Zickzack

6 ms·

31.
by Zickzack 6y ago
The text says: "They also added some imaginative embellishments". For me, these embellishments spell 'we hope for more tourists than the other sites'. For the other sites, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org&#x
32.
by Zickzack 6y ago
The first line misses a delta as well: δἐδυκε μὲν ἀ σελάννα The poem is beautiful and the translations do its sophisticated simplicity no justice. Thanks to the OP, by the way, for the astronomical article. I have tried to date the poem as
33.
by Zickzack 6y ago
Fascinating read, including the part that Jeffrey Epstein was linked to intelligence from the very beginning. However, the article (and others, too) does not mention drugs, not even alcohol or cigarettes. They are conspicuous by their absen
34.
by Zickzack 6y ago
Scheme is properly tail recursive. That means that CPS conversion is going to work. Seen that way, call/cc is just a convenience feature that spares you the work of the conversion. Introducing weaker language constructs and claiming t
35.
by Zickzack 6y ago
The generation of my grandfather taught me to cut off the "Klöten" (testicles) right after his death in order to prevent boar taint.
36.
by Zickzack 6y ago
The claim is that "the English possessive is potentially recursive, while the Saxon genitive [its counterpart in German] is not". I think they are confusing some issues. And by the way, I thought Saxon genitive was a term from Eng
37.
by Zickzack 6y ago
Jürgen Udolph - the researcher in Onomastics who has proposed the generally accepted theory - is well respected. The names of families and of places in that region northeast of Berlin resemble those from Hameln/Hamelin. However, he doe