XelNika

10 ms·

61.
by XelNika 7y ago
Better power management has reduced overall power consumption by almost a watt. https://www.hackster.io/news/raspberry-pi-4-firmware-updates...
62.
by XelNika 7y ago
Lol, his about page pulls a 1.42 MB font to display eleven characters in a light font weight instead of my system font. On a page that would otherwise be ~30 KB.
63.
by XelNika 7y ago
The article already addresses that. Cross-site caching is blocked in Safari and will be blocked in Chrome in the future.
64.
by XelNika 7y ago
Non-IT people make IT decisions all the time. If you can sell your IT product to C-levels, they'll force IT to use it. Look at how companies misuse things like blockchain, ML and AI just because of the hype around those words.
65.
by XelNika 7y ago
> I would love to know who uses "serverless" instead of "in-process". Why add a new term at all? "In-process" is meaningless to non-IT people, they don't even know what a process is. The SQLite dev pro
66.
by XelNika 7y ago
> The accelerometer, gyroscope and proximity sensor has a ~9% false ratio here which I intepret as 9% laptops/desktops and 91% phones. Some of the stats are clearly broken. For the 7 day duration, those stats are closer to 95% false
67.
by XelNika 7y ago
It doesn't say 2007 anywhere, but the page is clearly at least that old. https://web.archive.org/web/20071115173112/https://www.sqlit... I also found material from 2004 with the term. https:/&
68.
by XelNika 7y ago
> What would be the advantage of using the web interface vs. just using a native mail client ? For a generation of people who have only ever had a single email provider, the web interface works well enough. Native mail clients have disad
69.
by XelNika 7y ago
I think it's worth pointing out that this is about an article and a Reddit discussion posted literally yesterday. A fork might already have been on the way. Maybe someone was working in a private repo. It's clearly a worse solutio
70.
by XelNika 7y ago
Creating a fork is generally not the optimal solution. Both current and future users benefit from a patch, only those that hear about it benefit from a fork. Now, in a case like this where the maintainer won't accept patches, yes, fork
71.
by XelNika 7y ago
Right, so what's the point in switching to Oil as a scripting language when that hasn't happened?
72.
by XelNika 7y ago
I don't really think Oil is relevant to this topic. The only good reason I can think of for someone to script in bash is for portability purposes. If someone wanted portability without bash's shitty syntax, something like Python w
73.
by XelNika 7y ago
I have a couple of Seagate IronWolf drives that are rated at 1 URE per 10^15 bits read and, sure, depending on the capacity you want (basically 8 TB and smaller desktop drives are super cheap), they do cost up to 40% more than their Barracu
74.
by XelNika 7y ago
I don't really see the issue. It changes nothing from the DNS client's perspective.
75.
by XelNika 7y ago
> Keep in mind that RAID5 isn’t feasible with multi-TB disks (the probability of failed blocks when rebuilding the array is far too high). What makes you say that? I've seen plenty of people make this claim based on URE rates, but I