Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Zacharias030
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
I think Alexandria.
32.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
Thanks! mmd.
33.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
touché
34.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
Must have been a program without much trickle down into gov tech
35.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
some of it are cultural products too.
36.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
Do you know of a systematic study of the AG - Lee Sedol match with contemporary KataGo? I’ve never seen this written up.
37.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
The tasuki who put Cho Chikun sensei‘s problems online without solutions as pdfs? Thank you, Sir! I have learned so much from these pdfs.
38.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
I appreciate the discussion as well. After having checked the positions you mentioned, I had put you somewhere in the 4-10 kyu range. For me this was the time when I found out how important it is to play efficient and fast and play big spot
39.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
why is this downvoted?
40.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
I don’t share that sentiment. Yes, at some point when people are somewhat able to take a decent lead home the fuseki becomes important. Before that, beginners really need to understand how to „move“ their stones, how to defend and connect t
41.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
That time when I reverse engineered JRR Tolkien‘s Lord of the rings from symbols engraved on dead trees. Took me three summers…
42.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
I think people often interpret a bit too much. Perhaps it’s just some researchers who got enough freedom to run and publish interesting work within apple. For a company like apple it makes sense to have a research lab with considerable free
43.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
ostensibly it does.
44.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
Yes, but the discussion is about Multi-Token Prediction (Gloeckle et al. 2024) which is only incidentally useful for speculative decoding.
45.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
There is no reason that it couldn’t be beneficial for training though.
46.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
yes, if you know the sequence of tokens ahead of time you can verify them about as quickly as you can generate one more token because of the parallelism benefits. If you don’t know the future tokens though, then you can’t, and blind guessin
47.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
When Swe-Bench was new in 2023, it was — with all due respect — a bit of a niche benchmark in LLM research. LLMs were so incredibly useless at solving these tasks that I think you could find a bit more empathy for the original academic auth
48.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
Thanks for that! where can I find your writing?
49.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
You realize that this problem in SWE-Bench was discovered and publicized by people within those FAANG corporations?
50.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
should be the top comment.
51.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
I agree mostly. They are all that you say, but if you think about the conditional distribution that you are learning, there is nothing preventing us in principle from mapping different contexts to the same responses. It is rather a practica
52.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
While I get that this is how LLMs work, I think you should think backwards from the user / from what AI as a field is aiming for and recognize that the „naive“ way of the parent to ask for reliable responses no matter what the „context
53.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
It is consistent with what the commenter was saying. In any case, for Go - with a mild amount of expert knowledge - this limitation is most likely quite irrelevant unless in very rare endgame situations, or special superko setups, where a l
54.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
unhealthy fumes in the garage!!
55.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
I strongly believe that our concept of intelligence is like the „god of the gaps“ [0]. Intelligent is only what we haven’t yet explained. Chess computers surely must be intelligent, but then deep blue was „just search“. Go computers surely
56.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
how though?
57.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
Wouldn’t you say that now, finally, what people call AI combines subsymbolic systems („gradient descent“) with search and with symbolic systems (tool calls)? I had a professor in AI who was only working on symbolic systems such as SAT-solve
58.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
What do you / your prof think about the timelines though? I always heard people shoot these kinds of arguments down by saying that evolution does not significantly operate on our accelerated timelines of human technology.
59.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
I thought IPOs don‘t generally pop though this one has? You can buy VTI which takes about 7% allocation in every IPO, but I heard there is research by some folks at Harvard and practiced by dimensional fund advisors‘ funds that buying IPOs
60.
▲
by
Zacharias030
1y ago
Expect or not, I think it would have made all the difference. It seemed like a historical, Nelson Mandela scale opportunity with all international, regional and domestic & Palestinian winds in Israels back. And then they used it to one
More ›