Zetice

14 ms·

151.
by Zetice 3y ago
In the context of LLMs, it’s common to say “understood” as an anthropomorphic shortcut to describe the weights on their neural networks. You don’t get this, I understand, but the phrase is perfectly acceptable here. And I absolutely do not
152.
by Zetice 3y ago
If what you say is true then an LLM will do just fine, exactly how it does with literally every other piece of software that has hey do work well with. Like I said, this reveals a wildly wrong and terrible understanding of how LLMs work. Y
153.
by Zetice 3y ago
By definition "all the other software" can't have bad UX, as a large part of UX is predictability. And no, talking about your software "wrong" won't matter meaningfully. Also people would have to talk about yo
154.
by Zetice 3y ago
Not a fan of the title on the site, picked this from Techmeme.
155.
Elon Musk claims “block is going to be deleted as a ‘feature’, except for DMs”(theverge.com)
12 points by Zetice 3y ago|1 comments
156.
by Zetice 3y ago
...it's 100% Facebook's problem. I sometimes forget there is no barrier to entry on this website, thank you for reminding me.
157.
by Zetice 3y ago
A) if your software is "unique" such that an LLM can't figure it out, it is a terrible UX, and B) the LLM will have learned about responding to your customers specifically; it will know when to pull from elsewhere and when
158.
by Zetice 3y ago
Genuinely and wildly stupid logic betraying a fundamental misunderstanding of how LLMs function.
159.
by Zetice 3y ago
That's because it's a poorly written article by someone who doesn't know the difference. It interchangeably talks about issues only with the UX and the actual technical backend pieces involved.
160.
by Zetice 3y ago
A hacker would start salivating if they heard someone who built a product storing PII said what you just did about session tokens for your personal projects.
161.
by Zetice 3y ago
Happens all the time , where access is through a low privilege user, or the nature of the infiltration isn't just a user but through some specific tool that only itself has access to specific things. Maybe the hack gets you into Splu
162.
by Zetice 3y ago
Permissions; if logs aren’t properly locked down that doesn’t mean everything is available.
163.
by Zetice 3y ago
Hacker gets in, exfiltrates your log files that mistakenly have session tokens in them, goes through over the course of an hour or two before stumbling upon an admin session token that's still valid apparently. Could easily write a scr
164.
by Zetice 3y ago
> If an attacker steals a session cookie with XSS or session fixation, the attacker immediately gains access to a valid session and can keep performing requests to keep the session alive. Objectively false? If they get the refresh token
165.
by Zetice 3y ago
"Session" here is the word used for the duration in which an access token is valid. You may be talking about UX, but the submission is talking about access tokens.
166.
by Zetice 3y ago
This is an insane take; if your session token is buried somewhere in a log and gets discovered after a few hours, it shouldn't even be remotely possible that it's still valid.
167.
by Zetice 3y ago
Sure, but less so on the core value prop for that company.
168.
by Zetice 3y ago
Removing one’s seatbelt and leaving one’s aisle are completely different behaviors.
169.
by Zetice 3y ago
Why is "people won't listen" a real argument here? They'll do what they're told or they'll get banned from flying on that airline, and possibly pay up to $25k, as it's a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 46504 to
170.
by Zetice 3y ago
One would presume it's harder than that, given it's the product of a team/company specializing in detecting exactly such a thing, right?
171.
by Zetice 3y ago
We do this with some "slide this puzzle piece into place" CAPCHAs; my understanding is the detection is based on how slowly you fit the piece in. A computer would be linear in its movement, whereas a human with a mouse would op
172.
by Zetice 3y ago
Could you try to explain it again, without the editorializing? Just a straight, facts only version of events, please. Don’t worry, we’ll be upset, we love getting upset, but we have to feel like we figured it out. Americans just prefer to
173.
by Zetice 3y ago
When you need a many hundreds of dollars device to account for a slight difference in writing feel, you’re failing to adapt to the advance of technology. If your preferences can’t evolve with the times, you’re succumbing to the calcificatio
174.
by Zetice 3y ago
It's not really personal data if you consent to providing it, is it?
175.
by Zetice 3y ago
If you're the CCCP, I think you do both, especially if Americans will just install the malware for you, doubly especially if they'll actively fight their own government when it tries to warn them about the risks.
176.
by Zetice 3y ago
Okay argument aside, I appreciate the donation. I do kind of find the EFF to be insufferable in their outreach (hyperbolic), but that's a really nice thing to do. Thanks. Fundamentally, I think we disagree on whether or not privacy i
177.
by Zetice 3y ago
Modern privacy violations have nothing even remotely resembling the negative impact the holocaust had on Jewish people…
178.
by Zetice 3y ago
Nope, that’s your phrasing, not mine. I didn’t call anything here “niche”. I also didn’t bring up the holocaust, that was also you.
179.
by Zetice 3y ago
So it’s got nothing at all to do with the topic then, ok.
180.
by Zetice 3y ago
Ok either this is a niche issue or its the next holocaust. It can’t be both. Your complete inability to be consistent in your argument kind of does my work for me. Look at the contortions you have to make to argue against the simple idea t

More ›