Yokohiii

8 ms·

181.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
The inherent lack of distinction for LLMs between code, structured formats and natural language is ridiculous. Before the AI era we had a trend to increase type safety everywhere. Now we just sling code and natural text around and hope it w
182.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
> In your "time complexity is a downstream requirement" example, which is a great one, I think you would prefer to have well-maintained written documentation of that criterion that lives outside of the procedural code itself, w
183.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
> You plan in order to understand the whole problem space. I like to do spikes to understand problem spaces before planning. The planning is then usually effortless and just to get in sync with stakeholders. But in that regard AI coding
184.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
> The important part is a human-auditable directive, not an opaque, generated artifact as the thing that matters. Your arguments create a false dichotomy. You look at it from consumer perspective, while coding and it's artifacts are
185.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
upgraded today and they've put the kernel module install override in place. (wsl2/ubuntu)
186.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
I am not sold on the federated thing to solve CSAM or similar issues. Actually companies should be bullied about privacy and copyright so they are unable to share any contents at a scale with 3rd parties. Thus they have to solve it on their
187.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
These workers prepare data for AI. I don't think the need for them will go away anyway soon. Westeners are too expensive and unwilling to do it. AI is a business model that requires poverty and extreme inequality to function. Yes other
188.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
LLMs know pretty well about this. This is just a handy list for humans that want to do stuff.
189.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
> That's unfixable until operating systems start reliably shipping their own prebaked models that an API like this could plug into. Maybe the next big thing will be some software subscription premium offers with a bunch of 5090s as
190.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
He blames everyone and everything for his own bad decisions. For sure he is unbearable.
191.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
I cannot believe the audacity that this guy finds problems everywhere, but at no time admit his own failures. Anyone that runs an agent with just soft guardrails ("hey don't do that, please") is asking for the worst outcome.
192.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
stop
193.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
my statement was in response to "fs.readSync shouldn't exist". that is how.
194.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
he was referring to fs.readSync (node) which has also has fs.read, which is async. there is also no parallelism in node. i don't see it as very useful or elegant to integrate any form for parallelism or concurrency into every imaginab
195.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
I mean single threaded + sync. Sync options are useful. If everything is on the net probably less so. But if you have a couple of 1ms io ops that you want to get done asap, it's better to get them done asap.
196.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
Really? async/await is the model that makes it really easy to ignore all the subtleties of asynchronous code and just go with it. You just need to trial and error where/when to put async/await keywords. It's not hard to
197.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
Using globals or arguments is a free choice independent of the context. If I call async code I don't have a choice.
198.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
Returning errors isn't function coloring, it's fundamental language design choice by go.
199.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
Maybe I am missing something. But the function coloring problem is basically the tension that async can dominate call hierarchies and the sync code in between looses it's beneficial properties to a degree. It's at least awkward to
200.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
this is a commercial sales pitch for something that doesn't exist
201.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
Sure. Just claim random shit.
202.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
Convenient defense.
203.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
You are actively misunderstanding me. Of course I can differ your text from quoted text. Is that really the way you see disagreement? Others got you wrong in the most miserable way? You insinuated that I've accused you of sexism. Which
204.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
There are cases of severe mistreatment and I oppose your utilitarian perspective on the situation. If I travel to the US and my chance is 0.01% to go to jail for several weeks, without reason, I won't go. In these cases the US agencies
205.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
An expert level human doesn't have to be expert at every programming category. A webdev wouldn't spot a use after free. A systems engineer wouldn't know about CSRF. That is if both don't research security beyond their fi
206.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
The whole discussion started out as an attempt to disprove/verify anthropics (model card) claims. He also transfers the logic of their claims to the actual real world. You can say that model cards are marketing garbage. You have to pro
207.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
I said she didn't claim to be an expert. I said you consider yourself an intellectual. Don't twist my words for your false arguments. I wanted to hear from you that you are just slamming her for the sake of it. I got multiple answ
208.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
She didn't claim to be an expert, so she doesn't have to satisfy any "standards". You consider yourself intellectual but you don't apply benefit of the doubt? You neither offered reasonable correction, only a thin b
209.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
Currently some EU citizens are already wary traveling to the US for various reasons. Lets see. "Is it safe to travel to the US as an EU citizen of arab descend?" GPT: Yes it's safe. GEMINI: Yes but... [gave a few legitimate
210.
by Yokohiii 6mo ago
I take that non response as a yes.

More ›