ZeroSolstice

11 ms·

61.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Yeah I wouldn't say it failed its just that there wasn't a financial motive to move towards IPv6. As more networked devices and the device data itself becomes important moving to IPv6 will follow. Residential ISP's and some c
62.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
I think that if you are in a position where you are hosting your own infrastructure in a data center these wouldn't be difficult issues to address and are the bare minimum in running that type of operation. You can front any website wi
63.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
I'm sure there are a few different store layout concepts over time. However you don't need a membership at Costco to eat at the food court or use the pharmacy, purchase alcohol in some states so if we applied the "Ikea"
64.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
I wasn't asking about a reddit thread, I was asking about your experience since you indicated it happened to you. If you don't want to share thats fine I was just curious as quite a few commenters on the thread seem to think that
65.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Fair enough. A constantly tuned feedback-loop is certainly worth the effort. All the best.
66.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
> It really isn't that big of a deal... I just won't go back. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Why bother spending the time making a comment and subsequently replying to other comments. These actions seem to conflict with what you are saying.
67.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
I'm not sure what you are hinting at by saying "like a potential criminal who may be using someone else's card." Were you using someone else's card or not? Its a membership based store and your card is what validate
68.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Its a wholesale club. Replacing an item at full price would be the complete opposite purpose of the store and membership. Its not about the available supply of a product, its about Costco using its purchasing power to buy the product at a c
69.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Its a wholesale club. The items aren't in permanent locations because they are making purchases in bulk when the price is advantageous to do so. This means they won't always have the same items all the time. The items you mention
70.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Yes this is by design. The company is being reimbursed through insurance or given a tax write-off[1] for documented stolen items. As long as they are showing that they put reasonable efforts in to deter theft. This could be a loss preventio
71.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
I would venture the reasoning for this is that the system that handles inventory was never designed with external customers in mind. Most inventory tracking is done at the register/PoS when the purchase is made. The inventory is autom
72.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
My rough assumption is that this is by design. If you can't find the local talent you can justify H-1B[1] and L-1B[2][4] visas. For the L-1B I would imagine the TSMC North America[3] would suffice for the criteria of "enables a U.
73.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Thats a good point. Looks like RedHat considered this and offer free company/professional developer RHEL images for non-production use[1]. In 2021 they allowed zero-cost licensing for individuals[2]. [1] https://developers.r
74.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
You are most certainly correct and I suppose without the actual numbers its a bit of speculation. My main point was that there is no additional cost, even if you exceed the shrink budget. The losses are all written off because with a loss p
75.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
I'm not totally surprised as most employee's don't know how they fit into their current organization as a whole or how their organization fits into their current market, never mind other companies and vendors. Its along the
76.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Right, but I think the OP's question is why are you using RHEL compat instead of just getting licensed RHEL. In your example a company is already fine with paying full price for major engineering applications why wouldn't you do t
77.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
How exactly is the dependability and stability determined? By back-porting you are already changing the original version of software. What then becomes the difference at that point verse tracking the actual project version? Assuming both go
78.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
So if stability is a strict requirement why are you dependent on an OS that you have no contractual obligation with? I mean if the community OS model was working for the CentOS team why go under the RedHat umbrella? My guess is going to be
79.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Why would you be dependent upon CentOS(RHEL compat) if you are in those industries? If you need certification and LTS then pay for it by purchasing RHEL licenses. It seems very silly for people to be getting upset now that a free OS hasn&#x
80.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
You are correct on this observation. The answer is most people/organizations don't actually know if they need to be RHEL compatible. Outside of any places that have a compliance requirements, where saying you are RHEL compatible b
81.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
1. Yeah the jails item was addressed above with Debian being able to run docker so don't go with FreeBSD for that. Again, you don't have to run the same OS for everything. Its not like homogenous environments haven't existed
82.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
You could be right but thats a big gap between "could likely do well selling..." and actually having a market and reliable customers. What if thats not their business model? What if it requires hiring or finding a dedicated ARM de
83.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
> About a year or two after install, reboots and power-offs stopped working. The system just hangs instead after printing out a message about USB, and I cannot figure out for the life of me what's wrong. My initial read here would b
84.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
From reading your response I think there are more questions than answers. I'll quickly go through the first ones and get to the main items. 1. Docker does run on Debian[1][2] which is why I referenced "Freebsd or Debian." For
85.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
As I'm reading the comments I'm a bit curious what services people are running, or dependent on CentOS for, that FreeBSD or Debian can not provide? In the past I could see buying into an eco-system of tooling that helped you manag
86.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Yeah I was having the same thought on the web form and if it brings additional overhead maintenance, testing, etc which to me would be the same as trying to get some form of PGP working across mail clients. > Having said that, if the pro
87.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
They wouldn't have to have access or SSH keys. The position is usually at a level where people don't question requests or have a heightened guard with emails. It wouldn't be difficult to pivot to requesting an account made f
88.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Is there a bit more you can expand on this? A contact form only serves one-way communication and if its sending an email anyway what is the workflow improvement or additional confidentiality/integrity with regards to the message? The w
89.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
Based on the limited public PGP key infrastructure, OpenSSL would seem to be the better solution for this. You already have the companies public key from the site certificate and it provides the same confidentiality and integrity since only
90.
by ZeroSolstice 3y ago
As a person making the recommendation why would you place bounds on it? There could be an unlimited number of conditions in which the suggestion could work as intended verse trying to consider all possible interpretations of your recommenda

More ›