Wytwwww

23 ms·

361.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Sure but most users are not interacting directly with the "Linux" part (and probably they don't have much interest in that anyway). IMHO Linux is mostly an implementation detail for the Steam Deck/OS. So sure we can put
362.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Having different shortcuts for the same operation in different applications is just wrong. > Windows can never become a credible developer OS. For better or for worse it has been one for decades. > Keeping ctrl-C as the binding for co
363.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Still too small. Also it's hardly a general purpose device, Linux is only there to run Steam.
364.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> Terminal has historical bindings Keeping that as a default is silly though. Intentionally having poor UX that's unnecessarily confusing to new users because of "reasons" is why Linux can never become a credible consumer
365.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> Inconsistent shortcuts Can it be more inconsistent than copy-paste working differently in the terminal and all other apps, though? Of course it's trivial to change and Linux is more or less fully configurable (e.g. NumLock being
366.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> Why can’t I ctrl-v after ctrl-c from web browser? Same reasons numlock being off is still the default and a bunch of other silly defaults (that are of course trivial to change but are still annoying): masochism combined with the need t
367.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Why? I don't see any signs of that happening. The only real major success stories for Linux in the consumer space Android and Chrome OS are effectively (of course not technically) proprietary(ish).
368.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> My overall point is that there is little indication that this is some battle between good and evil or right and wrong. I wouldn't necessarily use words like 'good' and 'evil' here but the fact that a judge can
369.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Nobody has been talking about arresting Musk himself, rather employees or representatives of Twitter who are required to be present in Brazil just for this specific reason (i.e. so that they could be arrested and used as bargaining chips to
370.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Sure, I can't really argue with any of that. How is it even remotely relevant in this case though?
371.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Yes, and? Doesn't mean that anyone who could avoid it should feel compelled to accept that when this is done by an arbitrary and corrupt government. Also I'm not sure it's very common for courts to arrest lawyers (and basical
372.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
It's nice to see a government which is threatening to fine its citizens US$8,900 per day for using a website which was banned because it didn't remove the accounts of that government's political opponents?
373.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
DDR4 to DDR5 is a pretty big jump, though. Up to 20-30% on Intel depending on what you're doing. Of course it might not be that significant on AMD which (IIRC) struggles with higher frequencies anyway and at least for gaming memory spe
374.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> If you want to lower crime, ask a Finn or Norwegian how they did it. Has crime there ever been high? If not how can they tell you anything if they never had to do anything to "fix" it?
375.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
What do you mean by "socialist policies" exactly? Ignoring petty crime is somehow a socialist policy? You say all of those things and the mention the Soviet Union etc. Which makes very little sense because if modern Western countr
376.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
But you're logging actual data with those? Or do they make tooth brushes which monitor your mouth's biome or something like that these days?
377.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
I think this has already been the case for years? Mono didn't really have much of a point after MS opensource .NET and ported it to other platforms.
378.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
To be fair that % of revenue Unity was historically getting from most of its customer that were actually making meaningful amounts of money (i.e. enough to have a permanent paid workforce) relative to the value it provides (especially compa
379.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Yeah certainly, changing the terms retroactively was just something else. However I still think that the $0.20 headlines did a lot of reputational damage (even if most medium-major customers did the math) and that could easily have been avo
380.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> lived "20 cents per install" policy Funnily enough nobody who paid attention was going to pay the $0.2 since it was only there to funnel developers to the pro tier which would have given them a significant discount on the per
381.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
And how would that work accounting wise? Would they just claim that a bunch of PCs "fall off" a truck? I'm not sure subjecting everyone to poorly regulated (even in the EU it's fair from ideal) monopolies/oligopolie
382.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Are that many chips actually affected (AFAIK it's only consumer desktop CPUs which is a niche market)? They also seemingly changed their warranty policy, so unless the melting CPU caused additional damage what would they be sued over?
383.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> if Capitalism gets us Epstein What does it have to do with capitalism? People like that or much worse thrive in non democratic states with no rule of law and absolutely no public transparency (e.g. Beria). It's just we don't
384.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
It's funny, though they are literally pure coloured sugar yet are also somehow magically calory free
385.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> maybe they can't because AMD doesn't have the capacity to make them. Or Intel just cut prices on their server CPU so that they are sort of competitive despite much higher power usage to core ratio?
386.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> An M3 Max will often match a 14900KS in performance using 5-10% of the power. On Cinebench and Passmark CPU the 14900K is 50-60% faster so I'm not sure that's true.
387.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> If you can actually prove this you can prosecute them for it. How exactly do you think this would work? > This is explicitly illegal. Only if the congress agrees. For that you need the house and two-thirds of a senate so it's p
388.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
> They should take a page out of AMD's book and spin off fab. It's way too late for that now. But even with the benefit of hindsight if we go back by a few years abandoning their main potential advantage just to compete for lim
389.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Is that true? At least for consumer desktop CPUs AMD is significantly ahead for gaming (with X3D) while for MT/productivity workloads Intel and AMD seem to be pretty even (if we ignore power usage and the whole melting CPU thing..). Wh
390.
by Wytwwww 2y ago
Nvidia is charging what they are entirely because there is no or very little competition. There isn't much else to it, if AMD/Intel caught up Nvidia would suddenly start selling their GPUs for way less...

More ›