Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
XorNot
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
151.
▲
by
XorNot
2mo ago
> You neither need not count on someone who wrote a thesis on 'feminist perspective of aztek dance' or some nonsense like that. I like how this criticism can never point to anything real, people just make something up and then
152.
▲
by
XorNot
2mo ago
I mean technically we already do this: renewable plantation timber is a widespread operation (also why I get kind of annoyed at YouTubers talking about how great the timber is in old homes - yes it's great because it was logged from 50
153.
▲
by
XorNot
2mo ago
+1 for Turing Complete, it's absolutely marvelous.
154.
▲
by
XorNot
2mo ago
Yeah the constraints in pyproject is exactly the issue I'm thinking of.
155.
▲
by
XorNot
2mo ago
Are we likely to get an "uv upgrade" command that makes sense sometime? It's still very obtuse how to get uv to just try and make all my dependencies the highest version possible.
156.
▲
by
XorNot
2mo ago
Who's waiting? The problem is the populations we need to distribute it to can least afford it. The reason we want a vaccine is because there's a huge logistics difference between a twice yearly injection and the real magic of some
157.
▲
by
XorNot
2mo ago
The world produces so much excess food we pay farmers not to grow it and fast fashion brands burn unsold merchandise in the desert.
158.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
Liberty is given up in inches, not miles. The offenses of a regime at its apex would've led to it being stopped had they started out that way, but they didn't. What you've hit on is the basic problem of treating privacy as a
159.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
Sure but there'd be nothing there. If the regime is going to just start taking people then nothing will stop that, but the goal is to stop the usefulness of this sort of thing as an intimidation measure - or at least drag it to the for
160.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
Why would you replace it? That asset likely has at least 10 years in it if you already have it.
161.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
You're right I misread it - the headline number is inline with the other quoted values of closer to 1 in 320,000 or so.
162.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
I mean the other way round: rather then combat drones launching missiles, combat drones which use stealth and speed to close to dogfighting distances with aircraft and engage with their own cannons. It may be that risking some drone airfram
163.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
And yet the Russian war machine pushes on. Opening up ways to pressure the Russian economy in a war of choice does equate to achieving decisive battlefield advantages. There's a reason those drones hit oil refineries and not steel work
164.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
I don't know where you're getting that number from. For all dental anesthesia the risk rate seems to be literally 1 in a million [1] and the various law firms which popped up during that search suggested better then 1 in 300,000 a
165.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
No aircraft which can fulfill the CCA type role is going to be "disposable". All the systems in that performance bracket are in the 20-40 million range minimum. The most persistent thing misunderstanding about drones is people ima
166.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
That's the current meta though is the thing and it could change. There's a plausible world where drone-aircraft are reliable enough at missile evasion that a decent strategy is to get in close and use the cannons because your en
167.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
Which cheap drones? Specifically which systems are currently out-competing F-16s in air to air combat in either trials or combat?
168.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
Also there's just an absolutely bonkers number of F-16s in service today. Using them as Loyal Wingman type aircraft would look pretty appealing cost wise.
169.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
It certainly matters as familiar sounding words to their stock holders to please not drop the valuation. Because what they want them to think is "the AI factory has unique proprietary technology that cannot be replicated" What the
170.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
They make and sell food in an age where literally everyone has a high quality camera in their pocket. In their core business they're not going to show an actual picture of the actual product they intend to provide? In an age where pe
171.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
For food in addition to the false advertising it's just going to be the uncanny valley: there's thousands of years of evolutionary motivation to try and assess if food is safe. Any amount of "wrongness" will put people r
172.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
The amount of time I spend per day waiting for my web browser to do about 10 redirects through Okta and touch a Yubikey is substantial.
173.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
This is marketing. Frankly I'm inclined to say that it might also be faked: this drops just days after a new Chinese model does with the usual effect on OAIs projected stock price?
174.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
Trying to keep data on a USB drive hidden long term is a losing game is the thing. If you're intercepted with anything of value what you want is to rapidly destroy it. This was the big problem I found when I was trying to figure out a
175.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
My personal hypothesis here is the Chinese government looked at the game and simply decided not to play: An astute Chinese analyst could reasonably forecast that they had little chance of controlling the AI market due to sovereign trust iss
176.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
I'll die on the hill that Helm charts are more of a problem because text/templating is a weird looking templating language then anything else.
177.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
No definitely weird.
178.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
Or just two to four robots working as a team.
179.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
God this whole comment section is weird. It's like all the people who are so proud they don't use dishwashers.
180.
▲
by
XorNot
3mo ago
I mean I like the much lower rates of dysentery and untreatable skin and dental conditions... People have an extremely rosey view of the past shaped by the fact that period dramas are acted by modern Hollywood actors.
More ›