X4

55 ms·

301.
by X4 13y ago
tbh. that doesn't satisfy me , because infinity isn't something that we cannot understand. Actually infinity is much easier to understand than the big bang theory. When there is one thing that nature has thought us from day 1 to
302.
by X4 13y ago
So, do you say that physical laws in this space, may not hold in another space? That there is one or more variables, which control at which set-point our physical laws (the instruction tape) are begining and ending?
303.
by X4 13y ago
Thinking about the universe as a massive black hole, whereas black holes are a concept that is still not entirely known makes thinking about this subject highly speculative. This list only adds salt to that wound: http://en.wiki
304.
by X4 13y ago
I hope I don't ask for too much, but would you be so kind and please give all us the chance to understand what you mean? I have not the references that back this up, could you add these? (I am not biased. But I know two people working
305.
by X4 13y ago
No, that is not what's believed in general, but gains in attractivity as a possible solution. That's because, it's simpler. I have read about it on various blogs and have also seen an inspiring TED talk about it, before it go
306.
by X4 13y ago
Usually I wouldn't agree with this kind of comments, but this is the exception. We shouldn't forget that there is a multi-million dollar company behind this and it's clearly not just open-sourced for beneficiary reasons. What
307.
by X4 13y ago
Yes, but this theory is simpler compared to the 10+ dimensions of string theory and m-theory.
308.
by X4 13y ago
Is physics a turing machine too? It bends, moves, burns,freezes etc. things according to it's instruction tape (laws)?
309.
by X4 13y ago
wow, this thread gets more and more interesting. I think the discovery of the holographic universe just broke all norms and worldviews of physics for the most of us.
310.
by X4 13y ago
If I get this right, then the irony here is, that everybody is correct and wrong at the same time. Just draw some dots, circles etc. on paper and it could be that one day that non-local representation of the holographic universe holds true.
311.
by X4 13y ago
Hmm.. does that mean that E=mc² is only correct for our dimension? Because, if you say that matter is a side-effect and not something like "higgs particle", then this doesn't hold up anymore. I mean not everything we don&#x27
312.
by X4 13y ago
It means in essence, that we live in the two-dimensional space, which contains just enough information (thanks to interference patterns), to be projectable to the 3rd dimension. In holographic duality, this is a way to derive a more compl
313.
Hipache: a distributed HTTP and websocket proxy (NodeJS)(github.com)
1 points by X4 13y ago|0 comments
314.
by X4 13y ago
The possibilities are endless, just add a websocket proxy as a front-server and you can allow dynamic and even secure control of an entire infrastructure (given that you add auth layer). Here's something you could use for that: https:
315.
by X4 13y ago
no. you can still chain xinetd.
316.
by X4 13y ago
yup new, but use a restricted jailed and chrooted shell. Ask your #sysadmin of choice =) You can even build a REST like API wrapper for this. That's what I was going to do.
317.
by X4 13y ago
Thanks lhaussknecht That's also what I thought! I don't understand the negativity here! "Oh, this is a toy. Oh, this doesn't meet my Enterprise needs. Oh, this isn't EAL7¹ Certified, I can't run my Atombomb de
318.
by X4 13y ago
wow, seems like it's true that there are always two people with the same idea, somewhere on earth. Or, how they would say it in Germany: "Two idiots, same idea." To me, the MDN to MSDN portal similarity is also a striking sym
319.
by X4 13y ago
MDN and MSDN. Ok, this is maybe just coincidence, but their portal pages do look similar. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/ vs http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
320.
NoMachine – Remote desktop and virtual desktop infrastructure for everybody(nomachine.com)
4 points by X4 13y ago|0 comments
321.
by X4 13y ago
Clever. I see your point making sense, when you simplify this to just a pre-processing phase. But as you said, it just delays rendering needlessly. What Browser Vendors really want are online one-pass algorithms.
322.
by X4 13y ago
ygra: that's because IE implements that hack into it's core.
323.
by X4 13y ago
Is any of the conference videos available online, or is that only for paying customers?
324.
by X4 13y ago
THAT is really weird! Because in NLP and Machine Translation the symmetric translation of text is seen as proof that the algorithm works perfectly. And I had the opinion, that professional linguists or bilingualists, should all come up with
325.
Gibson Index – Cyber Attack Impact Ranking System(gibsonindex.org)
1 points by X4 13y ago|0 comments
326.
by X4 13y ago
Exactly.
327.
by X4 13y ago
In which WebApp project did you use deep learning? What problem did you solve with it?
328.
PayPal Hacked? No, phising just got more sophisticated
3 points by X4 13y ago|2 comments
329.
Ask HN: Large gov project ahead. Howto avoid the CMS Trap?
2 points by X4 13y ago|1 comments
330.
HTML5 Bones - How to use HTML5 structural elements(github.com)
1 points by X4 13y ago|0 comments

More ›