Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Ygg2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
64 ms
·
841.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
JSON is a human readable format. Machine readable means only a specialized program can be used to make human understand it.
842.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
I'm not sure who said it, but the quote went something like this: Programmers are at fault for the current status in Computer Science, rather than working on expanding their knowledge they keep chasing the latest fad. If someone knows
843.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
No, it actually had a decent plot, characters and conclusion, unlike the first two seasons. They had plot and plot vessels but nothing else. If you are old enough to memberberry, then you should be old enough to remember original Star Trek:
844.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> All those "Negative user focused" No. Those are issues caused by users. You could have most open hardware platform, and it would still persist. See any OSS maintainer complaining about unrealistic user expectations. > I co
845.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
Are droughts, fires or fast winds unknown conditions in LA? A government should be preparing for them. Doubly so a government that believes in climate change. Which was the opposite of what happened with firemen raising warnings but they fa
846.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> transportation infrastructure, education, fire departments, Didn't recent events like LA fires demonstrate just how neglected those services are. Having a better military in a war is great, but having overtly fat military industri
847.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
Table formatting credit goes to Obsidian Text. I'm just surprised it worked so well with Google Drive copy-pasta.
848.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> Did you read the article? Did you read the rest of it? Sure Apple being not as great to develop drivers, but ~99% of the article is about displeasure working with Linux maintainers. EDIT: Here is the breakdown by paragraphs. | Pa
849.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
This isn't an Apple issue. Maybe Linux on Apple is inherently more problematic, but the issue here came from Linux maintainers hostility towards Rust.
850.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> cultural comments that invalidate the point trying to be made for no real reason. Like the race or location of the parent determines their childhood? You have two kids, one ate ten boxes of marshmallows yesterday, the other didn'
851.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
That's not a good metric. For every Linux kernel drama, you drop something more interesting, like a less watched PapersWeLove conference.
852.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
What do you mean? That wasn't a Q&A session, they interrupted the speaker and ate all the time arguing. The speaker didn't get to finish his presentation. This makes me think, whoever wrote these top 100 talks has either quest
853.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> This is false? Computers have gotten a lot faster Depends, what you mean by much. Single threaded performance is no longer 2x fast after a year. I mean, even in the GPU section, you get graphics that looks slightly better for 2-4x the
854.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
They aren't insane, just not thrifty with their money.
855.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
No sane individual is going to buy 5090 for $2000-100000 and hook it up to a $15 Power supply.
856.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
Caterpillar? Too high tech. I just restart the universe until the problem is pre-solved.
857.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
"It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of Sapho that the thoughts acquire speed, the lips acquire stains the stains become a warning. It is by will alone I set my mind it motion..."
858.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
They're called pattern types because the intention is to allow them to match a Rust pattern expression (more or less, no idea how conditionals would work).
859.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
There is a pdf of presentation in the link... Pattern types or liquid types or dependent types are a way to express a subset of a type. E.g. type NonNull = usize is 1.. type PokerNonFaceCard = u8 is 2..11
860.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> My understanding, its significantly safer than Rust (and based on Ada) with equal performance. Ada or Ada Spark? Ada Spark is more of a theorem prover, so the comparison to Rust is a bit weird. It's true it's safer - it will
861.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
Season 3 wasn't that bad.
862.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
I also disagree, first off rand is working on simplifying it. Plus out of those dependencies it's hard to see something I'd rather do myself than trust other people with. Windows-sys is necessary for w Windows OS kernel, libc is s
863.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> Why? Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. Or re-re-reinvent Lisp. There was this anecdote about storm lamp or something. New recruit comes to a camp and sees old guard lighting lamps are turned upside down and lit sid
864.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
Nuget is .Net, no?
865.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> Christoph Hellwig is one of the oldest subsystem maintainer. Also it's not his domain, from Marcan's Reddit response Greg is one in charge of maintaining this area. So this is drive by reviewing.
866.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
Even if you put that aside, the problem is you offer Hellwig two solutions and he NACKs them both. H: I don't want to support multilanguage codebase R: We'll have a maintainer verify R4L is behaving properly. H: I solved i
867.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
Nothing, it's the principle of the thing. I.e. when you make a challenging to evaluate statement, the burden of proof is on the one making the claim. If I say "Moon is made of millennia old cheese", the burden of proof isn&#x
868.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
> it appears the clr author anticipated you: you didnt fork it, try, and fail, so you have ceded the authority to credibly make your speculative complaint That's a caveat. Not an expectation. Plus that's not how proof works. Ne
869.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
If you present an argument that you like X in a thing so you picked B, and A exist that's more X than B, it means your argument is partially (you like X and Z) or totally (you like Y) wrong. In this context of, if you are using Zig for
870.
▲
by
Ygg2
2y ago
You traded ease of writing for ease of long term ease of debugging, I don't think we agree.
More ›