Zetice

62 ms·

841.
by Zetice 4y ago
Heh nope, I still get the whole "Sure, here's an example of a CSV file with 10 rows of sample Chipotle restaurant order data:" I wonder if the web UI has some additional "explain everything you do" prompt injection
842.
by Zetice 4y ago
Nope, I genuinely wanted to know if that's what they thought, and frankly am not interested in your socialization tips, especially considering the only thing you've contributed here is antagonistic browbeating of a stranger.
843.
by Zetice 4y ago
Ok, dumb question, but does the API skip over the whole, "Thanks for asking that question, here's what I found:" stuff I keep seeing in ChatGPT when I ask it to generate non-text responses? Even when I ask it the "genera
844.
by Zetice 4y ago
You've got to know where the line is to teach people not to cross it!
845.
by Zetice 4y ago
Right, but proximate cause vs. ultimate cause is in play here. Without kids, would these problems exist? Maybe, but I’m arguing we should discuss the possibility that choosing to have kids are the ultimate cause of OPs issues.
846.
by Zetice 4y ago
I didn’t, I was asking a question.
847.
by Zetice 4y ago
Carlos Cipolla had a similar idea when he wrote “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity”, the chart commonly found in search results mirrors this one almost perfectly.
848.
by Zetice 4y ago
What is an acceptable bar, then? I'm open to the flexibility, I'm just not hearing any from other folks here, all of whom seem to think any two people at any time can decide to have as many children as they desire, with zero re
849.
by Zetice 4y ago
So you think literally anyone, at any time, should be supported by their society to have any number of kids, regardless of their financial or social situation? I really don't understand what the value of this blank check for having chi
850.
by Zetice 4y ago
These aren't sentences, care to try again?
851.
by Zetice 4y ago
I just need to understand where personal responsibility fits into this conversation, and I don't really accept "nowhere".
852.
by Zetice 4y ago
Right, I don't know it to be the case, but I think we ought to consider the idea that "have kids" is not the answer for everyone.
853.
by Zetice 4y ago
The point I'm trying to make here is that it's very possible the answer to the question of, "Why is my life so difficult?" to be, "Ten years ago you made a really bad choice for you and there's no real way arou
854.
by Zetice 4y ago
Er, no it doesn't. How much about each of Goldman's investments do you think David M. Solomon knows in depth? They make thousands of deals each year, it would be insane and unsustainable for him to have deep knowledge about each
855.
by Zetice 4y ago
You can absolutely delegate understanding. If you don't, you are screwed as a leader. In fact, one of the things you have to give up as a leader is being the smartest person in the room. I'll even go so far as to say if you
856.
by Zetice 4y ago
You can absolutely know and understand all of those things without understanding the product, mostly by asking the people who do understand the product. Otherwise you're arguing against the concept of delegation, and there are severa
857.
by Zetice 4y ago
A more useful way of thinking of "natural rights" is that "The set of rights that, if everyone were to have, would maximally smoothen interaction between individuals and groups." I don't think there's a real ar
858.
by Zetice 4y ago
You called it a trap. I said it wasn't a trap, but indeed a valid way to evaluate companies. Knowing the product isn't as important as it seems to be, when you have evidence to demonstrate a number of other key factors such as
859.
by Zetice 4y ago
Then we'd both be wrong.
860.
by Zetice 4y ago
I’m not sure it’s a trap so much as arguably irrelevant, if all of the other elements exist.
861.
by Zetice 4y ago
Why comment on HN? Why do anything for a challenge and for fun?
862.
by Zetice 4y ago
Por que no los dos? Exercise is not a long activity, plenty of time for both.
863.
by Zetice 4y ago
What part of what you just wrote couldn’t we do before, with human labor and/or existing tools?
864.
by Zetice 4y ago
I don't think your second list item here is true, or uniquely true of GPT/LLMs anyway, so I'm not sure we're any further along than we were in 2019 for this specific problem.
865.
by Zetice 4y ago
Agile frameworks often remove the developer as much as possible from the time estimation effort, instead relying on past performance, and attempting instead to have the developer focus on breaking work up evenly.
866.
by Zetice 4y ago
Yeah I don’t read this story as an example of how a vet is obsolete, but how a vet can be more effective with assists from LLMs. Enhance not replace! The map is not the territory, so you’ll always want to pair a native with the expert (and
867.
by Zetice 4y ago
Yes but being deaf would also be relevant; there are lots of other things that could alter your listening experience. What I said is applied to people in generally good health and free from any kind of impairment. It’s not generally conside
868.
by Zetice 4y ago
No it doesn’t? Inference is what you make it; you can think a podcast person is agreeing with you when they really aren’t. Autism doesn’t really play into this; no human gets intuition correct, due to bias.
869.
by Zetice 4y ago
Monologues aren’t a realistic alternative, no podcast I know of is just one person speaking constantly. That sounds more like political radio shows, and those are also terrible.
870.
by Zetice 4y ago
What? Autism? I’m not sure what that has to do with anything.

More ›