right, I understand that. And I was merely pointing out a flaw in your argument against my argument. You may be able to recover from a missing file, no one can help you if this pointer
223.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
Usually those architecture astronauts have a BaseException class... just make it extend RuntimeException and you're done!
224.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
All exceptions (checked or otherwise) disclaim and defer the error in a type safe way (unchecked exceptions can be declared in the throws clause too!) The difference is that we can require them to be dealt with by the caller, which is gener
225.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
Checked exceptions require that the calling function acknowledge that an error has occurred But why do they require the client to acknowledge the error? Better stated, why would one use a checked exception versus an unchecked? The general
226.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
I have thought quite a bit about checked vs unchecked exceptions and come to the realization that there is a fundamental philosophical problem that checked exceptions can never overcome. The idea with checked exceptions are that they should
227.
▲
by
ZitchDog
14y ago
Ahhh doclets. I certainly don't miss those things!
228.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
Update: This is apparently a known issue that Parse is actively working on fixing.
229.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
Note sent. Thanks! Also, all crankiness aside, aside from this issue Parse has been very nice to work with. I'm impressed at how easy it is to get a new project up and running.
230.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
I've been using parse for the last 3 weeks. One thing I've discovered is that it works very well for situations like a chat room, where the app is expected to always be online. For apps which need offline mode, like mine does, things start
231.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
It really should be Assert.that(6, Is.greaterThan(7)), shouldn't it? Best of both worlds!
232.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
And screen scraping!
233.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
Generally this would not be done in production code. jMockit is pretty out there, syntax - wise, and the anonymous inner classes are generally discouraged in production code. In tests are generally fine though. which is why jMockit can get
234.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
I see that now, thanks. I did a quick scan of the doc and didn't see it as it's a little buried.
235.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
I don't see any callbacks here, which is nice, but doesn't really fit the Node execution model. Do the commands block? Are they queued and executed asynchronously?
236.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
Retina iPad: confirmed. Also, I really doubt they are showing that iPad in landscape mode, which means that most likely the home button is gone. Not sure how I feel about that one.
237.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
This is what you're looking for: http://quintanasoft.com/dumbster/
238.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
You do know about LuaRocks, right? It's not as robust or vibrant as the Ruby or Python equivalent, but it certainly does exist. http://luarocks.org/repositories/rocks/
239.
▲
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
This looks incredibly useful in light of the current moves to censor Twitter in other countries. My first thought is, shouldn't we write this for iOS as well? Unfortunately I doubt this app would be possible to create for iOS. There is no w
240.
▲
SplinterNet: An Unblockable Social Network for Android
(github.com)
3 points
by
ZitchDog
15y ago
|
1 comments
More ›