Yokohiii

5 ms·

61.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
That is the misinterpretation. You apply the shift of capabilities only to one portion, the devs. Why wouldn't it change management positions? You already name it, the headcount goes down, also less managers. Why even have a CTO?
62.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
I mean that is a classic problem right? We know that outsourced green field projects done by third parties are tend to be low quality or at least are slow and expensive to integrate into a business. Many issues arise when you try to deploy
63.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
> Now everybody has superpowers. I think that it's very odd how AI enthusiasts misinterpret the situation. If it turns out to be good enough to produce greenfield projects with agentic coding, then it will not only affect developers
64.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
The person who starts reading ahead into pi will always gets the freshest numbers. Perfect crypto!
65.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Around here it just means chrisp ratt.
66.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
He prepared the comment a month ago.
67.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Yes but it's illegal to replicate it. A different story if LLMs lift license restrictions.
68.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
More is better.
69.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
> I liken it to having children. Conceiving them is fun. Delivering them is painful. Raising them, is a lifetime of work. I am not a children person. But I love this analogy. To deliver something nice, we also must accept some suffering.
70.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Currently some act like it is fine to translate a project and change the license. Recently Casey Muratori said in a adjacent context that the microsoft AI push may be related to the fact that they have a long standing and elaborate codebase
71.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Okay name is taken. Let's rename it to Grift.
72.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Wordpress is/was successful because it's braindead and has a solid userbase. I am not to flame WP, but it's a quality to target a specific group of consumers. It's an organic success, hard to replicate. If at all, CF can
73.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
He will be probably super happy for starring the project.
74.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Well you could make your point clear, instead you keep acting like I am hostile.
75.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
You make up an false dichotomy. The differentiation between the title and the supposed skill level based on title, is neither true nor helpful to make your point.
76.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
The distinction between developer and engineer is obviously that one adds "make no mistakes!!!1."
77.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
There is no universally accepted distinction between developer and engineer. Even if so, dev or engineer, both can be low or high skill. Their job title doesn't tell how sloppy or good their LLM usage will be.
78.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
I guess some people don't like articles that don't deliver a skill.md to solve a problem. For me the article is about programmer culture and work ethics, it's hard to discuss with hard facts. Yet sharing this personal experie
79.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
> basically threatening me to take more ownership, do more work, for the same pay I am a bit curious here. Does that simply mean to should to extra hours and do bullshit duties or is there actually more coding work opportunities? Or do t
80.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
> painfully forefront of mind that they're smarter than most everyone around them Many devs choose to just do their day job or decide to follow a cargo cult. Probably not every dev can have the same output, but if you decide to keep
81.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Well the previous commenter mentioned the trump/sanders crossvoting, I guess you just ignored that to focus in the ideologies. Maybe it just reads weird or I read it weird, to read trump at some point and someone else ending the senten
82.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
> expressions of the same underlying ideology of human equality I have no clue how any equality minded person could vote republicans or trump. I get that you want to point out the overlap of the ideologies, but I don't see how they
83.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
I am sure the tech industry will try to further reduce headcount. The question is what jobs emerge. We already see companies laying off, just to hire "AI interns". If AI + lower skill engineers turn out to be valuable, it also bec
84.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
> THE CYPHERNOMICON I've peeked into that one. I've expected those people to be radical to some degree, but I didn't expect they write it down so clearly. This writing wants to see the collapse of governments and democracy
85.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Of course they can, but if you give a LLM a specific rule, what happens is that it only shifts the probability of following the rule. Prohibiting a rule violation is technically impossible via prompting. Humans do make mistakes or forget th
86.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
Learning a company and it's product is so natural to us that we hardly talk about it. It's a key skill for reliable workers. It's probably impossible for LLMs to learn and apply that wisdom reliably .
87.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
> With LLMs, only the "best" engineers will survive, because nobody needs mediocre engineers anymore. I don't think this is true. A good engineer doesn't have infinite throughput. In my opinion the best engineers shou
88.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
For me this is a push to segment the market into consumer and industrial grade RAM. Even NVIDIA and MS are not stupid enough to think they can keep going with RAM prices exploding. Consumers need hardware to subscribe to their AI stuff. LLM
89.
by Yokohiii 4mo ago
> in an agent-first world casual gaslighting
90.
by Yokohiii 5mo ago
Jai isn't even available publicly. The license isn't decided. Jonathan Blow doesn't want to deal with open source. Comparing Jai and Zig on that behalf is crazy. Edit: If that is about political activism it's even more c

More ›