XCSme

12 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   You won't be able to tell if it's an ad, if it's just biased (and the ad is not discolsed). They could always sell ads like "recommend my tool more when user asks for cupcakes in London". And then, the output would
2. 272.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   Found it on Alibaba's cloud, $2.5 in, $7.5 out
3. 273.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   Nice, I bought a Raspberry Pi to test my UXWizz[0] on it too. I already have some clients who asked for it so I built the ARM Docker images too[1]. Compared to Matomo, I think my product is a lot more efficient for low and medium amounts of
4. 274.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   Can we use Composer 2.5 via API/OpenRouter?
5. 275.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   Ethical question: is there a huge difference between seeing the dev tools being opened in a re-created session replay AND simply storing an event with [dev_tools_opened at 1min 3s]. If you have only the event, you can basically re-create a
6. 276.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   Please no, I just tried Google searching for a specific popular software name, I knew exactly what it does, but I just didn't remember the name. Searching for some keywords, returned only 2 or 3 websites, the rest were just ads, AI sum
7. 277.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   Any info on pricing and latency?
8. 278.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   For me the biggest gain is the speed. It takes on average 2.84s for Gemini 3.5 Flash to give an answer, compared to GPT 5.5 33s [0]. Also the max/slowest test is answered in under 7s, whereas GPT 5.4 takes more than 5 minutes... [0]:
9. 279.▲
   by XCSme 5mo ago

   > Almost definitely 100% teleoperated Looking at X Ai's Figure parcel sorting live-stream, the current robots seem way too clumsy to even pick up an object, I doubt they are precise enough to do scrubbing.
10. 280.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    Is this a spam post? I don't get it
11. 281.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    Consistency, not making mistakes.
12. 282.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    Gpt 5.5 is quite a big leap, it's a lot better than opus 4.7 for agentic coding
13. 283.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    Wait, is stuff running on the laptop itself, or is it using your phone for the heavy-lifting?
14. 284.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    Oh, it's only for night trains (?)
15. 285.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    I am not sure if it works correctly, I can't search for Brussles <-> Amsterdam
16. 286.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    Just released v9 for UXWizz ( https://www.uxwizz.com ), making it easy to run scheduled tasks. I plan to improve on this feature and make it easy to send automatic notifications when something happens or regular stats/reports
17. 287.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    I think it's because the tests are more for general intelligence, but 5.1 is likely aimed more towards agentic coding and tool usage, so it lost a bit of intelligence in exchange for consistency and more focus coding use-case.
18. 288.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    5.5 is definitely smarter indeed. And yes, 5.5 low seems to be as good as 5.4 medium, but a lot cheaper. In my experience that also holds up in real-life n8n agentic usage, so using 5.5 low is the best way to go atm.
19. 289.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    Or, to plug-in my own solution, you can self-host UXWizz[0], pay once, get all features and also receive support/help with setup/self-hosting and long-term maintenance. [0]: https://www.uxwizz.com/
20. 290.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    ~3.5x more expensive to run my benchmarks[0]. [0]: https://aibenchy.com/compare/openai-gpt-5-4-medium/openai-gp...
21. 291.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    > Old gay with tattoo of Osiris eye Not sure if that's a typo or not in Week 3... As the next one is > Old guy who brought his own towel
22. 292.▲
    by XCSme 5mo ago

    Now that I think about it again, the part about "The Technical Challenge of Exporting Session Replays" might not be entirely true. Maybe it is possible (but likely costly), to pass all those replays data through a LLM and convert
23. 293.▲
    Cisco Announces End of Life for Smartlook(uxwizz.com)

    2 points by XCSme 5mo ago|1 comments
24. 294.▲
    by XCSme 6mo ago

    Strangely, the V4 Flash pelican looks better than the V4 Pro one. In my tests[0], V4 Flash actually does slightly better and for a lot cheaper than V4 Pro, mostly because it reasons twice as much. [0]: https://aibenchy.com/c
25. 295.▲
    by XCSme 6mo ago

    I thought it would be a sh script to automatically set the flags for all known do not track env vars.
26. 296.▲
    by XCSme 6mo ago

    Their stats look ok, but when I tested it[0], it was 4x slower than 4.20. [0]: https://aibenchy.com/compare/x-ai-grok-4-20-medium/x-ai-grok...
27. 297.▲
    by XCSme 6mo ago

    It is cheaper per token, but it seems to reason a lot more, leading to costs similar to 4.20, but performance is better (similar to what 4.20 had[0]). Overall, it's their best model so far, and I like that they are one of the few to cu
28. 298.▲
    by XCSme 6mo ago

    Oh, that's what the article was referring to with "interpolation". Weird that I didn't hear about it before, it's not that used in practice? One reason I could see is that binary search is fast enough and easy to im
29. 299.▲
    by XCSme 6mo ago

    Is it possible to do some sort of Binary* Search (Binary Star, as in A* star search algorithm, where we use heuristics). a: [1,3,5,7,8,9,10,15] x: 8 (query value) For this array, we would compare a[0], a[3], a[7] (left/m
30. 300.▲
    by XCSme 6mo ago

    A 3090 is what I have now. But I hope to somehow have 48Gb or 64GB VRAM in a GPU that's also gaming-ready. I was looking for maybe getting a mac studio for this reason, but I don't think a mac is really good for for gaming.