Wyoming23

14 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by Wyoming23 5y ago

   Because they're wildly different things. An author deciding to not print more copies of their old book is a different thing than a library or bookstore banning it.
2. 62.▲
   by Wyoming23 5y ago

   So your desired message was a double hypothetical straw man attack? You're suggesting that hypothetically if these technologies were viable, then hypothetically people would still oppose them, because you want to suggest they're a
3. 63.▲
   by Wyoming23 5y ago

   Genuine question- my understanding is an NFT has no legal rights and no legal connection to whatever real thing it's a token "of". Therefore, does existing copyright even consider an NFT as any sort of derivative work? It see
4. 64.▲
   by Wyoming23 5y ago

   True, the current cruelty of making all living things on earth suffer so that overweight Americans can continue cheaply eating meat 3 times a day is a pretty crushing tyranny. Or were you going the other way, and absurdly suggesting that no