Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Xelynega
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
361.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
If you're trying to search for a specific resistor without the prerequisite domain knowledge, how will you be able to vet whether or not the answer given by a language model meets your needs? Imagining that language models like gpt wil
362.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
This makes me think of a quote from one of Dijkstra's lectures: "In the long run I expect computing science to transcend its parent disciplines, mathematics and logic, by effectively realizing a significant part of Leibniz's
363.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
> "list the plates of blue Hondas in this area at this time, that have [...]" I think this shows a significant misunderstanding of what chatgpt does fundamentally. It will never be able to do this unless also fed a description,
364.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Garbage interspersed in the input, garbage interspersed in the output.
365.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Do you have anything to add to the discussion other than calling people "high on [their] own farts"?
366.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
The problem with even short recessions is that we should question whether or not we really need actual people to endure actual hardships while worker efficiency continues upwards for the sake of imaginary numbers.
367.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
1) It's not a given that a single panopticon is better than more than one. In my opinion "anybody can see the data" is a better scenario than "CloudFlare can monetize the data". 2) I don't see why the workflow
368.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
1. CloudFlare already gets this information since they're getting the unencrypted DNS traffic. The actual argument you're making here is that a single company owning all the data is a better situation than anybody being able to se
369.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
I don't think their suggestion was "just do what chrome does", it was "make your browser indistinguishable from chrome so that Google trying to create a seperate browser standard breaks websites for other browsers".
370.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Then the features aren't supported in the browser and you should file a bug report to the vendor. Having the developers that use a tool work around the bugs in that tool is a recipe for having millions of repeated lines of code that do
371.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Isn't the issue here that a breaking change was introduced in a new standard version that only some browsers implement. Why can this not be solved with http version numbers instead of a method that allows Google to maintain a seperate
372.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
You can notify all users until a major browser vendor fixes a known bug without a user agent.
373.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Why does bobs bakery need 2-3 retail locations with 2 seperate baking facilities each for a community to have access to a seasame and non-seasame options We already have a working model for gluten free bakeries where they are independently
374.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
The other reasonable choice is to not produce non-seasame items in ways that can potentially cross-cobtaminate with sesame items, or vice versa. If a bakery is jumping through hoops just to make a batch of sesame buns daily, I think there&#
375.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
And the allergies can't also be a mutation/adaptation? Wouldn't some "processed food or medicine that triggers these severe allergies" be a "mutation/adaptation"? I'm confused on the distinction
376.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Because people have food allergies, and should have a right to know whether or not the food they're consuming has been cross-contaminated by allergens? How did we end up in a place where the companies aren't putting the cross-cont
377.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Those were capable of nothing but streaming games(didn't even have a native web browser). Why would it be comparable at all to a machine that runs games locally?
378.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
I'm ascribing a desirable future to be beyond consumerism, so I'm critiquing an article called "the future our grandchildren deserve" that is based in consumerism.
379.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
> It's true that history shows examples of communities managing their common resources over generations. This need not be the default; when it isn't you get the tragedy of the commons It looks like you're agreeing that cou
380.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Or is most of the difficulty in trying to convince people who've read articles about "the tragic of the commons" and think that's the natural state of the world that they're wrong?
381.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
That's a question that's nearly irrelevant to determining if overfishing is because of a tradgedy of the commons. If post-brexit overfishing numbers increase, what evidence is there that the increase is due to individual greed and
382.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
This isn't an article titled "what your kids should pursue to live comfortably", it's called "the future our grandchildren deserve". Having the ability to pursue a "low paying career" when you're
383.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Lol. 1) ok than what is the difference between doxxing and sending my friend an address on Google. According to you the public availability of the information isn't the difference, so I'm curious where it is or if you consider tha
384.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
The "why do you care" argument kind of falls on deaf ears when we all give our consent to discuss the contents of the article, and continue to give our consent as we actually reply to comments. If bill gates in the past was "
385.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Considering that everyone has a chance to make personal decisions, but most people won't have the opportunity to make philanthropic decisions, can you see why the personal decisions someone makes are really the only thing important to
386.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Oh yea, why criticize consumerism when we can just destroy planets and leave them behind to look for more resources to consume?
387.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
It's all you "need" from one perspective, but if the topic is "the future our grandchildren deserve" than a criticism of consumerism that seeks to eradicate it is relevant(IMO) and isn't equivalent to minimizin
388.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Math education: Microsoft hires hundreds of math graduates yearly, an excess of those would be beneficial to Microsofts bottom line. Ultrasound technology: Microsoft has a "digital health" department that would benefit similarly f
389.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
Doesn't Microsoft have a partnership with OpenAI, who's product is essentially "getting people in third world countries to create datasets to train their models"? I don't see how funneling the people in these countr
390.
▲
by
Xelynega
4y ago
My answer is we don't, and anythung a foundation like this puts effort towards is going to be biased(I've yet to see the gates foundation take up a social cause that would affect Microsoft's bottom line). The whole idea of ch
More ›