WilcoKruijer

7 ms·

61.
by WilcoKruijer 1y ago
This exploit has its origin in the Quake engine. I remember exploiting the same thing in CoD4 (2007) and I believe even the release version of Black Ops I was vulnerable. It was known as the ‘q3dirtrav’ vulnerability.
62.
by WilcoKruijer 1y ago
You're right. Since we don't want to put too much pressure on the source database, we do save the (transformed) WAL items in an intermediary database (we call this the event store), so the source can clear its WAL. This does mean
63.
by WilcoKruijer 1y ago
I'm not too familiar with how people store the state of AI agents, but I do think there's some opportunity to use ReJot for this use case. Hooking up an agent to ReJot and giving them access to all available Public Schemas could b
64.
Show HN: ReJot – Database replication framework aimed at developers(github.com)
9 points by WilcoKruijer 1y ago|4 comments
65.
by WilcoKruijer 1y ago
Very cool! Are you manually porting all components or are you using some sort of automated process?
66.
by WilcoKruijer 1y ago
I’d like to see a true monotonic counter in Postgres. Serials can increment out of order when multiple transactions are active. We can obtain the WAL LSN, but it’s not related to the currently active transaction. I really like FoundationDB’
67.
by WilcoKruijer 2y ago
Define an interface, mock the implementation. How people outside of JS/TS have been doing it for years.
68.
When Kafka is not the right Move(rejot.dev)
11 points by WilcoKruijer 2y ago|0 comments
69.
by WilcoKruijer 2y ago
Interesting use case, I've also thought about this in the past. I wonder why you want to designate the local device as "owner". The devices could simply keep the (closed) payments in a local outbox, and send them to the serve