ZenPro

21 ms·

61.
by ZenPro 12y ago
You are done with this conversation because you are wrong and you know it. I am not putting words in your mouth. You said " nutrients from fresh animal meat " in the same post where you expressed disdain for fast food. Yet you cl
62.
by ZenPro 12y ago
This ^^ We have clashed on other threads PC but this comment is outstanding.
63.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Please name some countries with excellent human rights and freedom of information track records. The OP compared one member of the UN Security Council with another. There are five permanent members. Are any of the UNSC on your list?
64.
by ZenPro 12y ago
All that chart shows me is the following - If you remove X cause of deaths in human beings then it will result in a rise of Y cause of death in human beings. As stated earlier; humans beings must die . If not from infection or injury then
65.
by ZenPro 12y ago
It's completely relevant. You are discriminating against fast food without any attempt to apply your arbitrary reasoning to other foodstuffs you consider " wholesome " or " good ".
66.
by ZenPro 12y ago
How many old and frail people do you think were cutting around prior to the 18th Century? I would wager not many. Humans have to die from something at some point. If you have compelling evidence that fast food reduces your life feel free
67.
by ZenPro 12y ago
You do have time to correct my thinking because you attempted to correct it. Mark your words? You talk about being in the nutritional dark ages then mention eating fresh animal meat No evidence exists anywhere that human beings should con
68.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Spoken truly like someone who has no idea what they are talking about. At present industrial countries spend between 9-11% of their annual income on foodstuffs and less than 5% of their time gathering said foodstuffs - the lowest in time&#x
69.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Downvoted for being right again. Oh HN - you are nothing if not predictably petty. :-)
70.
by ZenPro 12y ago
In your mind how would that source verify JCB's are not there? They would have to ground-penetrate the entire City of London and Greater London conurbation.
71.
by ZenPro 12y ago
You are asking someone to prove a negative? That is ludicrous. Imagine your statement applied to any other scenario such as law... Prove the person didn't commit the murder or he gets life. It is precisely why those alleging a hypot
72.
by ZenPro 12y ago
This thread, more than any other, illustrates why the majority of posters should be ignored. Approximately 50% of the posts are preceded with a variation of - "I am just speculating but..." Why on earth would 99.9% of the people o
73.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Cleaned from what exactly? Post science not speculation.
74.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Anybody who thinks that an enterprise should be stopped if you are not number one is a misguided twit. 1. It would lead to toxic consumer environments with no competition. 2. It would stifle innovation as market incumbents could coast wit
75.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Startup Effectiveness Arrogance. SEA is a niche condition which health professionals believe originated in the second and third generation of SoCal entrepreneurs. No problem in the world exists which a STEM graduate in possession of seed fu
76.
by ZenPro 12y ago
You just wrote down word for word pretty much how I feel. Fellow Brit.
77.
by ZenPro 12y ago
What other views are there? The Falkland Islands existed before the state of Argentina. The islanders voted for self-determination and wished to remain as part of the United Kingdom for defence matters. There is no other view that is com
78.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Does anyone here volunteer extra tax when they don't have to?
79.
by ZenPro 12y ago
This made me smile; wit and astute political observance are rare. :-) Well done Sir.
80.
by ZenPro 12y ago
I never said I was quick to violence. I am normally a very calm person. That comment was ridiculous. In this regard we define "someone's child" as a non-adult. Technically an adult is someone's child but it is unlik
81.
by ZenPro 12y ago
You are right. It is. Thank you for the compliment.
82.
by ZenPro 12y ago
As a parent of three bright children with excellent development reports your comment makes me want to do you considerable violence. Regardless of whether my children were skilled in mathematics or not, if I overhead your derisory attitude
83.
by ZenPro 12y ago
This is utterly misguided from a cultural and a technological viewpoint. Afghanistan is not a unified country but a series of tribal fiefdoms with radically different social environments.
84.
by ZenPro 12y ago
"My view is that it's up to TfL to regulate the industry," said Uber's general manager Jo Bertram speaking to journalists today. 1 [1] http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-05/30/u
85.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Are you simply ignoring every binding legal precedent ever? Of course the law is open to interpretation and Judges not only disagree with each other they also overrule each other depending on the court and case in question.
86.
by ZenPro 12y ago
TL;DR The technological description of a taximeter is out of date and technically TFL cannot find fault with Uber regarding the letter of the law. They are deferring to the High Court to gain a binding ruling based on the spirit of the law
87.
by ZenPro 12y ago
That is exactly what happened. Let us have the laptops or we detain you and search everything. The Guardian. OK. You can have them. Is exactly the same as your example of reasonable policing for a vehicle search. > Here in the US, at
88.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Legal stooge? You are living in your own fucking Le Carre novel. Grow up.
89.
by ZenPro 12y ago
Actually I am a startup CMO. The Government didn't fuck with Journalists. Journalists tried to fuck with the Government and got owned. Exactly the same way the software engineers of the Valley were being owned by the NSA for years.
90.
by ZenPro 12y ago
You still think that they give a fuck? I take your accusation of being an ass to mean "ZenPro is right, I cannot disprove him so I will now result to insults and ad-hominems." Bore off.

More ›