Zetaphor

9 ms·

181.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
It is trivially easy to filter this with an LLM or even just a basic CLIP model. Will it be 100% foolproof? Not likely. Is it better than doing absolutely nothing and then blaming the users? Obviously. We've had this feature in the ima
182.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
Windows users: Linux is too complicated, you have to configure too much stuff and eww command line Also Windows users: I downloaded this massive collection of registry tweaks and PowerShell scripts that I have to run as admin after every up
183.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
You've got nothing to lose by trying but time. Time spent learning something new is certainly better than time spent trying to regain control of your OS and workflow after another mandatory "improvement".
184.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
Linux ages like WINE, Windows ages like milk. The incentives for improving Linux are driven only in part by commercial interests, and those interests are not completely centralized. Windows' fate is entirely in the hands of the current
185.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
These studios have profit margins in the multi-millions, they could afford a symbolic $100k donation. Instead they choose to push their developers through another crunch cycle.
186.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
What exactly do you propose?
187.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
Clutch pearls
188.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
One interesting difference is influencer is plausible for a significantly larger population of youth than their legacy equivalents ever were
189.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
Why do these have to be mutually exclusive?
190.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
I don't see how filtering the training data to exclude specific topics the CCP doesn't like would affect the capabilities of the model. The reason Chinese models are so competitive is because they're innovating on the archite
191.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
Also the influence they have on the tech industry, consoles already dominate the market share
192.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
This is addressed (imperfectly) by Flatpak
193.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
> Yes, appears. To know for sure you’d have to read more of it. You’d have to spend time to understand it. If you know the author and know they have been writing code before LLMs and they tell you they have written it all themselves or a
194.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
I appreciate you taking the time to make this exist. Ignore the folks who just want to complain instead of bringing their own solution into existence.
195.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
You could always just not use it. Or better yet go write a replacement yourself by hand and make a direct comparison.
196.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
If _you_ can read the code, and it's of reasonable quality (I can and this code appears to be), then what exactly is the point of this argument? Before the authors work, however you choose to define that word, this did not exist. Now i
197.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
Neither is the bias and censorship exhibited in models from Western labs. The point is that this evaluation is pointless. If it's mission critical for you to have that specific fact available to the model then there are multiple ways t
198.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
They're running on custom ASICs as far as I understand, it may not be possible to run them effectively at lower clock speeds. That and/or the market for it doesn't exist in the volume required to be profitable. OpenAI has bee
199.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
There can be quality differences across vendors for the same model due to things like quantization or configuration differences in their backend. By running locally you ensure you have consistency in addition to availability and privacy
200.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
You're in the wrong thread friend
201.
by Zetaphor 10mo ago
The repo history shows about two weeks of development. If you can't be bothered to do basic due diligence before critiquing, your opinion is just as 'vibe-based' as you claim the code is.
202.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
I think an important differentiator is that of all the companies you just listed, Valve is the only private company. That seems to explain a lot of this.
203.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
Let them have their rootkits, good riddens
204.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
The new title says nothing, where the one that lead me to click the notification I received actually had information that lead to me clicking
205.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
> If Windows at home ran like Windows does on corporate PCs, people would like it better. How much of that experience is a result of your corporate IT removing all the bullshit with group policies that Microsoft has introduced
206.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
Same here, maybe we're too deep in our own domains
207.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
And yet most of the people I know, including many technical ones, default to ChatGPT before Google's AI Studio. Google has general brand awareness, but ChatGPT has become the Bandaid or Kleenex of AI
208.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
It's unclear to me how a software update is supposed to help this component with radiation shielding
209.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
If you're looking for an alternative to all of this, the BangleJS v2 is both cheaper and more hackable than the Pebble watches. It doesn't tick all of the same boxes, but it's performed well for me over the last 6 months. Her
210.
by Zetaphor 11mo ago
Former Rebble dev here, I've been very happy with the BangleJS. It doesn't meet all of your criteria but the battery lasts me a week and it's more hackable than Pebble ever was.

More ›